Crucifix

  • Thread starter Thread starter catholicdad01
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I may not be a genius, but I understand what this means

Deuteronomy 4:15 Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that the LORD spake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire:

Deuteronomy 4:16 Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female,
 
We in the Reformed Church see the Crucifix as idolatry, clear and simple…
Come on, that is a little weak. We may be Catholic but we’re smart enough to know that it is only a piece of wood or stone or whatever.

If you want to sling around idolatry charges you might make a better case about the Eucharist since we say that is the Body of Christ and not merely a representation of it. It would still be a weak case but you would make more people scratch their heads than the tired old Crucifix-is-a-graven-image chestnut.

Of course that does raise an interesting question of the position of the liturgical Protestant churches that have a communion service but treat it as a symbol rather than the Real Presence (just as Catholics regard statues). Are they engaging in idolatry? If not what is the difference?
 
Talk about weak? deflecting this issue by bringing up the Eucharist…lol

Anyways, Ive seen RCC members bow to the Crucifix as they enter Church…Ive seen the adoration the ‘faithful’ have when the Pope raises his twisted Crucifix. Its idolatry

Hey, what the story behind the twisted crucifix anyways?
 
I may not be a genius, but I understand what this means…
Deuteronomy 4:16 Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female,
Ah, cherry picking verses.

Are you saying that any likeness, male or female is therefore a graven image?
Like the Mona Lisa, or the Statue of liberty, your grandma’s picture on the mantle?

If not, why and what is the difference between those images and what we use?
 
Steve, it isnt probably for this thread…but I will take this opportunity(since you asked) to give our position on the Sacrament of the Lords Supper(from the Belgic Confession)

Article 35: Of the Holy Supper of our Lord Jesus Christ.
We believe and confess, that our Savior Jesus Christ did ordain and institute the sacrament of the holy supper, to nourish and support those whom he hath already regenerated, and incorporated into his family, which is his Church. Now those, who are regenerated, have in them a two-fold life, the one corporal and temporal, which they have from the first birth, and is common to all men: the other spiritual and heavenly, which is given them in their second birth, which is effected by the word of the gospel, in the communion of the body of Christ; and this life is not common, but is peculiar to God’s elect. In like manner God hath given us, for the support of the bodily and earthly life, earthly and common bread, which is subservient thereto, and is common to all men, even as life itself. But for the support of the spiritual and heavenly life, which believers have, he hath sent a living bread, which descended from heaven, namely, Jesus Christ, who nourishes and strengthens the spiritual life of believers, when they eat him, that is to say, when they apply and receive him by faith in the spirit. Christ, that he might represent unto us this spiritual and heavenly bread, hath instituted an earthly and visible bread, as a sacrament of his body, and wine as a sacrament of his blood, to testify by them unto us, that, as certainly as we receive and hold this sacrament in our hands, and eat and drink the same with our mouths, by which our life is afterwards nourished, we also do as certainly receive by faith (which is the hand and mouth of our soul) the true body and blood of Christ our only Savior in our souls, for the support of our spiritual life. Now, as it is certain and beyond all doubt, that Jesus Christ hath not enjoined to us the use of his sacraments in vain, so he works in us all that he represents to us by these holy signs, though the manner surpasses our understanding, and cannot be comprehended by us, as the operations of the Holy Ghost are hidden and incomprehensible. In the meantime we err not, when we say, that what is eaten and drunk by us is the proper and natural body, and the proper blood of Christ. But the manner of our partaking of the same, is not by the mouth, but by the spirit through faith. Thus then, though Christ always sits at the right hand of his Father in the heavens, yet doth he not therefore cease to make us partakers of himself by faith. This feast is a spiritual table, at which Christ communicates himself with all his benefits to us, and gives us there to enjoy both himself, and the merits of his suffering and death, nourishing, strengthening and comforting our poor comfortless souls by the eating of his flesh, quickening and refreshing them by the drinking of his blood. Further, though the sacraments are connected with the thing signified, nevertheless both are not received by all men: the ungodly indeed receives the sacrament to his condemnation, but he doth not receive the truth of the sacrament. As Judas, and Simon the sorcerer, both indeed received the sacrament, but not Christ, who was signified by it, of whom believers only are made partakers. Lastly, we receive this holy sacrament in the assembly of the people of God, with humility and reverence, keeping up amongst us a holy remembrance of the death of Christ our Savior, with thanksgiving: making there confession of our faith, and of the Christian religion. Therefore no one ought to come to this table without having previously rightly examined himself; lest by eating of this bread and drinking of this cup, he eat and drink judgment to himself. In a word, we are excited by the use of this holy sacrament, to a fervent love towards God and our neighbor. Therefore we reject all mixtures and damnable inventions, which men have added unto, and blended with the sacraments, as profanations of them: and affirm that we ought to rest satisfied with the ordinance which Christ and his apostles have taught us, and that we must speak of them in the same manner as they have spoken.
 
