Could the Pope technically do away with OF right now?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thunderballs75
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

thunderballs75

Guest
Like, if he was just in a bad mood today, could he do away with it for eternity? This is a question not a statement.
 
What if he was in a bad mood, and did away with the EF for all eternity?

He can do one as easily as the other, right? Or have you thought about that?

Seriously, I think His Holiness is moving very carefully and pastorally in such a way as to not spook the herd.
 
[SIGN]oyyyyyy what a tease. [/SIGN] but to answer your question, technically Paul VI effectively “did away” with the Mass of the Ages, so yes, the Pope has the lawful authority to do so.
 
Ordinary form, the novus ono. The most common liturgy used in the Mass today.
 
The Pope can do away with or bring back any form of the Mass: Ordinary or Extraordinary, High or Low, etc. He has absolute power. But thankfully absolute power dose not corrupt absolutely; he is guided by God the Holy Spirit!
 
Ordinary form, the novus ono. The most common liturgy used in the Mass today.
👍

I miss the novus tridentine in greek and latin. We had a bass player who would absolutely shred the Dies Irae. It rocked.
 
It would be a disaster if the Pope did an immediate elimination of the NO Mass. After all, how many Priests would be able to say the TLM? I remember asking the Parochial Vicar at the parish I attend if we could ever do a TLM and I think his response is that we would first have to find someone who can properly do it.

Remember that I believe most Seminaries teach the NO Mass, so there would be many Priests who would be unfamiliar with how to properly do the TLM (by properly I mean would fully understand the Latin they were saying and understand the symbolism and meaning that is different in the TLM than the NO Mass).
 
What if he was in a bad mood, and did away with the EF for all eternity?

He can do one as easily as the other, right? Or have you thought about that?
What if he banished both, and made the Mozarabic Form the standard form! :rolleyes::eek:
 
excuse me for a quick question…

EF = Novus Ono = NO right? What does EF stand for?
 
EF = Extraordinary Form (1962 Missal)
OF = Ordinary Form (New Order of Mass - Novus Ordo Missae)
 
Actually, the Mozarabic has more Greek, even scattered through the Creed and other places.
 
I thought priests learned Latin in seminary anyway?
It is offered as an elective. one may choose to study Greek. In the states, everyone must pass a Spanish basic proficiency test. As of 6 years ago when I was studying first at one Seminary for philosophy, then another in a different part of the country for the Theologate, it was not a requirement.
 
I believe the Pope could do away with OF, but I think a gradual phasing out would be a better strategy.
 
=thunderballs75;5357892]Like, if he was just in a bad mood today, could he do away with it for eternity? This is a question not a statement.
Not as stated.

However the Supreme Pontiff has the right and moral obligation to insure that the Sacred Tradition of the Holy Mass is prayed in a manner that it is as Christ intended filled with saving Graces and actually leads us towards savation.

Can he make changes, certainly.
 
excuse me for a quick question…

EF = Novus Ono = NO right? What does EF stand for?
This may very well be answered in a later post but I needed to correct this.

EF = extraordinary Form = the pre-Vat 2 Mass or what many call the Tridentine

OF = ordinary Form = Novus Ordo = new order or (now I am not sure if this is right) The Pauline Form (meaning the name of the Pope who promulgated this Mass)

Brenda V.
 
Actually, the Mozarabic has more Greek, even scattered through the Creed and other places.
It may have more Greek than Latin, but it has more Latin than the OF does. I’ve watched quite a few Mozarabic liturgies on youtube, and they always chant the Sanctus in Latin. That right there is more than most OF Masses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top