B brb2 Guest Sep 23, 2009 #1 How do the Freemasons view his depiction of your secret Organization’s influence on USA government ?
D datingtrappists Guest Sep 23, 2009 #2 Dan Brown didn’t write a fair (or even a correct) view of Catholicism, so I doubt very much that he would write one for the Freemasons either.
Dan Brown didn’t write a fair (or even a correct) view of Catholicism, so I doubt very much that he would write one for the Freemasons either.
B brb2 Guest Sep 23, 2009 #3 datingtrappists said: Dan Brown didn’t write a fair (or even a correct) view of Catholicism, so I doubt very much that he would write one for the Freemasons either. Click to expand... It is an interesting read FM’s are real movers / shakers. Something like 14 past Presidents were FM’s. Washington, FDR, Truman, etc.
datingtrappists said: Dan Brown didn’t write a fair (or even a correct) view of Catholicism, so I doubt very much that he would write one for the Freemasons either. Click to expand... It is an interesting read FM’s are real movers / shakers. Something like 14 past Presidents were FM’s. Washington, FDR, Truman, etc.
C Cluny Guest Sep 23, 2009 #4 That means 30 of them were not. I’m sure Brown’s depiction of the Masons was every bit as accurate as his depictions of the Church in his first two novels.
That means 30 of them were not. I’m sure Brown’s depiction of the Masons was every bit as accurate as his depictions of the Church in his first two novels.