Dark Night of the Soul?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eli4n4
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
JR writes…Religious life is the most perfect form of life, but that does not mean that the individual religious is more perfect. He or she is still a sinner in need of conversion and redemption. The life that he or she has chosen is more perfect according to the Gospel, because it is the path that Mary chose as opposed to Martha’s or the path chosen by Paul and the other virgins of the early Church. It is also the path of life that Christ chose for himself. He chose to live a life completely dedicated to his Father, celibate, poor and obedient.
Hope this make sense.
Sorry, JR. But it is really now very clear to me, very, very clear that we are on totally different wavelengths altogether, altogether. I really don’t think it is much use me going on in this thread as it is unfolding. I think, think only, I can see where you are coming from, but I am unsure if you can see where I am coming from and I don’t think so…could be wrong.

*But I do thank you very much for sharing your concepts and understandings……….my warm regards…………Barb:) *

.
 
About knowledge from St. Faustina’s diary.
At that moment, I had a deeper knowledge of the Three Divine Persons, whom we shall contemplate for all eternity and, after millions of years, shall discover that we have just barely begun our contemplation. 1439
👍
 
Barb:
JR:
The position of the Church is that a person who responds to Chrit’s call to surrender everything for him, even the right to marriage, property, career, children, natural family, parents, friends, home, etc. has been called by Christ to a more intimate union with him than other Christians.
I cannot agree with this, again can you give reference details of where The Church says this. We are all called to Unity.
I couldn’t agree with you more, Barb. The other day, a friend and I were talking about marriage being a sacred vocation, and I commented on the beauty of St. Therese’s parents. Both had decided to consecrate themselves to a celibate lifestyle previously, but God made it clear to them that they were to marry. They raised a saint who became a Doctor of the Church, and three other children became nuns whom I would bet are also saints in heaven.

Some who did not know this will rejoice with all of us that these two married people are to be canonized in October. :angel1: ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=90533
It all depends on how God calls us and how faithful we are to living it.
 
TO JOYSONG and BarbaraTherese!

Have you noticed that you have completely hijacked this thread. The OP has probably given up and unsubscribed! Here you waffle all kinds of philosophical commdents to each other and forget totally that Jesus said that we should have faith “like little children”

How about that!
😛 😛
 
http://bestsmileys.com/sleeping/6.gif

There is a little red button to report the posts. Use it if you have a complaint. Not everyone will understand this thread, so if it’s over your head, why are you reading it? To complain and insult the participants?
Not at all. But don’t you think that you have completely taken over and totally ignored the OP? You might like to show off all your spirituality and knowledge but that doesn’t answer the OP’s question. I think the OP has probably given up on this thread. Are you saying I am insulting? Well, this is surprising.

😛
 
If you right click on the same line you see /file/edit/view/insert/format/ etc (IN WORD) you should have the rclick menu come up, is formating showing there and is it checked? Assuming you’re on XP or if it’s Vista I assume it would be the same though I can go to the screenshot site… Agreeing to attempting also ‘restore computer to earlier date’ but only as a last resort and not my first choice. So you actually mean the bar that says ‘styles and formating’ correct?

And back to dark night of the soul, whether or not that’s part of the past things as of late I don’t know but thankful God setting wheels in motion for me. Thankfully the state finally seems to know who I am and might actually get some help don’t know and very thankful for the prospect of a stable job in the horizon. I purposely avoided the other that used to lay off all the time and now I see they’re hiring part time/temp instead… honesty is the best policy, helps the people know what’s going on and not have to guess. Ok, so I no longer had what took almost 10 yrs to save up (was slow saving up in the beginning) but at least now might have my name corrected here finally and might finally be acknowledged as having a few things to deal with and might be able to have some help… playing the system, or trying to.

Thank God!

It’s Halleluja, not HalleluME!
AMEN!
 
Summa Theologica > Second Part of the Second Part > Question 182

Question 182. The active life in comparison with the contemplative life (My note: It is necessary to read the whole of Question 182 to grasp the overall meaning)


  1. *]Which of them is of greater import or excellence?
    *]Which of them has the greater merit?
    *]Is the contemplative life hindered by the active life?
    *]Their order

  1. The quotes and arguments that you supply by St. Thomas Aquinas seem to support what we have said about the contemplative life.

    There are other documents such as Perfectae Caritatis from Vatican II.

