Decree on justification problem/question

  • Thread starter Thread starter fineca
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It may be that Paul’s emphasis on faith in Romans is in contradistinction with works of the law. One of his themes throughout the book of Romans is to explain how not only Jews, but also gentiles have access to God… and his answer is that “one is justified by faith apart from works of the law. Or is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, since God is One—Who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith” (Rom. 3:28-30). And so justification is through faith and not through adherence to the Law of Moses. Later Paul writes, “if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved” (Rom 10:9-10). He concludes this thought with, “For “everyone who calls on the Name of the Lord will be saved” (Rom. 10:13). Going back to Paul’s conversion, we can ask the question: When do Christians first “call on the Name of the LORD?” And Scripture answers, “Rise and be baptized and wash away your sins, calling on His Name” (Acts 22:16).

Paul is also concerned with, not only explaining how it is that both Jews and Gentiles have access to God through faith in Jesus Christ, but also with teaching about the nature of salvation. And the nature of salvation is that it is not based on works at all, but on grace (see footnote 1). But faith is also separated out, by Paul, from all other works. He says in Ephesians that it is “by grace [that] you have been saved through faith …] not a result of works, so that no one may boast” (2:8-9). Here we see Paul saying that salvation is by grace and through faith on the one hand, and not because of works on the other. We see Paul distinguishing faith from works, so that in the sense intended here by Paul, we believe that faith is not a work. Here Paul describes faith as a passive thing and as a vehicle through which grace is conferred and a person is saved. Elsewhere faith is described as something active and as a force, enabled by God’s grace, by which we obey Him, but that is not our concern here. For the purpose of the current inquiry, I am only concerned with proving that baptism is also not a work of man and is meant to be understood as the instrument that confers this saving grace received through faith.

Footnote 1: From the Catechism, paragraph 2011:
“The saints have always had a lively awareness that their merits were pure grace.
‘After earth’s exile, I hope to go and enjoy you in the fatherland, but I do not want to lay up merits for heaven. I want to work for your love alone. . . . In the evening of this life, I shall appear before you with empty hands, for I do not ask you, Lord, to count my works. All our justice is blemished in your eyes. I wish, then, to be clothed in your own justice and to receive from your love the eternal possession of yourself.’ ”

(continued…)
 
The first place I go to show this is the gospel of Matthew where Jesus instructs the disciples to “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you” (Matt. 28:19-20). It is amazing to me that Jesus mentions baptism as being in a category all by itself, and then goes on to exhort observance of all that He had commanded them. In other words, be baptized – which is something unique and is not understood to be in the category of observing all that Jesus commands of us – and then observe all that Jesus commands. Or another way of putting it, “baptism is not something that I command you to do in the way that I command you to do everything else, because it is not something that you can do.” In Mark’s gospel, Jesus says, “Go into all the world and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation. Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved…” (Mark 16:15-16). No mention of works and observing commands, and yet we still have baptism. Paul tells us that God “saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to His own mercy” (Titus 3:5). And how is that mercy received? “By the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit” (Titus 3:5). So how is baptism to be understood as not a work of man? Peter teaches us that “Baptism …] now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (1 Pet. 3:21). How does baptism save us? Through the resurrection of Jesus Christ! Not by invoking the Name of God, but by the God Who is invoked. Not by the water that is applied by man, but “by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit” (Titus 3:5), “in which [baptism] you were also raised with Him through faith” (Col 2:12). This is the work of God alone! It “is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast” (Eph. 2:9).

Augustine explains this beautifully in his sermons on the gospel of John when he shows us how we should understand what is written, when it is said that “Jesus was making and baptizing more disciples than John (although Jesus Himself did not baptize, but only His disciples)” (John 4:1-2). Augustine says that this is placed in the text so that we would understand that no matter who the person is who baptizes, or rather, who the person is who uses human hands to apply the water and invoke the Name of God, it is always Jesus Who is performing the baptism. This is why the Catholic Church recognizes the baptisms administered by heretics and pagans. Jesus is “He who baptizes with the Holy Spirit” (John 1:33). Jesus baptizes. Nobody else. This is the clearest testimony to God’s grace and God’s initiative independent of any human will or exertion!!! It is God Who has mercy and Who baptizes. A person may have faith and it can be said of that person that the faith is his own (although it is a gift). But he cannot have baptism. Baptism is not his own. He can only be passively operated on by baptism. He can only be baptized. He can have no share in the work or possession of baptism. Augustine points out that Paul can even refer to the gospel that he preaches as “my” gospel (cf. Rom 16:25). But no one lays claim on Christ’s baptism of “water and the Spirit” (John 3:5). For salvation is for those who are born, “not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God” (John 1:13)… “being circumcised with a circumcision made without hands …] by the circumcision of Christ, having been buried with Him in baptism, in which you were also raised with Him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised Him from the dead” (Col. 2:11-12).

May the LORD be with you all!
 
Great thread, everyone. It’s great to hear this topic discussed in a friendly, open-minded manner.

I think EVERYONE --both Catholics and Protestants – should read this document on Justification from the Council of Trent. If not, they can’t discuss the topic from any informed opinion at all.

history.hanover.edu/texts/trent/ct06.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top