Creation, light first, then sun?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vince2paul
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Some want Genesis to be totally symbolic, but it is not. If the first premise is that the Bible is not a scientific text then why bring it up at all? I’ll tell you why. God needs to be viewed as having supernatural abilities that can only make sense from a purely human perspective.

Take a god, any god, from any mythology and what makes him a god? He can do things human beings cannot do. The Christian God, however, must be rendered symbolic regarding His work.

Did Jesus raise the dead, give sight to the blind and cleanse the lepers without science and technology. Was He raised bodily from the dead or not?

That’s why God is God.

"The Topical Reading

"This leads us to the possiblity that Genesis 1 is to be given a non-chronological, topical reading. Advocates of this view point out that, in ancient literature, it was common to sequence historical material by topic, rather than in strict chronological order.

"The argument for a topical ordering notes that at the time the world was created, it had two problems—it was “formless and empty” (1:2). In the first three days of creation, God solves the formlessness problem by structuring different.aspects of the environment.

"On day one he separates day from night; on day two he separates the waters below (oceans) from the waters above (clouds), with the sky in between; and on day three he separates the waters below from each other, creating dry land. Thus the world has been given form.

"But it is still empty, so on the second three days God solves the world’s emptiness problem by giving occupants to each of the three realms he ordered on the previous three days. Thus, having solved the problems of formlessness and emptiness, the task he set for himself, God’s work is complete and he rests on the seventh day.

"Real History

"The argument is that all of this is real history, it is simply ordered topically rather than chronologically, and the ancient audience of Genesis, it is argued, would have understood it as such.

"Even if Genesis 1 records God’s work in a topical fashion, it still records God’s work—things God really did.

"The Catechism explains that “Scripture presents the work of the Creator symbolically as a succession of six days of divine ‘work,’ concluded by the ‘rest’ of the seventh day” (CCC 337), but “nothing exists that does not owe its existence to God the Creator. The world began when God’s word drew it out of nothingness; all existent beings, all of nature, and all human history is rooted in this primordial event, the very genesis by which the world was constituted and time begun” (CCC 338).

"It is impossible to dismiss the events of Genesis 1 as a mere legend. They are accounts of real history, even if they are told in a style of historical writing that Westerners do not typically use.

"Adam and Eve: Real People

"It is equally impermissible to dismiss the story of Adam and Eve and the fall (Gen. 2–3) as a fiction. A question often raised in this context is whether the human race descended from an original pair of two human beings (a teaching known as monogenism) or a pool of early human couples (a teaching known as polygenism).

"In this regard, Pope Pius XII stated: “When, however, there is question of another conjectural opinion, namely polygenism, the children of the Church by no means enjoy such liberty. For the faithful cannot embrace that opinion which maintains either that after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first parents of all, or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents. Now, it is in no way apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the teaching authority of the Church proposed with regard to original sin which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam in which through generation is passed onto all and is in everyone as his own” (Humani Generis 37).

“The story of the creation and fall of man is a true one, even if not written entirely according to modern literary techniques. The Catechism states, “The account of the fall in Genesis 3 uses figurative language, but affirms a primeval event, a deed that took place at the beginning of the history of man. Revelation gives us the certainty of faith that the whole of human history is marked by the original fault freely committed by our first parents” (CCC 390).”

Source: Catholic Answers tract

Peace,
Ed
 
Stop trying to blow my mind! 🙂
Sorry. But think about it though. We are creatures made of matter. God’s universe is so arranged that our physical components are matter, into which He has infused a soul and therefore personhood. Atoms are our building blocks.

Why couldn’t angels, as purely spiritual beings, be “composed” of ideas; of thoughts, calculations, principles, into which God has infused personhood? (In ways we could not possibly comprehend on this earth) Why could not those things be angels’ building blocks?

Angels’ intellects and wills, we are told, are a unity. What an angel thinks, he does, and his very nature determines his decisions and actions, without fail. Now, suppose angels were at a point given freedom to divorce their natures from their intellects; in effect, to be free of their God-given natures, so they could reject their very natures and be free-floating intellects. Being devoid of positive attributes, purposes, natures, they would have been total negations of any nature whatever, and therefore of anything “good”. Evil is the negation of good. And so might devils be free-floating intellects devoid of all good and therefore of any purpose other than to admire their own cleverness? Intellects turned in on themselves.

I know, I know. All a bunch of speculation. Someday we’ll know, though. 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top