Could there be additional persons in the 'Trinity'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hokomai
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

Hokomai

Guest
In Catholic teaching is there anything to preclude the idea that there could be unknown (to us) additional persons in the ‘Trinity’ (leaving aside the need to rename as the “Quarternity” etc. I understand that it is Catholic teaching that there are three persons, but is it definitive that there are only three?
 
While reading through the bible, there is no reference to a 4th, 5th, or even 6th person of the Trinity. >> So according to all the evidence given to us, by God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, there are only three. >> If there are more, they may be revealed at a later time, or maybe when we pass from this life to the next.

I really don’t think there are more then three persons of the Trinity. Only God knows.
 
In Catholic teaching is there anything to preclude the idea that there could be unknown (to us) additional persons in the ‘Trinity’ (leaving aside the need to rename as the “Quarternity” etc. I understand that it is Catholic teaching that there are three persons, but is it definitive that there are only three?
God hasn’t revealed such a thing as an extra person(s) in the Blessed Trinity in the deposit of Faith(Scripture and Apostolic Tradition) and since Christ was the definative messenger(As the Word Himself) and He didn’t alude to such a possibility, and we do not have a mechanism to come to know such a thing even if it were the case(a situation which is unlikely to be true to say the least) then the Doctrine of the Trinity won’t be overturned in this world.

In addition to this (and more fundamentally I would say) The Church has defined(that is codified the pre-existent truth) that God is one in essence and three in persons. This would from a Catholic doctrinal completly rule out an extra person in the Blessed Trinity.
 
Thanks for the responses. But is it definitive Catholic teaching that there are three, or that there are only three?
 
OK, in a bid to get some Catholic answers on Catholic Answers, let me suggest this:

Catholic teaching that there are three persons in the Godhead, known therefore as the Trinity, is based entirely on the fact that we have had contact with each of the three - God the Father directly to Moses and others, God the Son thorough the incarnation and the Holy Spirit through Pentecost and afterwards. This in no way precludes the possibility of other persons in the Godhead and, given the infinity of God’s existence, it is placing a false restriction on the power of God to suggest there is a limit to the number of persons based only on our experience. Further, nothing in Catholic teaching or tradition addresses this possibility. Catholics on the basis of reasoning or personal revelation, would therefore be free to believe in any number of persons.
 
What in these creeds precludes the possibility of there being others?
Simple logic. Trinity is dogma, not Trinity + unknown (which is a contradiction.) If there is more than three, then God is not Triune; though this is untenable since revealed theology does not say this but states three Persons. By the very fact it is dogma that He is Triune, we are bound by necessity to refuse innovation of other Persons, least we depart from the Christian faith.
 
Simple logic. Trinity is dogma, not Trinity + unknown (which is a contradiction.) If there is more than three, then God is not Triune; though this is untenable since revealed theology does not say this but states three Persons. By the very fact it is dogma that He is Triune, we are bound by necessity to refuse innovation of other Persons, least we depart from the Christian faith.
Thanks TS. If I say: “I have three oranges in my bag”, and even give them a name “the three”, it cannot be logically concluded that there are no other oranges in my bag, or anywhere else for that matter. If there is a specific Church teaching that they are three, and only three, where is it?
 
Thanks TS. If I say: “I have three oranges in my bag”, and even give them a name “the three”, it cannot be logically concluded that there are no other oranges in my bag, or anywhere else for that matter. If there is a specific Church teaching that they are three, and only three, where is it?
If you insist.

There is only one Son,

[BIBLEDRB]John 3:16[/BIBLEDRB]

From this relation there is only one procession (the Holy Ghost) between the two, not many but one response, which is goodness or love. To advocate a mutiple of Holy Ghosts is a misunderstanding of the Trinity. Might want to study Question 30 of the Summa, Prima Pars, to better understand the dogma.
 
Jesus taught us about the nature of the Trinity in the Gospels. His Baptism
Is an instance of self-revelation of the Trinity in its fullness. Jesus the Son is blessed upon the commencement of His ministry by God the Spirit, who descends upon Him as a dove, and the Father, who announces to all the Sonship of Jesus. On such an occasion a hypothetical Fourth Person would also of necessity made his (her?) presence plain in the same manner as Father and Spirit did. It would have been necessary, in order that Jesus’ ministry commence in a proper and rightly ordered fashion.

