Dealing with the Gay family member at Christmas

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bassmanjr1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
We don’t live 600 years ago. I think people nowadays are smart enough to differentiate the difference between what constitutes romance nowadays vs. what constitutes friendship.
If something was morally fine when the Church was at the apex of power then why would it be bad now?
That isn’t a matter of intelligence.
Homosexuality general implies living the lifestyle, including the sex. Church groups generally use SSA (same sex attraction) to indicate the inclination, rather than the act.

God Bless
No not really, the Church in the Catechism uses terms such as homosexual tendencies and homosexual inclination to refer to what some Catholics call same sex attraction, in Latin they use homosexualitas.
 
To remind you, this was your original statement. You were in the wrong and should retract this statement.

If you don’t know anything about the topic, then don’t make these assertions.
I did not. I stated that BEING homosexual is not wrong. I stated nothing in that original post that said being in a homosexual relationship is okay.
 
The church does not really view homosexuality as a sin or anything bad anymore, so as long as they are not married then it is not a problem. Marriage between two men (or women) is what the church really frowns upon.
When did the Church teach same sex attraction was a sin?
 
A statement like this is passive aggressive. When andrew stated something contrary to church teaching, and “backed it up” with a source, and then further persisted, Juliane could have done nothing less than refuting it in the way she did in order to avoid the misinformation of other Catholics. You are just piling on and supporting a person who is stating an erroneous belief.
Oh really? Is it impossible to word things with respect? Read what she wrote. Not hard to re-write that in terms that could get the point across but also steer him in the right direction.
 
Andrew,

Sometimes wording can be confusing. What others are trying to say that the sexual act out of marriage is not allowed, whether the couple is gay or straight.

A friendship may be called by definition a type of elationship, but when most adults use the phrase “I am in a relationship” then do not mean “I have a friendship with someone” – otherwise they would say “this is my friend”. The implication of the word “relationship” implies intimacy.

If you look at the OP it was concerning a specific situation. A gay child is coming home for Christmas with a significant other and about the two sharing a room. The consensus is that the parents have a right in their home to set the rules and that if they do not allow couples (either straight or gay) who are unmarried to share a bedroom they must communicate this to the couple and stand by their moral principles

By your own admission you are 16 and don’t have much knowledge on the subject. Nothing wrong with that. But as a priest once said to me, “God gave us two ears and one mouth for a reason” Think of your fingers typing on the keyboard as your online “mouth”. In other words, think and pause before opening your “mouth”.

Does this mean you should never challenge or ask questions? Of course not – but there are ways to ask and challenge and *accept *the feedback you receive. There are primarily adults on this board and if you are going to participate then you need to think about how you are presenting yourself when you say things like “I don’t know your age, and I don’t care to your know age” Frankly, you sounded like a smart-mouth rather than a person honestly seeking clarification. Is everyone on this forum perfect? No, of course not – but most try to be civil to one another.

Ask yourself, who would you want to spend time with online or in person - a smart mouth or a person seeking clarification?

BTW, being 16 is not an excuse 🙂

With attempt to be charitable,

Coachdennis
I appreciate it. This forum isn’t for me though. I’m not a fan of being attacked on the internet, no matter what the poster’s intent was. Not the way I’ve been raised to speak, and certainly not the “Catholic” way.
 
many of the people on this site are unpleasant. which is unfortunate considering what this site is about. like someone said before, quit trying to be “know it alls” and actually LIVE like a Catholic. how would the Lord explain this to someone who is ignorant on the topic? certainly not like that. you are just driving people away from the faith who are looking to grow in their faith. don’t worry-- not everyone is like this, Andrew. not the way i’ve been taught either.
 
