COVID-19 ‘warp speed’ vaccines likely not safe and not needed, medical expert says

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Cathoholic

Guest

COVID-19 ‘warp speed’ vaccines likely not safe and not needed, medical expert says​

‘We’re making a vaccine at warp speed for a virus that doesn’t look like it’s going to need a vaccine…I don’t believe it is desirable, nor do I believe that it’s safe’

Fri Dec 11, 2020

In an interview published on YouTube on Tuesday, Patrick Coffin, Catholic commentator and podcaster, spoke to Dr. Theresa Deisher about “the coming COVID-19 vaccine,” where she explained that “[t]his virus today has less than a 0.03% fatality rate and most of those people, I believe 92% or above, have other health problems.”

Dr. Theresa Deisher, who made the comments, is the founder and chief scientist of the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, a non-profit dedicated to “end human trafficking and exploitation for the purposes of biomedical research and commercial products.” Deisher herself has a Ph.D. in Molecular and Cellular Physiology from Stamford University. . . .

. . . Commenting on the need for a vaccine, Deisher laid out that “this virus to date has less than a 0.03% fatality rate and most of those people, I believe it’s 92% or above, have other health problems; we’re making a vaccine at warp speed for a virus that doesn’t look like it’s going to need a vaccine.” She added that “t is possible, but I don’t believe it is desirable, nor do I believe that it’s safe,” with as much as “15% of the very healthy young volunteers [experiencing] significant side effects.”

The plight of the vaccine-injured​

Deisher and Coffin went on to discuss the 1986 Child Injury Act, a little-known law which prevents the vaccine-injured or their relatives from suing vaccine companies. . . .

. . . Instead a program for compensating victims of vaccine injury was created called The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP). According to Children’s Health Defense, the introduction of legal indemnity for vaccine manufacturers, and the subsequent compensation initiative, “failed miserably as a litigious, broken system where the injured are up against a government vaccine program, government owned vaccine patents, government health officials who administer the program and government paid attorneys from the Department of Justice.” The odds are stacked against claimants, for whom there is “no judge, no jury of your peers, and no discovery.”

Deisher agrees, stating that “it was not obviously the right decision and families [with] children have been harmed, grievously harmed.” She added that there is no other situation in which healthy people are coerced “because of our education policies” to take something which can damage them and leave them with “no recourse […] it’s really an atrocity.” . . .

 
She appears to be an anti vaxer with an agenda. Ok. I see where she coming from. She’s entitled to her opinion.
 
She appears to be an anti vaxer with an agenda.
Why do you say that?

Did you even listen to the video (that the article alludes to) or read the article?

Why would she recommend corona vaccine for certain people in certain instances?

I think your argument lacks persuasiveness and goes immediately to name -calling (“anti vaxer with an agenda.”).
 
Last edited:
Did you even listen to the video (that the article alludes to) or read the article?
No, I can’t on my iPad…sorry. I’m going by what is posted. I saw the organization she’s attached to and the comments about the vaccine harm law and this comment… “end human trafficking and exploitation for the purposes of biomedical research and commercial products.”

You posted most of the article, didn’t you? If there’s more, sorry, I can’t open it. I recognize the jargon as being typical of antivaxxers, though.

What impressed you about the article? I rarely listen to one doctors opinion on anything medical…there’s all types of doctors out there! You can always find one to match ones agenda.
 
To the readers here. Notice the name calling
and nothing against what this woman has said.

Nothing.
 
It’s just the same parasitic troll that’s been plaguing CAF for months. Nothing new really.
 
I know…I was hoping that with us closing, he’d give up. Instead, I think he’s more motivated.

Just flag him as you see him! Please!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top