    "The sacred synod has already shown in the constitution on the Church that the pursuit of perfect charity through the evangelical counsels draws its origin from the doctrine and example of the Divine Master and reveals itself as a splendid sign of the heavenly kingdom."

    What is interesting here is the term “splendid sign of the heavenly kingdom”. The word sign is used in theology to mean proof.

    Therefore the consecrated life is the Church’s spendid proof of the Heavenly Kingdom. It is proof, because it is tangible.

    You asked about Francis in one of your posts. Pope Leo XIII wrote AUSPICATO CONCESSUM ENCYCLICAL OF POPE LEO XIII ON ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI about Francis and the Secular Franciscan Order. He speaks about many aspects of these topics. In speaking about Francis he says the following.

    ****“In this century appeared St. Francis. Yet with wondrous resolution and simplicity he undertook to place before the eyes of the aging world, in his words and deeds, the complete model of Christian perfection.”/**B]

    **“By his numerous virtues, then, and above all by his austerity of life, this irreproachable man **endeavoured to reproduce in himself the image of Christ Jesus. But the finger of Providence was again visible in granting to him a likeness to the Divine Redeemer, even in externals.”

    vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_17091882_auspicato-concessum_en.html

    Pope Piux XI wrote RITE EXPIATIS ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS XI ON ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI. He said the following.

    "Franciscan brotherhood call to mind and praise the works, the virtues, and the spirit of the Seraphic Patriarch."

    The title Seraphic Patriarch has only been assigned to Francis of Assisi. Bonaventure was called the Seraphic Doctor and Aquinas was the Angelic Doctor. The Church reserves such titles as seraphic and angelic for those men and women who have made outstanding and incomparable contributions to the Church and who have achieved great holiness that is worthy of special honours.

    He who called himself the “Herald of the Great King” was also rightly spoken of as “another Jesus Christ,” appearing to his contemporaries and to future generations almost as if he were the Risen Christ. He has always lived as such in the eyes of men and so will continue to live for all future time.

    Pope Pius goes on to say

    "He who called himself the “Herald of the Great King” was also rightly spoken of as “another Jesus Christ,”] appearing to his contemporaries and to future generations almost as if he were the Risen Christ. He has always lived as such in the eyes of men and so will continue to live for all future time. "**

    These are very powerful words to compare someone to the Risen Christ.

    "As a matter of fact, by his practice of all the virtues in a heroic manner, by the austerity of his life and his preaching of penance, by his manifold and restless activity for the reformation of society, the figure of Francis stands forth in all its completeness, proposed to us not so much for the admiration as for the imitation of Christian peoples."

    This is the source of the phrase “the saints’ Saint” came from. Many writers who picked up on Pius XI and Bonaventure’s writings coined this term. This is not a discouragement to venerate or imitate other saints. I don’t believe that the Church wants to do this. The Church simply attempts to express the highlights of each saint in her history and their place in the Christian community.

    Some will say, perhaps, that to restore Christian society another Francis is needed today. But We say, do what you can to make men take up again with renewed zeal the ancient Francis as their teacher of piety and sanctity; do what you can that they imitate and follow the example which he has left us, that they accept him as a man who was "a mirror of virtue, a path of righteousness, a rule of morals

    vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_30041926_rite-expiatis_en.html

    This is what Mystical Theologians mean when they refer to him as the Mirror of Perfection. It must be unerscored that all of this is made possible by the grace of God. Nonetheless, man must open himself to receiving grace and use them as they are given by the Creator.

    These documents are very lengthy and very beautiful. The point that they try to make is that all are called to this type of Christian perfection. It is not an exclusive call. The emphasis may be different for different persons and groups, but the goal is the same, the perfection of charity or the perfection of love.

    Fraternally,

    JR 🙂
 
Quoting on my Post (BarbaraTherese) in this Post:
http://forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=4226797&postcount=145


JR:

Barb replies*:*

In your quote above, JR, I have put in Bold what was niggling. By niggling I mean there is something not sitting right, but I cannot identify what it is. Having a reread tonight it is “he had achieved the perfection of The Gospel” is what would not sit right with me - can you tell me where this is stated, please, perhaps a link. “Achieved the perfection of The Gospel” needs really I think to have a reference as it is an awesome statement indeed. I can perhaps understand achieved the perfection of The Gospel as lived here on earth perhaps………….even that seems to me a very awesome statement. “Perfection of The Gospel” is an absolutely stunning thing to say to my mind and I don’t know how anyone could arrive at that on earth for sure. This is why, I would need a reference as to who said it and where, before I could accept it…and even with a Church authority as reference, it would not go down with me I am sorry - my mind just boggles at the statement totally and utterly and overwhelmingly…into disbelief of what you have said.