No not really, the Church in the Catechism uses terms such as homosexual tendencies and homosexual inclination to refer to what some Catholics call same sex attraction, in Latin they use homosexualitas.
And the use of those particular words in those particular documents is not intended to be limiting.
 
many of the people on this site are unpleasant. which is unfortunate considering what this site is about. like someone said before, quit trying to be “know it alls” and actually LIVE like a Catholic. how would the Lord explain this to someone who is ignorant on the topic? certainly not like that. you are just driving people away from the faith who are looking to grow in their faith. don’t worry-- not everyone is like this, Andrew. not the way i’ve been taught either.
I note that when an argument arises over this one particular topic the issue is mostly not addressed but the argument turns to “tone”. Why not stop complaining about this tone or that tone and simply stick to the argument?

Other heated issues here like abortion and contraception do not give rise to this type of complaint.
 
Andrew- may I recommend www.christianguitar.org if you are still interested in communicating with other Catholics on the internet. i read in another thread u play guitar at ur local parish so check it out if u are interested. there is a forum there as well.
 
I note that when an argument arises over this one particular topic the issue is mostly not addressed but the argument turns to “tone”. Why not stop complaining about this tone or that tone and simply stick to the argument?

Other heated issues here like abortion and contraception do not give rise to this type of complaint.
because i don’t just care about the argument. i care about the faith. this is supposed to be a catholic community.
 
because i don’t just care about the argument. i care about the faith. this is supposed to be a catholic community.
The argument is not separate from the faith. Too often we are quick to claim offense.
 
I appreciate it. This forum isn’t for me though. I’m not a fan of being attacked on the internet, no matter what the poster’s intent was. Not the way I’ve been raised to speak, and certainly not the “Catholic” way.
Andrew,

I’m sorry to say this, but if you think THIS is “being attacked” then I’m afraid you have very thin skin and won’t fare well on any internet website. This isn’t a family; do you expect the world to coddle you and say “good job, you tried” when you say something wrong?

I think I have to say the same to mannyo249. The purpose of a discussion is not to feel all warm and fluffy, especially on such a topic as this. You can expect to be disagreed with.

Quote to me one phrase that was unwarranted and disrespectful by Juliane.
 
Back to what this thread was initially about… 🙂
Stand firm. If you don’t care more for your child’s immortal soul than their earthly joy, what kind of parent are you.
In my opinion, once you’ve told the child (who is an adult by the way) what you think, then it’s time to back down. As for it being about their immortal soul, you are not going to be saving their immortal soul by making them get a hotel or separate rooms. They’re going right back to it once they leave anyway.

I now wish I had never followed people’s advice online when I told my daughter and her boyfriend they had to have separate rooms at our house (even though they live together otherwise). It caused a rift in our relationship that has been there ever since. I wish I had just told her what I thought was right/wrong and let it go at that. As adults, we have to let our children make their decisions. You can’t force them to live by your morals, or even God’s morals. They have to make that choice. To force them, as someone else stated, may damage the relationship forever. Even if you say it is out of respect for you, they are still your children and will not see it that way.

Guess we all have to decide what works best for us and for our own children.
 
If something was morally fine when the Church was at the apex of power then why would it be bad now?
Because times change. This isn’t a matter of changing doctrine, but a change of what’s socially acceptable.
 
Back to what this thread was initially about… 🙂

In my opinion, once you’ve told the child (who is an adult by the way) what you think, then it’s time to back down. As for it being about their immortal soul, you are not going to be saving their immortal soul by making them get a hotel or separate rooms. They’re going right back to it once they leave anyway.

I now wish I had never followed people’s advice online when I told my daughter and her boyfriend they had to have separate rooms at our house (even though they live together otherwise). It caused a rift in our relationship that has been there ever since. I wish I had just told her what I thought was right/wrong and let it go at that. As adults, we have to let our children make their decisions. You can’t force them to live by your morals, or even God’s morals. They have to make that choice. To force them, as someone else stated, may damage the relationship forever. Even if you say it is out of respect for you, they are still your children and will not see it that way.

Guess we all have to decide what works best for us and for our own children.
Why did it cause a rift?

When my fiance and I stay with my family we share a room, with his we sleep apart. (And we’ve only done that once, hotels for us after that.) Of course we feel more welcomed and accepted by my family, but we love his too so we humor it. It does mean that when money is a little tighter we don’t visit them as much, and of course we feel closer to my family because they accept and are happy about our relationship just the way it is.

