Dating someone who rides the fence about abortion and pre-marital sexuality

  • Thread starter Thread starter MJDorry
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you were to get serious, would she go through RCIA and become Catholic?
She’s very, very young. My kids are that age. That’s the idiot stage, in most cases, when people just parrot what sounds good.
If you thinks she has great integrity, love for God, and compassion for her fellow man, ask if she would go through RCIA with you.
Perhaps she will rethink her opinions. Doing what you want with your own body is fine, but abortion destroys someone else’s body. Anyone with any intelligence should be able to grasp that.
God bless.

.
 
I’m a 27-year old man and who’s been dating a 23 year-old woman over the past month-and-a-half. We hit it off in the beginning and were going on dates multiple times a week. She really is a great gal and we get along great for the most part. There’s chemistry and unbroken gazes when speaking. But as stated, there are issues, even if the issues are a bit more nuanced than as stated in the thread title.

She seems to be an otherwise strongly-believing Christian woman (I make caveats for the non-Catholics because I have not met any truly devout Catholic women), but her stance on abortion is a weird one. She says she would never have an abortion and that she thinks that all abortions are absolutely terrible, but that even in light of that, she doesn’t feel like it’s anybody’s place to tell a woman what she can do with her body.

She also believes that this is a sticking point for equality and women’s liberation. But I just don’t know how you can hold to completely morally contradicting positions—“abortion is horrible, but women should be allowed to legally and freely choose.”

And then there’s the matter of sexuality. She says that she’s completely fine waiting for marriage if that’s what the other person wants, but that waiting is not something she’d stick to if the “time felt right” and her s/o initiated.

I know the kind of man that I am. I am very sexually-minded. And as much faith as I have in the power of God to lift me, I’m not confident I would wait if I knew my s/o was willing to have sex before marriage. To this extent I’ve more recently sought women who were very much about waiting for marriage because I feel like together, we can accomplish that if that’s both our conviction.

What do I do here? Do these things represent a spiritual incompatibility that can be fraught with danger and pain down the road? Do they represent an opportunity to bridge that spiritual gap? Is it possible God put her in my path to direct her toward him through our relationship (should we enter into one)? Or is it possible that He put her in my path to give me the opportunity to choose the incredibly difficult thing of nipping this in light of spiritual difference? Or is God leaving this to a negative and a positive direction for both instances?

I told her today that these things weighed on me and that while I wanted to see her again, it was something I needed to seriously think about. And she said she was fine with that and understood, but she was very obviously still hurt by this sudden change in direction. To see that hurt started crushing me. Now I feel like **** for bringing it up so soon and leaving her hurt and hanging in the balance. I feel like I could be making a rash and extreme reaction to something that may not be big in the grand scheme, but I feel like these are things that the spirit of the relationship can sometimes hinge on.

If you have thoughts or experience, please share. 😦
How could her views and yours be compatible!?
 
So there is infatuation. You need a healthy dose of that in the beginning of the relationship. But it does not sustain a relationship. And it does sometimes obscure and play down real points of incompatibility.

I’m glad that you have not glossed over the signs this may not have long term potential

Maybe.

I think they point to some deeper things. She isn’t a Catholic, so how would she feel about raising children in the Catholic Church, the practice of the Catholic faith in the household (Lenten abstinence and fasting, Advent wreath, family rosary-- just for example)? She is OK with premarital sex, so she must favor contraception also. This begs the question regarding contraception in marriage. And finally, would she teach a future son or daughter these ideas or would she be OK teaching them Catholic morality on these matters of abortion, contraception, premarital sex, etc? Would she continue to see these things as tied in to her identity of a modern woman, the identity politics of equality? What other things does she see as equality issues? Gay marriage? Trans rights?

I think the ideas are worth exploring further, and I think it is better to know now than later. Yes, it hurts to have the optimism and infatuation of a new relationship crushed. It hurts a zillion times more to be crushed when you have grown to love someone and then tackle these issues.

DO NOT feel BAD of GUILTY. This is the purspose of discernment. What leads to danger down the road is not discernment, it’s a failure to discern or worse a failure to act on the results of discernment you really know you should.
I think you touch on the reality of what a future with her could look like. I had forgotten that she made an off-hand comment much earlier about not believing in “shoving her or her husband’s religion down her children’s throat”. I think that perhaps this indicates parenting incompatibility.
 
not believing in “shoving her or her husband’s religion down her children’s throat”
Yes, this is terribly misguided thinking and a major deal breaker for anyone who wants to live their faith as an integral part of their family life and raise faithful Catholic children.
 