Then again, Jesus reveals the Trinity when He commands His Apostles to baptize in the name of Father, Son and Spirit. The purpose of baptism is to claim us as adopted children of the Godhead. Such a baptism/adoption would be gravely deficient and incomplete, not to mention improper, were it to exclude any Divine person from being claimed as parent.
 
Thanks TS. If I say: “I have three oranges in my bag”, and even give them a name “the three”, it cannot be logically concluded that there are no other oranges in my bag, or anywhere else for that matter. If there is a specific Church teaching that they are three, and only three, where is it?
But we don’t “name” them three, as if giving vaule by the name we give them in some sort of nominalistic fashion, rather we recognise the reality of God being three persons in one substance and one substance in three persons. To say that God is three persons is to exclude the possibility of God being 2,4,5,6,7 etc. persons. To say God is three persons is to make a definative statment about reality.

"The Trinity is One. We do not confess three Gods, but one God in three persons, the ‘consubstantial Trinity’. [Council of Constantinople II (A.D 553)]

Note this is not at least three persons, but three persons; the Trinity. Again to name something definitively as Trinity is to exclude the possibility of it being a quaternity or anything else.
 
The Virgin Mother Mary is the Spouse of the Holy Spirit. I see her as potentially becoming a part of the Trinity, making the Trinity into a Quad. .
 
But we don’t “name” them three, as if giving vaule by the name we give them in some sort of nominalistic fashion, rather we recognise the reality of God being three persons in one substance and one substance in three persons. To say that God is three persons is to exclude the possibility of God being 2,4,5,6,7 etc. persons. To say God is three persons is to make a definative statment about reality.

"The Trinity is One. We do not confess three Gods, but one God in three persons, the ‘consubstantial Trinity’. [Council of Constantinople II (A.D 553)]

Note this is not at least three persons, but three persons; the Trinity. Again to name something definitively as Trinity is to exclude the possibility of it being a quaternity or anything else.
But as we do not know the fullness of God, and cannot, surely it is possibly if it is not definitively excluded? And calling the Godhead 'the Trinity" could mean “the persons and unity of God we can discern”.

I am not convinced that there is clear Catholic teaching excluding the possibility of more persons.
 
The Virgin Mother Mary is the Spouse of the Holy Spirit. I see her as potentially becoming a part of the Trinity, making the Trinity into a Quad. .
No way. Mary is a human being, created like all of us. Human beings do not become members of the Godhead alongside the Trinity. The essence of God is uncreated, and so a creature cannot become God.
 
But as we do not know the fullness of God, and cannot, surely it is possibly if it is not definitively excluded? And calling the Godhead 'the Trinity" could mean “the persons and unity of God we can discern”.

I am not convinced that there is clear Catholic teaching excluding the possibility of more persons.
We don’t know everything that there is to know. However we DO know certain things. Things that are revealed by God. We do know per Moses that there is only one God, for example, not dozens as the Greeks had nor hundreds as the Hindus have.

We know per Jesus that God has begotten a Son. Who became man in the person of that same Jesus.

And we know, per the guidance of the Holy Spirit, that there are three, not two or four, persons in the Godhead. And that there never have nor ever will be two or four or other than three persons.
 
And we know, per the guidance of the Holy Spirit, that there are three, not two or four, persons in the Godhead. And that there never have nor ever will be two or four or other than three persons.
But where does it say: three, not four?
 
But where does it say: three, not four?
It says in the magisterial and infallible teaching of the church council of Constantinople as quoted above.

Which says one God. Not two Gods or eight Gods or 24.

And it says with exactly the same certitude that that one God isin three persons. Not one God who may possibly be in three persons, but may also possibly be in 4, or 287, or half a person. Or in anything other than three persons.

Like when your science book says water comes in three forms - solid, liquid, and gas - it means three. It doesn’t mean that water ever has or ever will come in anything less than or more than three forms.
 
It says in the magisterial and infallible teaching of the church council of Constantinople as quoted above.

Which says one God. Not two Gods or eight Gods or 24.

And it says with exactly the same certitude that that one God isin three persons. Not one God who may possibly be in three persons, but may also possibly be in 4, or 287, or half a person. Or in anything other than three persons.

Like when your science book says water comes in three forms - solid, liquid, and gas - it means three. It doesn’t mean that water ever has or ever will come in anything less than or more than three forms.
Exactly my point. We now know it comes in plasma as well. We knew of three, now we know of more. It was never exclusive. There may yet be other forms of matter.

windows2universe.org/sun/Solar_interior/Sun_layers/Core/four_states.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top