Cover story of US News & World Report magazine: A Return to Tradition

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lepanto
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Daniel Wallace, a professor of New Testament studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, which trains pastors for interdenominational or nondenominational churches, says there is a growing appetite for something more than “worship that is a glorified Bible class in some ways.”

LOL, how can you train PASTORS for positions in which different doctrines are being taught or ones where there is no official doctrines to follow? :eek:
Put simply, the development is a return to tradition and orthodoxy, to past practices, observances, and customary ways of worshiping. But it is not simply a return to the past—at least not in all cases. Even while drawing on deep traditional resources, many participants are creating something new within the old forms. They are engaging in what Penn State sociologist of religion Roger Finke calls “innovative returns to tradition.”
You see this at work quite clearly in the so-called emergent communities, new, largely self-organizing groups of young Christian adults who meet in private homes, church basements, or coffeehouses around the country. So free-form that many don’t even have pastors,** these groups nevertheless engage in some ancient liturgical practices**, including creedal declarations, public confession, and Communion. They may use a piece of a bagel as the body of Christ,** but the liturgy is a traditional anchor in services that may include films, skits, or group discussions** of a biblical topic.
Is this JOURNALISM? “INNOVATIVE returns to tradition” meaning NO pastors, church basements, coffeehouses, films, etc? That is pure insanity and contradiction.
I can understand updating certain things within certain parameters, but what was describe above is the blind leading the blind and insanity.
Some liberal Catholic clergy are completely skeptical about the scope and meaning of the traditionalist turn. “It’s more hype than reality,” says the Rev. Thomas Reese, a Jesuit priest and political scientist at Georgetown’s Woodstock Theological Center. Reese thinks the church should focus less on the Latin mass than on the three things that draw most churchgoers: "good preaching, good music, and a welcoming community."They still havnt gotten off the dope yet, he just described a protestant church service. 🙂
Perhaps this priest could explain why B16 is being stonewalled at every turn when trying to implement his Motu Proprio. 😉

That was a lousy article and didnt really even talk about traditional Catholicism. After reading that I could never subscribe to that magazine.
 
From the article:
"Some liberal Catholic clergy are completely skeptical about the scope and meaning of the traditionalist turn. “It’s more hype than reality,” says the Rev. Thomas Reese, a Jesuit priest and political scientist at Georgetown’s Woodstock Theological Center. Reese thinks the church should focus less on the Latin mass than on the three things that draw most churchgoers: “good preaching, good music, and a welcoming community.” He is equally dubious about all the attention being devoted to the habit-wearing Dominican Sisters of St. Cecilia and a few other traditional religious orders that have enjoyed an uptick in younger members. “I have no problem with their habits,” says Reese. "On the other hand, if the church ordained women, we’d have thousands more women coming forward."

First of all this priest is a Jesuit and therfore a member of the most liberal priestly society in the Church. Clearly he is for the ordination of women which has no basis in Tradition.
The idea that Protestants want to go back to traditional worship is odd since protestants have very little tradition. If they really want traditional worship then they need to become Catholic.
Their idea of using bagels for the Eucharist shows just how confused they are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top