Yea, Im a cherry picker of verses, I only cut n paste what is important to me…why should you take heed from verses like these?

Exodus 20:4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:

Exodus 20:5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
 
Talk about weak? deflecting this issue by bringing up the Eucharist…lol

Anyways, Ive seen RCC members bow to the Crucifix as they enter Church…Ive seen the adoration the ‘faithful’ have when the Pope raises his twisted Crucifix. Its idolatry

Hey, what the story behind the twisted crucifix anyways?
I’ve never seen anyone bow to the crucifix… I"ve seen them genuflect towards Christ in the tabernacle.
 
Baraq,

Moses made a bronze serpent.

Who ordered it be made?

:ehh:
 
Baraq,

Can you at least agree with us that God never contradicts Himself? No, of course He doesn’t. So, if just the making of graven images is forbidden, why is it that God expressly commanded that the Ark of the Covenent be made with graven images of beings in heaven?? :hmmm: Seems to me if simply making a graven image was forbidden, He wouldn’t be asking the Israelites to make a graven image on the holy vessel that held God’s own written Word. Not to mention the Holy of Holies and the bronze serpent. So, lets reason here. Perhaps you are wrong. Perhaps you and your entire congregation have interpreted the meaning of the scripture incorrectly. Every verse you cited has to do with making graven images and worshipping them. I assure you Catholics do not worship the Crucifix nor any statue. We are reverent about the people represented therein. If I see a crucifix, I think of Jesus Christ who was obedient to the death for my sake. If I see a statue of Mary, I think of a humble maiden who was also completely obedient to God. I do not think to myself “All hail, the wood and plaster before me is a mighty god”. What a preposterous notion.:whacky:

Do you honestly believe that bowing is worship??? Surely not!
 
I was wondering if there is anyone here who has problem with wearing the Crucifix but hanging pictures of their loved ones on the wall at home?
 
I may not be a genius, but I understand what this means

Deuteronomy 4:15 Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that the LORD spake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire:

Deuteronomy 4:16 Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female,
Yeah it’s cherry picking…look at the context that you conveniently failed to cite because it would invalidate your premise.
15 Keep therefore your souls carefully. You saw not any similitude in the day that the Lord God spoke to you in Horeb from the midst of the fire:

16 Lest perhaps being deceived you might make you a graven similitude, or image of male or female, 17 The similitude of any beasts, that are upon the earth, or of birds, that fly under heaven, 18 Or of creeping things, that move on the earth, or of fishes, that abide in the waters under the earth: 19 Lest perhaps lifting up thy eyes to heaven, thou see the sun and the moon, and all the stars of heaven, and being deceived by error thou adore and serve them, which the Lord thy God created for the service of all the nations, that are under heaven.

You may not be a genius but you know what that means. It means that since no Catholic worships the crucifix or any other image that your allegation falls apart in the face of truth.
Anyways, Ive seen RCC members bow to the Crucifix as they enter Church…Ive seen the adoration the ‘faithful’ have when the Pope raises his twisted Crucifix. Its idolatry
That is bunk! I don’t guess it occurred to you that we might bow our head in acknowledgment of sin and praise and worship of the holy Lord Jesus Christ who ransomed us from that terrible fate.
Hey, what the story behind the twisted crucifix anyways?
It’s not “twisted” Baraq, it’s art. It is meant to convey the weight of our sins that Our Lord bore on the cross and the terrible price that He paid for us.