JR writes::

Barb replies
**

*A re read tonight has clarified why I was “niggled” last night by your statement. The Bold above defies my understanding. “being just as the Trininty simply is”??? *!? Again, my eyes nearly fell out my head when I read that and my mind was totally and utterly stunned…into disbelief at such a fantastic wild statement!

*God’s Blessings, JR…regards…Barb:) *
“Being as the Trinity is” means to be in the present. Some authors also use the phrase “the present moment.”

Hope this helps.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
Your post gave some beautiful testimony on St. Francis, JR. It is clear since you are a secular Franciscan, that you would have the highest veneration for him.

However, I believe the point Barb was trying to make is stated in the document you provided, where the Pope cautioned:
If some dare to compare one with another the heavenly heroes of sanctity destined by the Holy Ghost each to his own special mission among men - these comparisons, the fruit for the most part of party passions, are valueless and are at the same time an insult to God, the author of sanctity -

This is important for all of us to note, and I think was the basis of Barb’s concern, and mine as well in a PM to you.

You are correct that Francis was called “seraphic” by this Pope, and well he is. But so-called are other great saints of God. St. Catherine of Siena, St. Teresa of Avila and St. Clare are three that come to mind besides the ones you mentioned. It is possible that some others such as Padre Pio may also be granted that title, since he too bore the stigmata. I hear you imply that St. Francis was the Seraphic of seraphics, and that just may not be true even if the Pope himself believed it personally. Remember, there are other saints who have come to the forefront since this document was issued.

The point is that while a person may hold a particular saint in their highest veneration and rightly believe the saint is “seraphic” … that does not elevate St. Francis above all other saints in God’s kingdom. I realize that some will have a much greater degree of glory, as was explained by St. Teresa, but we know not who these may be until we get there to find out.
 
Your post gave some beautiful testimony on St. Francis, JR. It is clear since you are a secular Franciscan, that you would have the highest veneration for him.

However, I believe the point Barb was trying to make is stated in the document you provided, where the Pope cautioned:
If some dare to compare one with another the heavenly heroes of sanctity destined by the Holy Ghost each to his own special mission among men - these comparisons, the fruit for the most part of party passions, are valueless and are at the same time an insult to God, the author of sanctity -

This is important for all of us to note, and I think was the basis of Barb’s concern, and mine as well in a PM to you.

You are correct that Francis was called “seraphic” by this Pope, and well he is. But so-called are other great saints of God. St. Catherine of Siena, St. Teresa of Avila and St. Clare are three that come to mind besides the ones you mentioned. It is possible that some others such as Padre Pio may also be granted that title, since he too bore the stigmata. I hear you imply that St. Francis was the Seraphic of seraphics, and that just may not be true even if the Pope himself believed it personally. Remember, there are other saints who have come to the forefront since this document was issued.

The point is that while a person may hold a particular saint in their highest veneration and rightly believe the saint is “seraphic” … that does not elevate St. Francis above all other saints in God’s kingdom. I realize that some will have a much greater degree of glory, as was explained by St. Teresa, but we know not who these may be until we get there to find out.
When Franciscan writers use such language, they do not mean to say that Francis has a higher place in God’s kingdom. Nor do they mean to say that other saints should be compared and found to be lacking. As the Church and the encyclicals clearly say, the saints receive the gift of the Holy Spirit according to their special vocation and mission within the Church. This can be said for all of us.

Franciscan writers, which is where I get the terminology from, use this terminology to attract people to the manner in which Francis lived the Gospel and to demonstrate for the faithful how much God loves us and what God can achieve if like Francis we are willing cooperators with his grace.

As to the term Seraphic, I’ve never heard it applied to anyone other than Francis and Bonaventure. It has nothing to do with the Stigmata. The term was applied to mean someone who’s sanctity has an angelic quality to them. A very similar term is applied to Thomas Aquinas, the Angelic Doctor.

In many cases the Church wants to draw attention to a particular trait of a saint that it believes to be worthy of imitation. That’s how she comes up with such adjectives to describe them. You have others who have been called “The Great”, most of them popes.

What we have to look at is how these persons imitated Christ and how Christ worked in their lives and learn from them. They are given to us as teachers and guides to holiness.

