Defending Hell...

  • Thread starter Thread starter RCCDefender
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

RCCDefender

Guest
Would you think someone would want to do such a thing??? On another forum I post on the poor kid is an atheist who can’t grasp that Hell is eternal. Phil, maybe you can jump over there and see… He can’t believe God would be so unforgiving and unmerciful that He’d let people burn in Hell for all eternity. He insists it’s not because he has any qualms about going there because he says he has no worry that he might be wrong. Only that the concept of Hell’s eternity seems to conflict with the merciful God he hears Christians talk about. How do you defend Hell to an atheist?? :rolleyes:
 
Hello RCCdefender,

I think this is a perfect example of Church leaders leading people astray by not preaching Jesus’ warnings of eternal damnation. Sure, if you dig hard enough and deep enough you will find a Church document with the notion that Jesus will damn souls who fail to care for the poor. However, this is not what is coming across from the pulpit in general.

I have heard a number of abortionists, atheists and fornicators who want to teach me about Jesus mercy and forgiveness. What! They are not even Christian. Where do they get their information? It is what they are not hearing from the pulpit of the Church that causes them to suppress their consciences which are yelling out for them to repent.

Please visit WARNING! Jesus Does Not Forgive All to see the side of Jesus that modern Christianity has suppressed.

NAB MAT 25:41

Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you accursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink, a stranger and you gave me no welcome, naked and you gave me no clothing, ill and in prison, and you did not care for me.’ Then they will answer and say, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or ill or in prison, and not minister to your needs?’ He will answer them, ‘Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me.’ And these will go off to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."

**NAB2 LUK 13:23 **

Someone asked him, “Lord, will only a few people be saved?” He answered them, "Strive to enter through the narrow gate, for many, I tell you, will attempt to enter but will not be strong enough. After the master of the house has arisen and locked the door, then will you stand outside knocking and saying, ‘Lord, open the door for us.’ He will say to you in reply, ‘I do not know where you are from.’ And you will say, ‘We ate and drank in your company and you taught in our streets.’ Then he will say to you, 'I do not know where (you) are from. Depart from me, all you evildoers!’ And there will be wailing and grinding of teeth when you see Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God and you yourselves cast out.
 
You cannot defend hell to any moral human being, let alone an atheist.

Punishment for eternity- not matter what the “crime”- is immoral.

That’s really all there is to it. Sugar coat it, apologize it away, etc. The bottom line? Punishment is intended to elicit a change in behavior. If said punishment becomes eternal, a change in behavior is now irrelevant. Ergo, “eternal punishmet” is now a euphemism for “eternal torture”.

And if you didn’t know it, eternal torture is immoral.

Ty
 
40.png
TySixtus:
You cannot defend hell to any moral human being, let alone an atheist.

Punishment for eternity- not matter what the “crime”- is immoral.

That’s really all there is to it. Sugar coat it, apologize it away, etc. The bottom line? Punishment is intended to elicit a change in behavior. If said punishment becomes eternal, a change in behavior is now irrelevant. Ergo, “eternal punishmet” is now a euphemism for “eternal torture”.

And if you didn’t know it, eternal torture is immoral.
Ty
Hello Ty,

Are you saying that Jesus is imoral when he preaches eternal damnation?

WARNING! Jesus Does Not Forgive All

NAB JOH 5:27

“The Father has given over to him power to pass judgment because he is Son of Man; no need for you to be surprised at this, for an hour is coming in which all those in their tombs shall hear his voice and come forth. Those who have done right shall rise to live; the evildoers shall rise to be damned.

NAB MAT 7:13

How narrow the gate and constricted the road that leads to life. And those who find it are few.
"Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but underneath are ravenous wolves. By their fruits you will know them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Just so, every good tree bears good fruit, and a rotten tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a rotten tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire. So by their fruits you will know them. "Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven.

**NAB MAT 13:47-50 **

The reign of God is also like a dragnet thrown into the lake, which collected all sorts of things. When it was full they hauled it ashore and sat down to put what was worthwhile into containers. What was useless they threw away. That is how it will be at the end of the world. Angels will go out and separate the wicked from the just and hurl the wicked into the fiery furnace, where they will wail and grind their teeth.