But I don’t think any of us would ever let something like that cause a rift in the family.
 
Why did it cause a rift?
Because I was trying to tell her what to do and it was not my usual character. She was offended (yes, she has very strong opinions). We’ve talked about it since but things are not the same. The relationship is not broken, just not the same.
 
Originally Posted by andrewp13
I appreciate it. This forum isn’t for me though. I’m not a fan of being attacked on the internet, no matter what the poster’s intent was. Not the way I’ve been raised to speak, and certainly not the “Catholic” way.
begone, troll.
In my opinion, once you’ve told the child (who is an adult by the way) what you think, then it’s time to back down.
Yes, because “backing down” is one of the precepts of the Church. Oh wait, no isn’t. In fact, you are completely wrong.
As for it being about their immortal soul, you are not going to be saving their immortal soul by making them get a hotel or separate rooms. They’re going right back to it once they leave anyway.
You don’t quite get what a “soul” is, do ya? In point of fact, the not allowing the homo-abuse in his home is one way the OP saves his OWN soul. The speaking out, consistently and firmly with parental authority against the homo-abuse is how he attempts to save the child’s soul by working upon the child’s conscience…
 
Why did it cause a rift?

When my fiance and I stay with my family we share a room, with his we sleep apart. (And we’ve only done that once, hotels for us after that.) Of course we feel more welcomed and accepted by my family, but we love his too so we humor it. It does mean that when money is a little tighter we don’t visit them as much, and of course we feel closer to my family because they accept and are happy about our relationship just the way it is.

But I don’t think any of us would ever let something like that cause a rift in the family.
Some folks are just mellower about these issues, I guess. I can see both sides of it, honestly. And a whole lot depends on how the message is delivered. Sometimes, it’s hard to lay down the rules of the house and say that unmarried couples need to sleep apart, without making it sound like you disapprove of them sleeping together anywhere else. The latter is a deeper judgment about someone’s life choices, and that certainly has the potential to rub people the wrong way.

Not saying this is what happened in AnneTeresa’s case - maybe the daughter was going to have a problem no matter how the message got delivered.

And still others would handle it with aplomb - just the way it sounds like you did it.
 
Some folks are just mellower about these issues, I guess. I can see both sides of it, honestly. And a whole lot depends on how the message is delivered. Sometimes, it’s hard to lay down the rules of the house and say that unmarried couples need to sleep apart, without making it sound like you disapprove of them sleeping together anywhere else. The latter is a deeper judgment about someone’s life choices, and that certainly has the potential to rub people the wrong way.

Not saying this is what happened in AnneTeresa’s case - maybe the daughter was going to have a problem no matter how the message got delivered.

And still others would handle it with aplomb - just the way it sounds like you did it.
Well clearly if you want them to sleep apart in your home you disapprove of them sleeping together anywhere.

The way I see it its about picking your battles. I would encourage parents of adult children to leave the issue alone. If they really feel like they can’t then I would encourage adult children to just humor it. If they really feel like they can’t then there needs to be some long talks and open communication. It may very well be that the child and parents have conflicting values and that the relationship won’t be one that is as close as they were both hoping for, but there shouldn’t be a rift.

Yes, when you are told that “We know you’re in love and that you live together but we just won’t let you share a bed here” it does feel patronizing and condescending. But people you love are going to make you feel negative things your entire life, so its best to get over the ones that don’t have to ruin relationships, and that one certainly doesn’t need to ruin a relationship. We don’t like playing the game of pretending to be less serious than we are for someone else’s sensibilities, so we get a hotel room. Problem solved. And like I said before its better to have a quiet, private place to go back to anyway.

Its a shame that her relationship with her daughter was damaged over this.
 
Sometimes, it’s hard to lay down the rules of the house and say that unmarried couples need to sleep apart, without making it sound like you disapprove of them sleeping together anywhere else.
Ah, this is why I love ModernAmericanAnswers.com and the AmericanAnswers Forums. Great place to get advice. Especially for Americans.

😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top