In these same documents the popes also remind us that the holiness of Francis or any other saint is the work of God in the human soul. Granted, we know that the person has to choose to love God in return. This is the part that we can learn from and imitate. We can’t do God’s part, but we can imitate the love that was shown to God by the saints.

That being said, I believe that every Order is going to respond to a topic such as the one on this thread from their point of emphasis. This does not make them wrong. This is just their emphasis.

On the other hand, I don’t want to be the cause of distraction in this dicussion. Therefore, I think it’s time that I withdraw from it so that it can continue withou getting sidetracked. I’m not sure that I’m really making much of a contribution here.

I have enjoyed the fellowship and the exchange of thoughts and I thank everyone on the thread for it. It’s been fun. I really mean that. I apologize if anyone is offended by anything that I may have said or not said and should have. I don’t come to CAF to offend or hurt anyone. I’m just very enthusiastic about the whole area of spirituality.

Thanks for allowing me to share.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
Thank you very much for your clarification, JR. I don’t think there is any doubt about your enthusiasm for spirituality, and even less doubt about your esteem and veneration for St. Francis.

Your last post was toned down to a level that is credible and imitable. I think the problem arose when you tended to make of him more than the Church herself, and caused us to question your comments.
Finally, there are levels to the mystical life. Not every mystic reaches the same levels, nor does everyone go through all the levels in the same sequence. Sometimes a person may skip one. For example, St. Francis of Assisi never went through a Dark Night of the Soul or a Dark Night of the Senses. Mystical theologians and his biographers believe that it was unnecessary for him to go through those experiences as he had reached perfection long before.
What pertains to us is to seek to live according to the will of God by living the Gospel perfectly. This is what made Francis of Assisi the model for all saints. The Church proclaimed that he had achieved the perfection of the Gospel and thus was the perfect imitation of Christ and the Mirror of Perfection.
This seemed to be beyond what the Church would proclaim, for I doubt any of us ever reaches absolute perfection, as St. Teresa taught. Even in spiritual marriage, there is a potential for sin and imperfection.

This is what the Church had to say in the document previously supplied by you:
  1. It is Our desire that the religious and civic festivals to be held during this Centenary, as well as the conferences and sermons to be given, should aim at celebrating this anniversary with expressions of true devotion, without making the Seraphic Patriarch either totally different from other men or unlike the historical figure he actually was, but showing him a man gifted by nature and grace which admirably assisted him in reaching himself and in rendering easy for his neighbors the highest possible perfection.
“a mirror of virtue, a path of righteousness, a rule of morals.”
“Highest possible perfection” is a much toned down choice of words from what you had stated … yet I do understand your personal sentiments about St. Francis, of course. It is always prudent to confine language to the actual sentiments of the Church so as not to mislead.

Thanks again for your dedication in clearing up this difficulty. 🙂 It is really appreciated.

Carole
 
deborahaz


…I think perhaps the only time she focused on herself was in her letters. Focusing on others of course is a known method of deflecting from self and especially if one is going through a difficult time. The temptation with difficult times is to focus on oneself…she certainly never did this in her own sufferings.

Barb:)
Thanks, Barb. I needed that. I used to follow Mother Theresa to an extent - loved her - but don’t know about her “sufferings” - health? politics? criticisms? Guess I didn’t know enough about her except that she devoted her life to the poorest of the poor.
 
Thanks, Barb. I needed that. I used to follow Mother Theresa to an extent - loved her - but don’t know about her “sufferings” - health? politics? criticisms? Guess I didn’t know enough about her except that she devoted her life to the poorest of the poor.
Hi again CO:) …All the information I have picked up about Mother Teresa has been from texts I have read either about her, or quoting from her letters and I also think her diaries, but I am unsure of this. And from those, I have arrived at some conclusions of my own. I always followed all about her in the media while she was alive and thought her an astounding woman indeed and a very holy one…she certainly had fire in that very small and fragile frame!!! Astounding energy. That she should die the same day as Princess Diana I found very moving. The two greatest women probably of my lifetime, media figures of renown and popularity and always newsworthy for the headlines, die on the same day.
And I think all the media false conclusions about her writings have served The Lord well in that it has raised the whole subject of The Dark Night of The Soul (often totally misunderstood) and what it is and what it is not…and served to absolutely underscore the great holiness of Mother Teresa especially for those who actually followed her in the media, including when she was television, there was no indication at all of a woman who was suffering deeply in Faith…but I often wondered when I did see her television or pictures of her while she was alive, her tiny frame and face were those of an ascetic I thought. Also while she lived, I did read something about her Order and I thought they lived a quite strict, in fact very strict indeed, lifestyle. Mother Teresa for my was always an astounding figure and larger than life, much larger! And this bears out the great Graces including the Mystical Dark Night of The Soul that God granted her…a hidden spiritaulity from all around her, even her own sisters in religioun, in great humility, much similar to her predecessor
St. Therese of Lisieux.