I’m a 27-year old man and who’s been dating a 23 year-old woman over the past month-and-a-half. We hit it off in the beginning and were going on dates multiple times a week. She really is a great gal and we get along great for the most part. There’s chemistry and unbroken gazes when speaking. But as stated, there are issues, even if the issues are a bit more nuanced than as stated in the thread title.

She seems to be an otherwise strongly-believing Christian woman (I make caveats for the non-Catholics because I have not met any truly devout Catholic women), but her stance on abortion is a weird one. She says she would never have an abortion and that she thinks that all abortions are absolutely terrible, but that even in light of that, she doesn’t feel like it’s anybody’s place to tell a woman what she can do with her body.

😦
Dump her.
 
I more or less agree with her on the abortion stance. I would never dare have one myself, but who am I to tell someone what they can or cannot do. I would gladly tell a woman contemplating abortion why I feel it’s a bad idea and what other options they have. But I would not judge them for making the choice for themselves. I am not living their life, I have not suffered what they have, and I have absolutely no right to tell someone what they ought to do with their life. If she is open minded about sex before marriage, then that’s her thing. I think you should talk to her personally about this stuff more, and also talk to your priest and not people online, if you want to stay with this girl. She sounds pretty modern, and down to earth. She seems nice, but if you disagree on these things you best go separate ways or work to resolve them with someone who has experience talking with people on a daily basis face to face ( such as a priest ) because you can’t force someone to see things the way you do.
 
I dated a guy years ago who had fallen away from his Catholic faith due to his parents’ divorce and his mom’s remarriage. Also several of his aunts and uncles were divorced and remarried fallen away Catholics. They struck me as pretty laid back, worldly, and pragmatic. The boyfriend himself returned to Mass attendance but didn’t go to Confession before receiving Communion, I had to browbeat him into going to Mass on holydays. It was like he only had one foot in the door as far as the Church was concerned.

Like many deluded yet hopeful marriage minded young ladies, I was under the illusion that I could remold him into a fully practicing devout Catholic husband to be. Needless to say, I was wrong on that and many other assumptions, and that and other deal breakers finally made me see I had to pull the plug on the relationship. I suffered way more than I needed to because I had ignored the true desires of my heart for an illusion.

We remained in contact for awhile after the breakup, and eventually I witnessed him being drawn back to the liberalism and cafeteria Catholicism from whence he came. I’m very thankful now that I broke up with him because I can see what misery I avoided.

One thing to remember with your young lady is that if you do discern you’d be best to let her go (my vote, but it has to be your decision), you can find ways to soften the blow. Treat her with kindness, simply acknowledge the mismatch, and wish her well.
 
but who am I to tell someone what they can or cannot do.
Really? We should have no laws against murder, theft, rape, assault, speed limits, wearing a seatbelt, smoking in a restaurant, restrictions in neighborhoods on the color you can paint your house… because who are we to tell someone what they can or cannot do.

Of course we can. We do it all the time. And moreover, we SHOULD do it. We SHOULD have laws that prevent murder (which abortion is). We SHOULD have laws that say in unequivocal terms, “this is not right and people should not do it”.

Only in the absurd world of abortion rights can we “not” tell someone what to do.
 
The chemistry, unbroken gazes, affection, and passion come in cycles in a long relationship. They will wax and wane like the moon tides. When they are at their lowest, all you will have to bind you together are your shared values, devotion, and belief in the indissolubility of marriage. If you don’t have those, maintaining a marriage will be extremely difficult during the low periods.
 
Really? We should have no laws against murder, theft, rape, assault, speed limits, wearing a seatbelt, smoking in a restaurant, restrictions in neighborhoods on the color you can paint your house… because who are we to tell someone what they can or cannot do.

Of course we can. We do it all the time. And moreover, we SHOULD do it. We SHOULD have laws that prevent murder (which abortion is). We SHOULD have laws that say in unequivocal terms, “this is not right and people should not do it”.

Only in the absurd world of abortion rights can we “not” tell someone what to do.
Yeah, no. Your examples are arbitrary.I find it most amusing you bring up seat belts as one example, because seat belts save lives. Abortion in some situations, such as ectopic pregnancies…save lives. I don’t advocate for people going out and using abortion freely as a form of birth control or as a quick fix every time they mess up. You do not lord over the land, and do not own a woman like a slave and she can legally have an abortion if she so chooses. God gave us free will, and you need to respect that and let the woman suffer the consequences of her own actions if she so chooses that path after you kindly advise her against it. If you are going to try and talk people into not getting an abortion, you need to have some understanding, compassion, and common ground. You cannot tell people birth control is evil, while at the same time prevent them from having free will and choosing their own life path should they happen to get pregnant. Are you going to help a impoverished mother raise that child, feed it, clothe it, and offer it a stable home if you talk her out of an abortion and adoption isn’t an option for her? If that child suffers abuse at the hands of a mother who didn’t want it or was properly prepared to have it are you going to atone for that? Are you going to look a little child bride in the eye and tell her that it is her fault that her pedophile husband raped her, and impregnated her and her life is now ruined and at stake because her body is too little to birth without risk? Are you going to be the one to tell a helpless pregnant woman who is having internal bleeding and hemorrhaging that she has to suffer and die for an unviable fetus? No? Then you are not pro-life you are pro-birth.
 
