W
WoundedIcon
Guest
Hi guys, I was just wondering what you guys thought about these things, or whether you know of any papal statements (historical or modern) that would clarify some issues about Bible translations. I personally lean towards literal translation and a more traditional approach, but I don’t like how the RSV is from Protestant roots and is missing some readings that are Catholic distinctives (Septuagintal, “in the person of Christ”, “she shall crush”, etc.), and I am uncertain about methods of textual criticism, partly because I’ve seen the train wreck of an arguing mess some of those things can cause among Protestants. At the same time, if I want a modern Catholic-translated Bible from those texts I find that I have to go to the NJB or NAB. I’m weary of dynamic equivalence in the former (I like to really analyze passages 4-Sense style) and I just. can’t. trust. the NAB. Plus it reads like a scholar talking down to a pew-warmer.
You guys probably know more of the Vatican-related side of things though, so I figure I’d ask.
P.S. I was thinking of learning Koine Greek anyways, but since there are no courses nearby I’m afraid I may wind up with a faulty online/self-taught understanding of the language.
You guys probably know more of the Vatican-related side of things though, so I figure I’d ask.
P.S. I was thinking of learning Koine Greek anyways, but since there are no courses nearby I’m afraid I may wind up with a faulty online/self-taught understanding of the language.