Blessings and my regards…Barb
 
I’m not sure if I’m depressed or if this is one of those “dark night of the soul” things. It might be a little of both because I’m going through a rough time in my life right now. In either case, I’m having a really hard time praying lately. It’s even more difficult when things get really bad/sad and I know I have to pray even harder. It’s like no matter how hard I try to concentrate on my rosaries they feel like empty words like nobody is listening. Any tips on how to jump-start myself out of this? It’s really very frustrating. Help…
Hi Eli4n4 do you know why, the Saints go through the “dark night of the soul,” in layman’s terms, its to bring them to feel? In other words, to know intimately, compassion, mercy, understanding and genuine love. And how do they come to this intimacy of love, through the Cross. But it doesn’t necessarily resemble the Cross that Jesus was nailed to, that we fantasise about when we first start to walk with the Lord. No this is the Cross of the reality of life for instance you are not sure that your not suffering from depression. Well depression can be a shear in the Cross, if you don’t wallow in it. How? By the pain and the depths of despair, that you go through, you can understand and feel for others that are going through the same pain. Where as if, you did not have this pain, you couldn’t begin to know how they feel. With every Cross there is a Crown what is the Crown? It’s that one step closer to genuine love. And by our weakness and vonrability we can have compassion on the mistakes of others. The more we see ourselves as we [are] and not as we think we are the closer we will come to the fire of Divine Love.

The Lord says how can you say you love me if you don’t know my pain? :angel1:
God bless
Matt
 
Hi Eli4n4 do you know why, the Saints go through the “dark night of the soul,” in layman’s terms, its to bring them to feel? In other words, to know intimately, compassion, mercy, understanding and genuine love. And how do they come to this intimacy of love, through the Cross. But it doesn’t necessarily resemble the Cross that Jesus was nailed to, that we fantasise about when we first start to walk with the Lord. No this is the Cross of the reality of life for instance you are not sure that your not suffering from depression. Well depression can be a shear in the Cross, if you don’t wallow in it. How? By the pain and the depths of despair, that you go through, you can understand and feel for others that are going through the same pain. Where as if, you did not have this pain, you couldn’t begin to know how they feel. With every Cross there is a Crown what is the Crown? It’s that one step closer to genuine love. And by our weakness and vonrability we can have compassion on the mistakes of others. The more we see ourselves as we [are] and not as we think we are the closer we will come to the fire of Divine Love.

The Lord says how can you say you love me if you don’t know my pain? :angel1:
God bless
Matt
Thank you.

this was an old thread (don’t even know how ppl stumble on these old ones). but you have no idea how much i really needed that right now…so thanks 🙂
 
Originally Posted by patrickmwebb forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cab/viewpost.gif
*Hi Eli4n4 do you know why, the Saints go through the “dark night of the soul,” in layman’s terms, its to bring them to feel? In other words, to know intimately, compassion, mercy, understanding and genuine love. And how do they come to this intimacy of love, through the Cross. But it doesn’t necessarily resemble the Cross that Jesus was nailed to, that we fantasise about when we first start to walk with the Lord. No this is the Cross of the reality of life for instance you are not sure that your not suffering from depression. Well depression can be a shear in the Cross, if you don’t wallow in it. How? By the pain and the depths of despair, that you go through, you can understand and feel for others that are going through the same pain. Where as if, you did not have this pain, you couldn’t begin to know how they feel. With every Cross there is a Crown what is the Crown? It’s that one step closer to genuine love. And by our weakness and vonrability we can have compassion on the mistakes of others. The more we see ourselves as we [are] and not as we think we are the closer we will come to the fire of Divine Love.
The Lord says how can you say you love me if you don’t know my pain? :angel1:
God bless
Matt*
I am a bit late too, but the above really is an excellent post, Matt…Thank you very much indeed!👍 … a few posters struggling just now through dark times of suffering…

Barb:)

.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top