Yeah, no. Your examples are arbitrary.
Not arbitrary, all things either illegal or regulated. All examples of not having autonomy over everything.
I find it most amusing you bring up seat belts as one example, because seat belts save lives.
Abortion takes lives.
Abortion in some situations, such as ectopic pregnancies…save lives.
Red herring. Abortion is never permissible. Including ectopic pregnancies. One may treat the diseased tube, one may not give chemicals to attack the child.
she can legally have an abortion if she so chooses.
This is, unofrtunately, a true statement.
God gave us free will, and you need to respect that and let the woman suffer the consequences of her own actions if she so chooses that path after you kindly advise her against it. If you are going to try and talk people into not getting an abortion, you need to have some understanding, compassion, and common ground. You cannot tell people birth control is evil, while at the same time prevent them from having free will and choosing their own life path should they happen to get pregnant. Are you going to help a impoverished mother raise that child, feed it, clothe it, and offer it a stable home if you talk her out of an abortion and adoption isn’t an option for her? If that child suffers abuse at the hands of a mother who didn’t want it or was properly prepared to have it are you going to atone for that? Are you going to look a little child bride in the eye and tell her that it is her fault that her pedophile husband raped her, and impregnated her and her life is now ruined and at stake because her body is too little to birth without risk? Are you going to be the one to tell a helpless pregnant woman who is having internal bleeding and hemorrhaging that she has to suffer and die for an unviable fetus? No? Then you are not pro-life you are pro-birth.
And now we are out in propaganda land,
 
And she said she was fine with that and understood, but she was very obviously still hurt by this sudden change in direction. To see that hurt started crushing me. Now I feel like **** for bringing it up so soon and leaving her hurt and hanging in the balance. I feel like I could be making a rash and extreme reaction to something that may not be big in the grand scheme, but I feel like these are things that the spirit of the relationship can sometimes hinge on.

If you have thoughts or experience, please share. 😦
Not sure if this will help, but having been in sort of a similar situation, it might be worthwhile to think about your issue within the larger context of your relationship. Yes, she is hurt now, but having this conversation now is MUCH better than later. I would also echo what someone else has said about really slowing things down. Keep emotions on the side (so difficult, i know). There may be (or not) other things you won’t be compatible with, and while you are not willing to make compromises with respect to your faith, she may feel pressured to do things just to please you. Do you *know *who she is? I would hear more about her perspective, particularly note the ones which are most consistent and make decision from there.

I once went out with someone who also had very different views on marriage and sexuality than mine (mind you, more extreme than the views your gf shares). I lamented for so long after I ended things with him, and when I talked to him again one year later (when most of my attraction towards him had been gone), we got into a frustrating argument…and it was then I realized I had made the right decision.

Hope this helps. It’s your decision! Most importantly, ask our Lady to guide it! 🙂
 
And now we are out in propaganda land,
Not propaganda, you just don’t want to face the truth that there are situations in this world that are not black and white. Also ectopic pregnancies cannot be treated with chemicals, so not sure why that was even brought up and its not “a diseased tube” or anything of the sort. Its a very rare occurrence but it still happens and the only way to save the mothers life is to remove the child, sometimes the tube has to go with it and if that surgery is not done she will surely die from internal bleeding due to a ruptured organ. In an ideal world, abortions wouldn’t happen. They are a terrible thing for both mother and child. But there are some rare instances where it is medically necessary. But we will have to agree to disagree, you’re entitled to your stance and I understand your sentiment.
 
Not propaganda, you just don’t want to face the truth that there are situations in this world that are not black and white. Also ectopic pregnancies cannot be treated with chemicals, so not sure why that was even brought up and its not “a diseased tube” or anything of the sort. Its a very rare occurrence but it still happens and the only way to save the mothers life is to remove the child, sometimes the tube has to go with it and if that surgery is not done she will surely die from internal bleeding due to a ruptured organ. In an ideal world, abortions wouldn’t happen. They are a terrible thing for both mother and child. But there are some rare instances where it is medically necessary. But we will have to agree to disagree, you’re entitled to your stance and I understand your sentiment.
Perhaps it may be helpful to distinguish between abortion and legitimate medical intervention.
Abortion = The deliberate destruction of the child in the womb.
Medical intervention = A procedure to save the life of the mother which results in the death if the child as a side effect.

