I never read this book nor do I plan to in fear of losing my faith but I DO know that some brave Catholics read this book and lived to tell the tale. I need help considering whether to read this or not or to read another book that somehow debunks this?
The difficulty with your position is that if you don’t tackle books like these you might get the bug in your brain that they actually say something meaningful that ‘might’ challenge your faith because they might have in them some piece of evidence that you never considered. That niggling doubt might create issues for you until it is faced head on.
On the other hand, perhaps you don’t know the substance of Catholicism well enough and might be persuaded by what is contained in the ‘arguments’ simply because of lacks in your own understanding.
I would suggest that you listen to this talk by David Bentley Hart on the 'new atheists."
youtu.be/qYWEYuhiWzE
He does a very nice job of simplifying the arguments from the point of view of a professional philosopher to show, precisely, where they fail. If you have the capacity to follow the train of Hart’s logic, you are probably ready to take on one of the atheist authors.
On the other hand, after listening to Hart, you might completely lose any inclination for wanting to read such books since they are so lacking in redeeming quality.
Another book that often gets missed is one written by a computer programmer by the name of Vox Day. The book is called The Irrational Atheist. It is available as a free PDF or ePub at
goodreads.com/ebooks/download/1142464.The_Irrational_Atheist. He takes on the atheist books of Dawkins, Harris, Hitchens and Dennett from the perspective of their “facts” about Christianity. He is very meticulous about issues such as the role of religion as a catalyst for war, crime statistics involving believers and atheists, and the role of atheism in genocide, among other topics.
His precision, for one thing, points out how woefully inadequate the new atheists are in terms of securing the kind of evidence they purport to be so interested in basing their ‘knowledge’ upon.