Paul said he knew nothing but Christ and Him crucified…why then do you berate us for that same thing?
Yea, Im a cherry picker of verses, I only cut n paste what is important to me…why should you take heed from verses like these?

Exodus 20:4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:

Exodus 20:5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them:
for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;Again… no one in the Catholic Church “serves” (worships as God) the images that we use, so again, your premise fails because you attempt to twist the meaning of the Word of God and our own beliefs and practices into something that they are not.
Pax Domini sit semper vobiscum.
 
Leatherman, Yes the Lord ordered the making of the Bronze Serpent, and that item was the means used to save those in the wilderness. Today we are ordered to preach the Gospel as the means to bring faith to the elect. The Gospel is the means that God has chosen to bring salvation to his people.(Faith comes by hearing)

Prayer Warrior,
You want to use the Ark to justify your own idolatry?
Was God contradicting the law that Noah(Gen 9:6) gave when he asked Abraham to sacrifice Isaac?(who knows, maybe israelites used that as justification to pass their kids through the fire to Molech)
Does the Holy Ghost contradict himself when the Gospels dont exactly match up? Ever read the Gospels closely and compare the events?
 
Prayer Warrior,
You want to use the Ark to justify your own idolatry?
I am no longer part of the Catholic Church, but even I see plainly that there is no idolatry. It is simply a misunderstanding as to what the images mean, and as to a change in the law.

Just as dietary restrictions have been taken away with Christ’s death and resurrection (for now nothing is unclean to us, as the world has been cleansed by His sacrifice, as with Jew and Gentile), so because Christ became man to take his image and flesh as His Own, we can make images of Him, and of others in the sense that they are like Him.
 
Militant,

yea, I see people kissing blocks of wood and stone all the time…its completely normal, no worship or adoration there{rolling eyes}
 
Noma, Paul confirms this Law in Romans 1. As for dietery restrictions, God has clensed creatures(like us) not idols…nice try though
Romans 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
 
Prayer Warrior,
You want to use the Ark to justify your own idolatry?
It would be very wise to refrain from false accusations and insults, else your time here will be considerably shortened.

Just as words edify the ear, so also the image stimulates the eye. What the book is to the literate, the image is to the illiterate. Just as words speak to the ear, so the image speaks to the sight; it brings us understanding. For this reason God ordered the ark to be constructed of wood which would not decay, and to be gilded outside and in, and for the tablets to be placed inside, with Aaron’s staff and the golden urn containing the manna, in order to provide a remembrance of the past, and an image of the future.
Who can say that these were not images, heralds sounding from far off? …Obviously they were not adored for their own sake, but through them the people were led to remember the wonders of old and to worship God, the worker of wonders. They were images serving as memorials; they were not divine, but led to the remembrance of divine power.
St. John of Damascus: On the Holy Images
 
Noma, Paul confirms this Law in Romans 1. As for dietery restrictions, God has clensed creatures(like us) not idols…nice try though
Romans 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
Romans 1:23 was speaking of the past, when all images were idols.

Now there is an image of Christ. If all images now are idols, then the image Christ took when He came to the earth is also an idol, and so God is guilty of making an image of Himself “like to corruptible man”.
 
Why non-Catholics are judging the Catholics from the outside without knowing exactly what we are doing? :rolleyes: and when we told you guys what we do, you just don’t want to hear the truth.
 
Romans 1:23 was speaking of the past, when all images were idols.

Now there is an image of Christ. If all images now are idols, then the image Christ took when He came to the earth is also an idol, and so God is guilty of making an image of Himself “like to corruptible man”.
I agree with you, noma. I believe when Jesus warned about idolotary, He warned about those who worship false God. Those images were not of the true God.
 
Noma, I would suggest you should refrain from blasphemy when trying to win an argument
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top