I would also tell him that he has two choices: 1. Immediately stop cross dressing and immediately seek therapy from a good Catholic therapist. or 2. Face the end of your relationship with him.
This is not realistic. It isn’t a faith issue, it’s a psychological issue. He needs a proper diagnosis: is it fetishistic transvestism, or is he transgendered? If the latter, then I would agree she should have reservations about marrying him. If the former, it may be controllable to a certain extent, but it is not ever “curable”.
As others have said, if you marry him while he has this habit, you’re going to be in for a world of hurt.
Hurt is self-inflicted. Some women have no problems accepting it and working around the disorder, which BTW most psychologists consider relatively minor. Others take great offense. The ownership of how one feels about cross-dressing, for the offended, belongs to the offended and not the cross-dresser. The wife of the cross dresser also has her limitations and personality traits that are all her own. It really boils down to whether she is open-minded and can overcome her reticence, or due to her own limitations she cannot. If she can’t she’s better off not marrying him. If she can, then the relationship may be able to work. For those who manage to make it work, strict boundaries are usually required, and often the deal is that it is kept discreet and to himself, is done while alone, and most importantly that the children, if any, not be exposed to it.
Generally people with such disordered desires such as this also turn out to have a myriad of other mental health issues.
Not true. Gross over generalization. Most men with this fetish are highly intelligent and highly productive and functional members of society. Please don’t taint this discussion with your own prejudices.
That said, there is hope if he agrees to immediately stop the cross dressing and is willing to seek out therapy for this.
That would be an unrealistic expectation, although he may be able to keep a lid on it and go without for a very long time.
Very little is know about the etiology of cross-dressing, except that there is some evidence that
some cases were started by the child being dressed as a girl by a significant female relative. That is, in fact, a form of perversive sexual abuse. For men who have suffered that kind of abuse, compassion will go much farther than condemnation. It is
not a voluntary “sin”. It may be grave matter, and there may be full knowledge, but I can guarantee that there isn’t full consent. Most cross-dressers would probably, given the choice, wish to be anything but. Incidentally this has nothing to do with homosexuality.
If indeed her fiancé is a cross-dresser because of perversive sexual abuse by a significant female relative, he does need to confront that demon head-on, find a way to forgive from the heart, and obtain closure. Keeping a lid on that is most certainly more psychologically damaging than the cross-dressing itself.
Almost all of us bear the wounds of original sin. His cross-dressing is no better, nor any worse, than the sins we all bear. I have a friend who had an alcoholic father who beat his mother and whose mother showed him little or no affection. He has had marital difficulties over this as he comes across as very cold. My wife had a father who spent WWII in a Japanese prison camp and battled serious demons afterwards because of it. I was abused by my mother, and my father, who was my refuge and protector, died when I was 12. We all bear scars from unpleasant experiences. I suggest that if we turn away people with minor disorders based on their past, we would have few friends and no spouse.
Would it be better to marry a man who is upfront about his cross-dressing and understands his disorder, and is willing and able to deal with it within reasonable boundaries but is also a loving husband, father and provider, or would it be better to marry a man who later turns out to be a wife-beating alcoholic?
The one main thing that wives of cross-dressers bring up in their reaction to it, is the deception and lies that had been used to cover it up. Most say the cross-dressing they could live with, it’s the surprise of discovering it late in the marriage that is distressing due to the deception. At least her fiancé was up front about it. He took a
huge risk in telling her, that he would lose her.
It may be looked at as a chronic disorder that has periods of relapse and remission. Is that any different than discovering that say, your husband has Crohn’s disease that is also marked with periods of remission, and relapse (when he wouldn’t be able to be very productive)?
In any case she is assured of one thing if she marries him: she is marrying an honest man, not a deceptive one.