S
switalabe
Guest
Yet another thing – to answer my own question about whether naval infantry forces are “tougher” than other service branches generally: one reason that naval infantry might be “tougher” than normal land based infantry is that the number of people that can fit on a boat is less than the number of people that can fit on a “normal-sized” piece of land. So, in an amphibious assault type situation where naval infantry are pitted against normal land-based infantry, the marines are more likely to be outnumbered. Thus, they need to maximize their fighting capability to overcome the land-based opponent??? Just my speculation.
Plus, if the marines are in charge of ship-board security … well, sailors might be tougher folk than landlubber civilians, so the marines would need to be even tougher than the sailors in order to overcome them in case of things like mutinies. But I think I’ve read the USMC doesn’t have that role for the US Navy any longer anyway.
Plus, if the marines are in charge of ship-board security … well, sailors might be tougher folk than landlubber civilians, so the marines would need to be even tougher than the sailors in order to overcome them in case of things like mutinies. But I think I’ve read the USMC doesn’t have that role for the US Navy any longer anyway.