They are very different things. Abortion is never necessary or permissible to save the mother’s life. Anyone who says otherwise is twisting the facts.

As Catholics we are required to make an attempt to understand the reasoning behind the Church’s teaching and not attack it without actually knowing the full truth.
IMO, it’s fairly obvious that abortion is immoral. As Cardinal Sarah said: “Even the first communion kids can see that it’s wrong”.
 
I told her today that these things weighed on me and that while I wanted to see her again, it was something I needed to seriously think about. And she said she was fine with that and understood, but she was very obviously still hurt by this sudden change in direction. To see that hurt started crushing me. Now I feel like **** for bringing it up so soon and leaving her hurt and hanging in the balance. I feel like I could be making a rash and extreme reaction to something that may not be big in the grand scheme, but I feel like these are things that the spirit of the relationship can sometimes hinge on.

If you have thoughts or experience, please share. 😦
I have some experience of dating a woman who was a Cafeteria Catholic. She didn’t really have any strong opinions on important issues and tended toward thinking that people should be allowed to do what they like regarding things like SSM. When it came to the pro-life issue she wasn’t really interested in going to any events or helping out with that cause. It wasn’t a big deal for her to miss mass and she sort of thought confession was unnecessary because “God forgives you anyway”.

While she was still catholic, she wasn’t the woman I wanted to be the mother of my children due to the fact that I want my children to get to heaven, and the best chance of that happening is if they have a good example of Catholicism from their parents.

It also irritated me that she was so apathetic about things like abortion or SSM.

While it may have been hard at the time, breaking up was the best thing to do.

In the end I met a devout Catholic lady (on this site actually) and we are now married.
My advice would be to end this relationship. The whole point of dating is to discern. You don’t “have” to stay with this person. And if you do you are likely depriving yourself of the chance to meet a good spouse for you, and her of the opportunity to meet a spouse that will be better suited to her.
 
Perhaps it may be helpful to distinguish between abortion and legitimate medical intervention.
Abortion = The deliberate destruction of the child in the womb.
Medical intervention = A procedure to save the life of the mother which results in the death if the child as a side effect.

They are very different things. Abortion is never necessary or permissible to save the mother’s life. Anyone who says otherwise is twisting the facts.

As Catholics we are required to make an attempt to understand the reasoning behind the Church’s teaching and not attack it without actually knowing the full truth.
IMO, it’s fairly obvious that abortion is immoral. As Cardinal Sarah said: “Even the first communion kids can see that it’s wrong”.
I agree, and that makes more sense. I am against abortion and consider myself pro-life in all forms, but I am supportive of medical intervention where necesessary and feel people shouldn’t suffer when it can be helped. The thought of that happening is very frightening. I think telling women outright that its O.K to have an abortion is wrong and it’s our job as catholics to inform them of the truth but to also show charity and mercy when they go agaisnt god’s will, god forgives as should we and sadly in this secular world people have taken abortion too far and it’s far too easy to access. There needs to be A LOT more services put in place to teach women about adoption, and if more women were willing to give for adoption, there would be less abortions and less IVF. I have always disagreed with abortion and have known plenty young mothers who opted for adoption rather than abortion and felt a lot better going through life knowing their child was placed in a loving home rather than being killed. I used to have a friend who was adopted from Taiwan, she was a lovely person and didn’t know her real mother or father but she had a lovely upbringing. I think we should show these women who are lied to by abortionist’s compassion, and educate them more on this stuff. Make sure they realize that orphanages are not like they were in the 1800’s, that kids actually go to wonderful homes.
 
She says she would never have an abortion and that she thinks that all abortions are absolutely terrible, but that even in light of that, she doesn’t feel like it’s anybody’s place to tell a woman what she can do with her body.
If a man wanted to use his body to rape a woman, would she say she doesn’t feel like it’s anybody’s place to tell him what he can do with his body? Similarily, if he wanted to strangle someone with his hands, would she say she doesn’t feel like it’s anybody’s place to tell him what he can do with his body?
 
Have you asked her yet if she would convert?

I think a measure of Catholic values should be adhered to Catholics. If a non Catholic has some of the basic values, education and/in faith would instil the solid values.
 
Have you asked her yet if she would convert?

I think a measure of Catholic values should be adhered to Catholics. If a non Catholic has some of the basic values, education and/in faith would instil the solid values.
And maybe that works sometimes, but personally, I think I’d really rather not hold someone’s hand through faith. I want to be with someone who is arm-in arm with me to the letter-of-the law. And maybe this gal could be her down the road, but is it worth waiting to find out? I don’t think so, but that’s why I ask because I could be wrong in my mentality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top