Could've Mary said no?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dancelittleewok
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Dancelittleewok

Guest
Did Mary have the free will to say no to bear Our Savior as the angel commanded?
 
I’m sure she could have, but I doubt God would have chosen her if she were the sort to do so!!
😛
Thankfully she was around when she was needed!
😛 😛 😛
 
Did Mary have the free will to say no to bear Our Savior as the angel commanded?
If a devilworshipper entered your home and demanded that you plunge a butcher knife into the heart of your lover, you are free to say yes… but would you? Most likely not. Your love for your partner and your abhorrance of evil would prevent you.

Mary could have said No… but her love for God, manifest in obedience, and her enmity towards displeasing God prevented her.

Thal59
 
Did Mary have the free will to say no to bear Our Savior as the angel commanded?
I agree with the previous posts. However, just wanted to point out that I don’t think the angel Gabriel “commanded” Mary but merely announced that she would give birth to the saviour.
 
This is one more thing makes Mary so special. You bet she could have said no. She had free will just like we all do. However, her yes was an obedient yes. Her obedience brought the Savior to the world. Some people believe that Mary was just an “incubator” for Our Lord and that, had she said no, God would have just found someone else to do the job. But I do not think so. The whole reason we needed a Savior was because of the disobedience of mankind, starting with Adam and Eve. It does not sound reasonable to me that if Mary had said “no” God would have said “Oh, OK, sorry to have bothered you…” and gone on to the next virgin.

Did God know she would say yes? Well, of course, He knows everything. But His knowledge of that act of obedience ahead of time doesn’t minimize the importance of her obedience.

That’s my :twocents: anyway!
 
I agree with the previous posts. However, just wanted to point out that I don’t think the angel Gabriel “commanded” Mary but merely announced that she would give birth to the saviour.
One has posted in another forum:
That doesn’t negate the fact that Mary was never asked for permission, she was TOLD what was to happen.
Can you address this FACT or not?
And behold, you WILL conceive in your womb and bring forth a Son, and shall call His name JESUS. 32 He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Highest; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David. 33 And He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of His kingdom there will be no end.”
Notice what it says…it says you WILL, not “will you” give birth…
 
Did Mary have the free will to say no to bear Our Savior as the angel commanded?
Yes, she had the same free will as Eve did, when Eve said “Yes” to Satan.

According to some of the Early Fathers, her “Yes” to God “unknotted” Eve’s “Yes” to Satan, and just as Eve’s freely given “Yes” to Satan paved the way for Adam’s disobedience, so also Mary’s freely given “Yes” to God paved the way for Christ’s obedience on the Cross. They call her the “Second Eve” for this very reason.
 
That doesn’t negate the fact that Mary was never asked for permission, she was TOLD what was to happen.
Can you address this FACT or not?
And behold, you WILL conceive in your womb and bring forth a Son, and shall call His name JESUS. 32 He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Highest; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David. 33 And He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of His kingdom there will be no end.”
Notice what it says…it says you WILL, not “will you” give birth…
Sure, and if my boss comes to me and says, “Here I need you to type this up for me,” I still have the free will to tell him no even though he didn’t phrase it in a question. Not that I’d actually* do that*, but for argument’s sake…😉
 
God didn’t “ask” per se, that is why it is called the “annunciation”. However, after the angel answered her question “How can this be…” Mary said “Let it be done to me according to your word”. She could have said “no way Jose, that would put a crimp in my plans”. So, though it was an announcement, Mary still had a response to give. It could have been a negative one which would have been disobedient. (Notice how the angel does not depart from her until she says “Let it be done to me…”)

God didn’t ask Adam and Eve not to eat the fruit. He commanded, “You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’” But they disobeyed Him anyway.
 
IMHO - Mary could have said no. She had free will, just like any of the rest of us.

Some saint whose name escapes me at the moment made the comment that the angels waited with baited breath for Mary’s response to Gabriel.

The fact that God knew she was going to say yes is no different than God knowing what any of us will do - since God is outside of time, he can see the future. But the fact that God sees what we will do does not negate our free will.
 
I don’t think she could have said “no”. Not because she was forced to say “yes”, but because one completely untouched by sin would have no other desire than to serve God fully. How could someone “full of grace” refuse the Lord? Preposterous!
 
IMHO - Mary could have said no. She had free will, just like any of the rest of us.

Some saint whose name escapes me at the moment made the comment that the angels waited with baited breath for Mary’s response to Gabriel.
“bated” (held) - not “baited.” 😉

But, yes, the angels held their breath until Mary said, “Fiat” - be it done unto me as thou hast said. 🙂 :yup:
 
“bated” (held) - not “baited.” 😉

But, yes, the angels held their breath until Mary said, “Fiat” - be it done unto me as thou hast said. 🙂 :yup:
Thanks for the correction. Any idea who or where that originated with?
 
I don’t think she could have said “no”. Not because she was forced to say “yes”, but because one completely untouched by sin would have no other desire than to serve God fully. How could someone “full of grace” refuse the Lord? Preposterous!
Wow! I like that very much. That was a very good answer, Trelow. In fact, that was a magnificiently good answer. I am glad I read it! 🙂

Peace and blessings to you.
 
That doesn’t negate the fact that Mary was never asked for permission, she was TOLD what was to happen.
Can you address this FACT or not?
And behold, you WILL conceive in your womb and bring forth a Son, and shall call His name JESUS. 32 He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Highest; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David. 33 And He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of His kingdom there will be no end.”
Notice what it says…it says you WILL, not “will you” give birth…
This sounds like prophesy. Prophesy doesn’t sound ambivialant (even when it ends up being wrong.)
 
That doesn’t negate the fact that Mary was never asked for permission, she was TOLD what was to happen.

This sounds like prophesy. Prophesy doesn’t sound ambivialant (even when it ends up being wrong.)
So she was told was to happen, does that mean that she didn’t have a choice?
 
First my apologies…I edited my post above (didn’t do the quote right).
This part is my thought:
This sounds like prophesy. Prophesy doesn’t sound ambivialant (even when it ends up being wrong.)
Gabriel wasn’t ordering Mary to do something, he was prophesying that something would happen.
 
I don’t think she could have said “no”. Not because she was forced to say “yes”, but because one completely untouched by sin would have no other desire than to serve God fully. How could someone “full of grace” refuse the Lord? Preposterous!
mmm…I’m not sure I could agree fully. The choice was still there as all humans have free will. Therefore, she could have said no (could being the operative word for me). However, I fully agree with you that because of her full state of grace she would never say no. As you rightly point out, it is preposterous to think a person full of grace would refuse the Lord anything. Perhaps I am splitting hairs here, and I don’t mean to, but I am a strong believer in the concept of “free will for all”. If we start saying she couldn’t have been disobedient it seems as if God was disallowing her free will. Even Jesus had free will, which is why He was able to be “tempted”, however because of His perfect state of grace He also would never be disobedient.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top