K
Kaste
Guest
Some Orthodox point to St. Cyril of Alexandria to defend their concept that marriages can be disolved. A Bishop under the Patriarch of Constantinople quoted Cyril near the end to make his point:
“A question we can ask ourselves is whether Christ considered marriage as being indissoluble? We need to be very clear in this as when Christ teaches that marriage may not be dissolved that does not mean that He is stating that it cannot occur. The completeness of the marriage relationship can be tainted by erroneous behaviour. In other words, it is the offence that breaks the bond. The divorce is ultimately a result of this break. This is also the teaching of the Eastern Church fathers. A quotation from the testimony of Cyril of Alexandria will be sufficient to make our point here: **“It is not the letters of divorce that dissolve the marriage in relation God but the errant behaviour”.**21]”
orthodoxresearchinstitute.org/articles/liturgics/athenagoras_remarriage.htm
I have been unable to verify his footnote. Has anyone else come across this quote attributed to Cyril? Any comments on its veracity, context and source are appreciated.
Thank you,
K
“A question we can ask ourselves is whether Christ considered marriage as being indissoluble? We need to be very clear in this as when Christ teaches that marriage may not be dissolved that does not mean that He is stating that it cannot occur. The completeness of the marriage relationship can be tainted by erroneous behaviour. In other words, it is the offence that breaks the bond. The divorce is ultimately a result of this break. This is also the teaching of the Eastern Church fathers. A quotation from the testimony of Cyril of Alexandria will be sufficient to make our point here: **“It is not the letters of divorce that dissolve the marriage in relation God but the errant behaviour”.**21]”
orthodoxresearchinstitute.org/articles/liturgics/athenagoras_remarriage.htm
I have been unable to verify his footnote. Has anyone else come across this quote attributed to Cyril? Any comments on its veracity, context and source are appreciated.
Thank you,
K