M
Marfran
Guest
The camera doesn’t lie. bit.ly/7Ii3H Please watch the entire video so we can discuss.
BEEF its what’s for dinner…No thanks. This is not respect for God’s creation.The camera doesn’t lie. bit.ly/7Ii3H Please watch the entire video so we can discuss.
I second this kennewickmike! Not for me or my family.BEEF its what’s for dinner…No thanks. This is not respect for God’s creation.
I watched the video and squirmed in my chair the whole time. I didn’t want to watch it and I even felt physical nausea. And I would imagine that the video is a PG version of what happens every day millions of times. You have to wonder about being so removed from this process, and how that affects one’s decision to eat meat without guilt.I never understood how a person could care so much about the life of an animal, though and not the life of a plant. It’s like plants are disposable and we can do anything we want with them. Rip them out of the ground, tear them to shreds, eat them right from the ground (you do realize they are still living when you eat a salad or raw veggie, I’m sure) and there is absolutely no concern that we just ended life by eating that.
Perhaps someone could enlighten me on this, because ever since I was young, I have never understood how someone could say that one life is more important than another (regarding the consumption of animals vs plants anyway). That all said, this was a horrible video, but I dont’ see any immorality in it, just brutality. But how exactly is one supposed to kill a cow? I’m not very familiar with slaughter techniques myself, so there very well may be a better way, it’s just that I can’t imagine any right now.
As for the camera doesn’t lie - I never believe cameras anymore. They could be tampered with and the sound here after the camera goes black does seem to be overlaid and unnatural after what just happened, since the cow was either unconcious or dead already (we don’t know, they could have injected it with something or painlessly knocked it unconcious before they killed it,
This is my view and hopefully did not come across as uncivil. I just presented my view of what I witnessed and how I interpreted it. Also, I would like an answer to my plant question above, on why plants are so inferior and deserve to die while animals do not. This is not a provocative statement - it is a genuine plea to get a viable answer to what I have wondered about almost my whole life. I have gotten answers from people, but I have never gotten any that I truly understood and made sense to me.
Simply:This is my view and hopefully did not come across as uncivil. I just presented my view of what I witnessed and how I interpreted it. Also, I would like an answer to my plant question above, on why plants are so inferior and deserve to die while animals do not. This is not a provocative statement - it is a genuine plea to get a viable answer to what I have wondered about almost my whole life. I have gotten answers from people, but I have never gotten any that I truly understood and made sense to me.
Thanks…![]()
First of all, I would like to point out that this plant probably is not in the United States. Now, let me speak for a bit as someone who grew up on a farm where we raised cattle for food.The camera doesn’t lie. bit.ly/7Ii3H Please watch the entire video so we can discuss.
Nope, but the person that posted this on youtube does.The camera doesn’t lie.
When people respond uncharitably it is very difficult not to question their motivation too. Is it possible to simply post that one disagrees with the conclusion that another has made?Nope, but the person that posted this on youtube does.
I am immedietely suspicious given that the poster made claim to the cow being sentient, aware of death, and not wanting to die.
All of that cannot be known.
An earlier poster noted that there is brutality and it makes one question eating meat.
No, it doesn’t. At least not I.
As far as brutality goes, there seems to be very little.
From what can be gleaned from the film, there seems to be a loud pop, and the cow drops immedietely. This would indicate a quick (if not instant) death.
Questioning meat consumption…not as likely as questioning the motivations of the people behind this film.
As a vegan making no claim to any moral position in relationship to another… however animals do not need to be killed, either this way or some other, to produce some types of fertilizer. It is very difficult however - as you note - to try to eliminate all of the ways animal products are used in our lives (i.e. I understand animal byproducts are used in car tires) so it is completely impossible to be 100% vegan - I just chose to try to eliminate use of animal products as much as possible. Not just in response to cruelty issues, but also resources, environmental impact, impact on people working in this industry.I would also like to point out that the chances of your vegetables not being fertilized with animal by-products (feces, intestines, fat, ground bone, etc.) is almost zero. Even most of the “organic” vegetables (BTW: I’d really like to see an inorganic vegetable sometime) are fertilized with such things, because these things are organic. This is what really makes me laugh about vegetarians who claim to be of higher moral caliber because they don’t eat meat. Unless you grow every single thing you eat you, most likely, are eating recycled animal products.
You are certainly right about this… very sadFinally, this is not really that inhumane of a way to kill meat. Do you know how they kill the food dogs in Korea? They chase them down the street with baseball bats beating them to death because the adrenaline makes the meat sweeter. Now that is cruel.
My dog reacts this way to going to the vet too — she just hates it, even though it is for her good.I own cows and horses. They react this way even when you are trying to do something good to them, like spray something on them to keep inch-long flies from biting them.
They are prey animals, that is how God made them to protect them. They do not rationally assess a situation and consider whether it’s dangerous or not; they just get away fast from anything which scares them. And they don’t know the difference between being about to get slaughtered or being about to get medicine when they are sick and will react the same way to either.
It kind of answers my question, but not satisfactorily enough to stop eating meat. To me, life is life - whether we think it can feel pain or not. Picking and choosing which type of life is okay to eat seems to me to be personal preference, especially since some animals have a very rudimentary nervous system with no brain and don’t seem to respond to touch or pain while some plants can feel touch and respond to it immediately much as an animal would. Scripturally as Christians, there is no basis for not eating meat, especially after St. Peter recieved his vision from God that all meat is “clean”. Since it is not a sin to eat meat (other than Catholic days of abstinence) or to kill an animal for meat, it is not necessary to make one feel guilty, belittled or inadequate because they eat meat (and I’m not suggesting you did such a thing, but I know some do).Simply:
Animals are able to move, while plants remain stationary.
Animals also have a complex nervous system that can perform many tasks, while plants lack a brain
Animals will react and recoil from pain - my tomatoes don’t do that…
Is this the type of answer you were looking for? What other kind of answers have you had that didn’t completely answer the question for you?
There is the simple differences and perhaps looking on it as we and animals take plants, consume them and turn them into energy making them part of our life.
Today it is possible - to live quite well in the United States - on a plant based diet for most people - so we can remove ourselves from this killing of animals with brains, animals that recoil from pain, and we can survive quite well.
Snerticus;5393578 said:Animals possess some human features (eyes, nose, bones, muscles, etc), so we tend to humanize them and feel compassion. The same is not true with a plant. I suppose it is the same reason so many fail to recognize the human nature of a pre-born child.
In the film. how many of us looked at the cow and envisioned that it was us in that trough? I thought the cow looked well fed and met a quick and painless death. He was never really made to suffer with the exception of a bit of anxiety.
Yesterday, I read the gospel passage where Jesus tells Peter to put out to the deep. Peter, who had been toiling all day trying to catch fish, was commanded by Jesus to cast the nets into the water. The catch was so large it filled two boats and nearly sank them.
If Jesus was opposed to using animals for human consumption, why would he have made it so that all of those fish were made to be ensnared. Maybe some of the fish, realizing they were no longer free to swim away, also experienced a little trepidation?
Animals are made for man. Losing sight of that reality clouds our judgement. While, I believe that we should be respectful of God’s gift of nature, I see no travesty in slaughtering an animal so that people could eat.
Thanks for the respectIt kind of answers my question, but not satisfactorily enough to stop eating meat. I really respected her for that. Up until that time, I thought that every vegetarian on the planet hated people who ate meat. I’m seeing here that some have very little respect for us, while others are willing to concede that not everyone shares their views. While I don’t share your views, I do respect that you choose to follow them.
And that’s fine by me.
Snert
thank you for this this gentle responseAnimals possess some human features (eyes, nose, bones, muscles, etc), so we tend to humanize them and feel compassion. The same is not true with a plant. I suppose it is the same reason so many fail to recognize the human nature of a pre-born child.
In the film. how many of us looked at the cow and envisioned that it was us in that trough? I thought the cow looked well fed and met a quick and painless death. He was never really made to suffer with the exception of a bit of anxiety.
Yesterday, I read the gospel passage where Jesus tells Peter to put out to the deep. Peter, who had been toiling all day trying to catch fish, was commanded by Jesus to cast the nets into the water. The catch was so large it filled two boats and nearly sank them.
If Jesus was opposed to using animals for human consumption, why would he have made it so that all of those fish were made to be ensnared. Maybe some of the fish, realizing they were no longer free to swim away, also experienced a little trepidation?
Animals are made for man. Losing sight of that reality clouds our judgement. While, I believe that we should be respectful of God’s gift of nature, I see no travesty in slaughtering an animal so that people could eat.
apologies if I have come off as too abrasive.When people respond uncharitably it is very difficult not to question their motivation too. Is it possible to simply post that one disagrees with the conclusion that another has made?![]()
Thank you for recognizing thatapologies if I have come off as too abrasive.
However somone needs to call the poster of that video on the deception that is intentionally put in there.