Q
QNDNNDQDCE
Guest
I see what you are saying. Ron Conte only said that sanctifying grace is not the Divine Nature. By this, it is clear to me that he meant to clarify that sanctifying grace is not literally the Divine Nature (as in essence) in the soul, which could cause confusion. God’s essence belongs to himself alone. This would be similar to your quote from the Catholic Encyclopedia.
“An exaggerated theory was taught by certain mystics and quietists, a theory not free from pantheiotic taint. In this view the soul is formally changed into God, an altogether untenable and impossible hypothesis, since concupiscence remains even after justification, and the presence of concupiscence is, of course, absolutely repugnant to the Divine nature.”
“An exaggerated theory was taught by certain mystics and quietists, a theory not free from pantheiotic taint. In this view the soul is formally changed into God, an altogether untenable and impossible hypothesis, since concupiscence remains even after justification, and the presence of concupiscence is, of course, absolutely repugnant to the Divine nature.”