P
phil19034
Guest
Yeah, he surely doesn’t refute atheism anywhere as much as he could have. He could have quoted Aquinas, like he does when he teaches an entire short lecture on refuting atheism at the New Saint Thomas Institute.phil19034:
Perhaps. I just remember coming away with the feeling that atheism was logical. After all if all he has to go on is personal experience then what’s the point?You are taking what he wrote out of context.
However, I think he simply knew his target audience. The people who read that book are most likely not leaving for atheism. So he just basically tosses atheism aside without giving an apologetic against it.
Last edited: