Death, Lies, & Videotape

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marfran
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
My point exactly–we are no longer cave men, we are well beyond primitive, we have developed alternatives to meat (and healthier ones at that). Now that we are more advanced, more civillized, we can let go of the primitive ways.
No one is telling you not to do that. You don’t want to eat meat, by all means don’t eat meat. Me, I don’t agree with what you’re saying here. It is incredibly difficult for a human to get the nutrition they need on a completely vegetarian diet without taking supplements. Additionally, the fertilizer that is used on commercial vegetable farms is partially made of animal by-products (not feces). So, even those vegetables are grown with products made of our primitive ways. Finally, I have known many vegetarians and I have not known a single one that did not have to take something for digestive problems or gas.

On top of all that, I’ve got one vegetarian claiming that man should let go of his primitive ways and stop eating meat. I have another vegetarian claiming that man was never designed to eat meat. Why don’t you two argue out which it is and once you have a consensus I’ll rejoin the discussion.
 
Why should I do your work for you??? If it interests you, look it up.
Ummm, it’s your work to support your claims. Thanks for being lazy though, I didn’t really want to read it anyway.
 
Now you’re using the logical fallacy of called a straw man argument.
No, it’s an analogy.I wasn’t making the claim that this alien invasion was going to happen. Even if it was impossible, it would still serve as an analogy.
I said that these other species do not possess emotions, feelings, or comprehension on anywhere near the level that we do.
So now it’s a matter of degree? I can show you animals that have more emotion and intelligence than some humans.
These animals do not have the intellect and reasoning that humans have.
Which animals, and how do you know that?
I am claiming that the arguments are based on the personification of animals that do not possess the human attributes being attributed to them. A cow will **** in water and then turn around and drink that water if no one stops it. This is not out of necessity. This is a cow in a giant pasture that walks over, craps in its water source, and then drinks the water.
And on this basis we have the ethical right to control and harvest these “dumb” animals?
I can show you places where the humans drink in the same water they **** in.
This animal does not have human emotions, cognition, or thought processes. So stop trying to convince me it does.
Well that’s a pretty broad generalization don’t ya think? Why would animals have human emotions? That sounds odd. Anyways, “nonhuman primates have some facial expressions that clearly resemble those of humans and use them in similar situations.” Kalat, W.(2007) Emotion Belmont, CA:Thomson Wadsworth.
If you want to make an argument for animal cruelty, then do so without personification and I will listen.
Wasn’t me.
But this argument of animals deserving the same rights as humans is simply ridiculous because they are not humans.
What kind of rights? If you mean legal rights, then look at Spain where they have afforded such rights to apes. But when I wrote about the right to control and harvest them, I mean the ethical right.
If you are going to make that argument then I think the other poster who is making a case for plant rights has a point. If animals can be given human rights than why can’t plants be given animal rights?
Because they are not sentient.
liked burning your straw man, what’s the next logical fallacy you’d like to throw at me.
Why so testy?
And just so you’re away using the Latin name for the fallacy doesn’t make you look smart or worldly, it makes you look arrogant and pedantic.
C’mon, it’s a common term. I guess that means you can’t use *omnivore *anymore then.
 
That’s what I thought. So, I’ve got someone in this thread claiming that primates only eat fruit. I would refute that, but I’m too busy laughing until I pee myself.
Actually there are primates and primate like animals that are frugivores, but even frugivores would not pass up a tasty grub if they saw one on the bark of a tree.
 
It is incredibly difficult for a human to get the nutrition they need on a completely vegetarian diet without taking supplements.
This is completely untrue. You can check with the American Dietetic Association. I am absolutely sure that they will not back your statement.
 
Heart disease is not simply linked to meat cosumption. There are amino acids found only in meats beneficial to the heart. Don’t lecture me on this, I have a tiny bit of experience in this. Do you know what I did when my dog became really sick with heart problems? I took her off her heart medication that the doctor prescribed and put her on an amino acid called taurine. That taurine kept her heart strong and I didn’t have to keep her on her heart medication anymore. At least until nothing could help her ailing heart anymore. Cats go blind and have serious heart problems without taurine. How do I know this? Glad you asked!!! I knew of a vegetarian that my vet once told me about. Her cats started coming in with premature blindness, eye problems, heart problems and other minor problems. He didn’t find out the woman was vegetarian until much later, but when he found out, he also found out her cats were on vegetarian diets too. She refused to feed them meat, presumably because it was “cruel”, even though she knew it would cause health problems in her cats. She even refused to give them meat even after the vet told her she had to or the problems would escalate. Talk about using your heart? Was this vegetarian using her “heart”? More and more animals are finding taurine to be beneficial to their diets, especially those with heart problems.
I work with carnivorous animals. Cats are what are called obligate carnivores. They digest food in a completely different way than humans, and have completely different nutritional needs. You can not compare human health or disease to the diets and diseases of unrelated species of animals. Meateaters have short digestive tracts and digest their food quickly. Humans have much longer digestive tracts for digesting fibrous plant materials. The taurine issue with cats is absolutely true–because they are obligate carnivores. You can not compare the nutritional needs of cats to humans. The woman in your example was imposing ***her ***diet on her cat. She lacked the information and understanding of the proper diet for a cat. Likewise, human beings do not need to eat meat, and generally will experience better health when they do not include animal products in their diet, and stick to a more natural diet for our species. All animals do better when fed a diet that is natural to their species. Humans may supplementally use animal products in their diets for short and limited periods–in times of food shortage or illness–but long term over-consumption is linked to many diseases including cancer, heart disease, diabetes, obesity, osteoporosis, etc. (Yes, it is documented that the countries that consume the highest amounts of dairy products have the highest rates of osteoporosis.) I don’t think that anyone here has suggested that a vegetarian diet be fed to cats.
 
Actually there are primates and primate like animals that are frugivores, but even frugivores would not pass up a tasty grub if they saw one on the bark of a tree.
And I would not begrudge you from picking off a few of those tasty grubs from the bark of your back yard tree and treating yourself!!! Go for it!!! And please critique and share your dining experience with us. Yes, seems a more natural choice than eating a cow.
 
I think you missed the point of my post entirely. It was not about cats. Cats were mentioned in a fraction of it along with dogs, carnivores, insectivore, and omnivores. It was an illustration that some components of meat are beneficial as well as harmful, just like plants. And yes, I too worked with Cougars myself and I was very close to a Fennec Fox as well as two other Fennecs, who btw ate mostly veggies much to my surprise, as too much meat in their diet causes problems! They eat more plant based foods than meat based. It was very interesting for me to learn. They are beautiful animals and I would love to work with them more if I could.

But at least you clarified your position and explained more correctly about meat. Although I don’t know how you found out that humans are stricly vegetarians. They were not in Biblical times and they are exactly the same today. But I’m sure that some were vegetarian back then too.

I’m curious see how it was back in the OT, you know, when people were obligated to sacrifice the first born male sheep (or whatever) that was unblemished to God and then eat it with their families. Remember, certain meat was only permitted to be consumed by the priests, but other sacrifices were to be eaten by the general population and to share it among their families. I wonder if there were vegetarians back then - and I don’t see why there wouldn’t have been - what God’s reaction to them was if they didn’t want to eat the sacrificed meat? Does anyone want to speculate? Does anyone have any documentation that might suggest this would or wouldn’t have been a rather uncommon but nonetheless real scenario back then? I’m acutally interested in this, now that I’ve been thinking about it. I kind of think now that it was a kind of punishment that was included in the exile that we were to eat meat as well as toil for our food.

Would anyone be interested in this research and if so, where does one start?

(I suppose ignoring this post would be a good indication that no one is interested, tho! :rolleyes: ).
 
And I would not begrudge you from picking off a few of those tasty grubs from the bark of your back yard tree and treating yourself!!! Go for it!!! And please critique and share your dining experience with us. Yes, seems a more natural choice than eating a cow.
I’m sure if tiny bite sized cows crawled up tree bark, that would be their natural choice too…

But as far as eating grubs, YUCK!!! I have this thing with bugs in general. I try to learn more so as not to be squeamish around them but the more I learn the less I want to be around them. It’s a personal thing. I know entomoligists would probably find my view foolish, but I’m not an entomologist thankfully. 😉

That reminds me of a time when I was a teenager. My family visited relatives in Hawai’i and my uncle happened to have been a local that was used to eating native things. He told my dad of a food called opihi (sp?) and my dad just had to go and try it. What opihi is, is a type of limpet that grows on rocks in the intertidal area of the beach. They are exposed during low tide and can be “picked” off the rocks by catching them off guard and using a stick to pry them off the rocks. My dad actually did that, and rinsed the snails off in seawater and ate them raw. To me that’s disgusting and I could never do it, but to my dad and the locals on the islands, it was the most natural thing to do. It’s preference and although I think it’s not right to eat a living animal, I don’t go around trying to convince others otherwise. If it were a sin, sure, I’d be on the bandwagon as I am with abortion, but it’s not, so I don’t feel it right to force my view of eating preferenc on others. Even to the point of defending dogs in Asian countries or elsewhere. I wouldn’t do it myself, but I’m not going to pick a fight with another culture over it. Of course, endangered species it a different story and I might just pick a fight over the consumption of an endangered species if the right circumstance presented itself…

Snert
 
Sure, hang it beside the ad hominem statement of the day. Oops, can’t use Latin terms, it’s pedantic. Seriously, why so testy?
Because for this entire thread not one single person has actually addressed a single argument I’ve made.

The point of every single post is ignored and people do ridiculous things like talking about aliens taking over the world.

People want to make purely emotional appeals and then tell me to watch with my “heart” instead of my intellect. But then at the same time are personifying the animal’s intellect.

I get accused of making ad hominem attacks in a thread whose entire premise is that if I eat meat then I am morally worse than someone who doesn’t.

Either support your points with logic and refute the points I’m making the same way to just STFU, go hug a tree, and leave me in peace.

I mean seriously, you want to act all morally superior because you don’t eat meat, fine act all morally superior because you don’t eat meat. It doesn’t matter to me one little bit - I simply do not care what you eat. But remember that the Bible tells us we will be judged by the standards we have judged.
 
*QUOTE=Snerticus;5401380]And yes, I too worked with Cougars myself and I was very close to a Fennec Fox as well as two other Fennecs, who btw ate mostly veggies much to my surprise, as too much meat in their diet causes problems! They eat more plant based foods than meat based. It was very interesting for me to learn. They are beautiful animals and I would love to work with them more if I could.

But at least you clarified your position and explained more correctly about meat. Although I don’t know how you found out that humans are stricly vegetarians. They were not in Biblical times and they are exactly the same today. But I’m sure that some were vegetarian back then too.

I’m curious see how it was back in the OT, you know, when people were obligated to sacrifice the first born male sheep (or whatever) that was unblemished to God and then eat it with their families. Remember, certain meat was only permitted to be consumed by the priests, but other sacrifices were to be eaten by the general population and to share it among their families. I wonder if there were vegetarians back then - and I don’t see why there wouldn’t have been - what God’s reaction to them was if they didn’t want to eat the sacrificed meat? Does anyone want to speculate? Does anyone have any documentation that might suggest this would or wouldn’t have been a rather uncommon but nonetheless real scenario back then? I’m acutally interested in this, now that I’ve been thinking about it. I kind of think now that it was a kind of punishment that was included in the exile that we were to eat meat as well as toil for our food.

Would anyone be interested in this research and if so, where does one start?

(I suppose ignoring this post would be a good indication that no one is interested, tho! :rolleyes: ).*

So you worked with cougars and foxes. That’s cool. You have to respect how each animal was designed–and they were designed very specifically. The predators keep the prey populations in check. Everything works perfectly and you have to admire God’s design.You have to respect an animal’s natural diet–but that doesn’t mean you have to cheer when you see a predator snatch a prey animal (it’s OK to wince–and to even hope that the prey animal gets away). Predators typically go after the weakest, often sick prey animal–not the strongest and fastest–and culls that animal from the healthy ones. In the next life (according to the Bible), the lions will lie down with the lambs–this is God’s vision. In the Bible we were created in Genesis as vegetarians (vegans actually). Then the sin, the banishment from the Garden…

In the Bible we were given dominion over the animals. Some people interpret this as meaning we can do whatever we wish to animals, with disregard to them and their own lives completely. Others interpret dominion as meaning a very heavy responsibility for us to care for the Earth and all the creatures created by God–so that at the end of the world we may hand these gifts back to the Creator undamaged, untarnished, and well taken care of.

We have used these animals through the ages to advance ourselves, our lives here on earth–but now has come a time of change. Our civilization no longer needs these animals to eat, or wear their fur–we have much better alternatives. I agree with the author of Dominion, Michael Scully, that God calls us now to respond to the situation before us with mercy, releasing the animals that we no longer need to live out the lives that God gave them and designed them for. We were created in the image of God–a merciful God, a loving God–it is below us to continue to use/abuse animals simply to satisfy earthly tastes and desires when we have plentiful other food available to us. It was different, in previous times, when we ourselves struggled to survive. Those of us who live in affluent countries, who are not in want of food, are called to to help solve the world food crisis, are called to make changes that will bring the entire world, all the people and animals back to the harmony of God’s original intentions.

I believe that civilization has been through quite a journey–and am mystified with people who do not see how we are evolving spiritually, in addition to technically. We are not a stagnant, unchanging people–we want to move closer to God, to a more perfect world, we should want to show God how we can grant mercy to the lesser of Earth’s creatures, just as we hope for mercy for ourselves…

Snerticus, you asked about vegetarians in the Bible: There is a book called Vegetarian Saints that lists 150 vegetarian saints (it was written for Catholics)–I think you might like that book as a starter book. I used to have that book but recently gave it away as a gift to someone else…need to get another copy myself. The book is listed on a booklist in the Catholic Vegetarians and Vegans group. You might be able to get a copy from your library.

Does that help? Is that what you are looking for? There are many of us here at CAF who have become vegan and/or vegetarian and we have many resources for anyone who is considering making a change, or who is looking for reading materials, as well as offering personal support.

Again, I work with carnivorous animals, and would never think to try to give them a diet that they are not designed for. I am not sentimental and unrealistic when it comes to animals, but do love them as creations and creatures of God, and feel that we owe them mercy–that God actually calls us to this now, at this moment, in the history of civilization. We have never been here before…

I asked people to view the video, to search their hearts, not to be foolish or sentimental, but to see what reaction is there in their hearts. When your heart speaks to you, listen–and of course also use your head to help you to decide what to do with the feelings that your heart brings to you.
 
Snerticus: I just checked: the name of the book is:** “Vegetarian Christian Saints: Mystics, Ascetics & Monks” by Dr. Holly Roberts.**
 
Snerticus: I want to add an addendum to your lady feeding the cat a vegetarian diet story. This lady, criticized for feeding her cat ***her ***diet–did so erroneously, not understanding the nutritional needs of a cat compared to her own. If it is said that she was thinking with her heart–yes, she was–but that does not make her heart wrong. Her heart, is ahead of its time–her heart yearns for the day that the lion will lie peacefully down with the lamb. Yes, she should have used her head to help guide the feelings of her heart–because though she wants that day to desperately be here–unfortunately it is not quite here yet. Her heart, I do believe, was not wrong–but it could not bear the reality of what is. I do believe that God guides us with our hearts–we should not make light of that–and we are called to examine deeply these things that our hearts bring to our attention. This lady, though she was wrong in what she chose to feed to her cat, is blessed with a wonderful vision shared by our own Creator. It is we humans who must leave off eating animals, before the animals leave off eating each other. When that day does come we will all feel the peace of it, the reunion to the state in which we were all created at the beginning…
 
Snerticus: I want to add an addendum to your lady feeding the cat a vegetarian diet story. This lady, criticized for feeding her cat ***her ***diet–did so erroneously, not understanding the nutritional needs of a cat compared to her own. If it is said that she was thinking with her heart–yes, she was–but that does not make her heart wrong. Her heart, is ahead of its time–her heart yearns for the day that the lion will lie peacefully down with the lamb. Yes, she should have used her head to help guide the feelings of her heart–because though she wants that day to desperately be here–unfortunately it is not quite here yet. Her heart, I do believe, was not wrong–but it could not bear the reality of what is. I do believe that God guides us with our hearts–we should not make light of that–and we are called to examine deeply these things that our hearts bring to our attention. This lady, though she was wrong in what she chose to feed to her cat, is blessed with a wonderful vision shared by our own Creator. It is we humans who must leave off eating animals, before the animals leave off eating each other. When that day does come we will all feel the peace of it, the reunion to the state in which we were all created at the beginning…
See, here is where I disagree. She may have used her heart but she misplaced her compassion. In her misplaced compassion she greedily let her own animals suffer needlessly and put them in the place of the meat animals who probably (hopefully anyway) died quickly and with little pain. Her cats on the other hand may have experienced prolonged pain and/or discomfort because of her selfishness. Perhaps she did use her heart, but she certainly didn’t apply her heart to her own animals.

I do have to say though that we will probably never stop eating animals, as long as we live in this earth. The only time we will stop is after the final judgement when we get to live on the New Earth. That’s just my opinion. I don’t know if I said this before, because I wrote a post about it but I may have deleted it before I even posted it. I feel that one of the punishments that God gave Adam and Eve was the punishment of killing animals for food. That is one of many punishments until God decides to take us all from here and give us new life in the hereafter where we will no longer need to eat animals for good.

Snert

PS - I have another video to show you which shocked the heck out of me when I saw it last year. It is of a cow eating a chick. Yes, a baby chicken. After I watched it a few times I noticed things that made me think the local population had trained it to do this. Whatever the case, the people sure are having a good ol’ time watching a cow munch on a little chick. It’s pretty sad when people do this to animals and it’s absolutely needless. The video after it shows a pelican catching and eating… a pigeon…

Cow - youtube.com/watch?v=R9vxHN8_jSE

Pelican - youtube.com/watch?v=PO5ifLzLYiU

You may already have seen these before, tho.
 
See, here is where I disagree. She may have used her heart but she misplaced her compassion. In her misplaced compassion she greedily let her own animals suffer needlessly and put them in the place of the meat animals who probably (hopefully anyway) died quickly and with little pain. Her cats on the other hand may have experienced prolonged pain and/or discomfort because of her selfishness. Perhaps she did use her heart, but she certainly didn’t apply her heart to her own animals.

Snert
Snert: Why would someone not eat meat because they care for animals or feel compassion and empathy for them, and then keep a carnivorous animal as a pet, and feed it an improper diet and cause it to suffer???
 
Abraham ate meat. Jacob ate meat. Moses ate meat. Jesus ate meat. Let the barbecue begin. 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top