LUK 16:19 The Rich Man and Lazarus


There was a rich man who dressed in purple garments and fine linen and dined sumptuously each day. And lying at his door was a poor man named Lazarus, covered with sores, who would gladly have eaten his fill of the scraps that fell from the rich man’s table. Dogs even used to come and lick his sores. When the poor man died, he was carried away by angels to the bosom of Abraham. The rich man also died and was buried, and from the netherworld, where he was in torment, he raised his eyes and saw Abraham far off and Lazarus at his side. And he cried out, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me. Send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am suffering torment in these flames.’ Abraham replied, ‘My child, remember that you received what was good during your lifetime while Lazarus likewise received what was bad; but now he is comforted here, whereas you are tormented. Moreover, between us and you a great chasm is established to prevent anyone from crossing who might wish to go from our side to yours or from your side to ours.’ He said, 'Then I beg you, father, send him to my father’s house, for I have five brothers, so that he may warn them, lest they too come to this place of torment.’ But Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the prophets. Let them listen to them.’ He said, ‘Oh no, father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’ Then Abraham said, ‘If they will not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone should rise from the dead.’”
 
Steven Merten:
Hello Ty,

Are you saying that Jesus is imoral when he preaches eternal damnation?
That is exactly what I’m saying. I can understand that- around here- this is a minority view point.

Furthermore, if the Catholic god exists, and does send people to hell for eternity, I would have to conclude that it is immoral as well.

Having said that, who wants to be told only what they want to hear? I look forward to some interesting discussions.

Ty
 
40.png
TySixtus:
Having said that, who wants to be told only what they want to hear? I look forward to some interesting discussions.
People who go to hell do so because they refuse to forgive, and God will not force our will - nor will he allow such a person into the glory of heaven. What is left? To be outside of heaven.

On another note, for you to be consistent, you must love all evildoers to the point of helping them, since you do not wish for them to change in order to still receive eternal glory. Thus, it is you who actually are immoral for supporting and rewarding evil.

hurst
 
Peace be with you!

Ty,

God does not put us in hell Himself. We do so by being unrepentant of our sins and refusing to accept His forgiveness. I agree, placing someone in eternal torment is not compassionate, but neither is what that person did to end up there. God’s compassion and forgiveness is always there…always…so we’ve got a long time (if we have a long live) to accept it. If, after all those years, we don’t repent of our sins and accept His forgiveness, then we will have chosen Hell ourselves…God will not have chosen it for us.

I hope this makes it a little clearer.

In Christ,
Rand
 
I’m not convinced we shoudl regard hell as a punishment, which would in turn render the argument about an enternal punishment for a finite crime irrelevent:

What is hell exactly? It is the place where Lucifer is, right? And we know Lucifer is out of the presense of God. Why? Because given the vision of Mary in Revelations, he decided he would not honor a mere woman (since angels are a higher being in his mind). So he chose to leave rather than humble himself before the Queen of Heaven.

Okay, so now we have this place outside of God’s presense.

Now let’s consider what evil is: Evil is simply the absense of Good. God is Good, so the absense of God would be evil or bad. If Hell is a bad place to be, it is so because of the absense of God.

Okay, now considering who else might end up in that place. It will be people who choose to live outside of God’s presense. God doesn’t send them to punishment, although it is certainly described as such in humn terms. Rather He allows the person to choose what the person wants.

An atheist wants to live without God. Hell is simply that state of existence…it is God allowing the atheist to have his wish (to live without God). Sure someday the person in Hell will realize the error of that choice, but it isn’t so much a punishment as it is allowing the person to have their way.

Christians fear Hell because we comprehend the misery of life without God. It is God fearing people who can describe the torment of Hell, the burning (of desrire?) that occurs there, etc.

The atheist does not comprehend the misery of life without God, in fact he prefers it in this life. He chooses that life. Why should God, contrary to His nature, at the instant of that person’s death override the free will of that person and force him to live where he does not want to live?
 
if someone doesn’t believe in God, then by the same
token, they can’t believe in hell…

if they believe in hell, they will believe in God…

belief that God wouldn’t condemn, is different…

the torment of
Hell, is the ‘absence of God’… whatever form that takes…
no light, no love, no goodness… if we reject God, then
why should we not expect him to ‘leave us’?

some people experience that torment here now…
the difference is here, they can turn to God, can
look to him for comfort… later, they won’t be able to…

or, that’s kinda my feelings in a simplistic nutshell…

🙂
 
You have enough warning before Hell, Ty.

It is not immoral to punish someone when they have had plenty of warning. God promises to punish us forever if we do not behave. In fact, if God would not keep the promise of punishment, that would be immoral.

Government warns you about not killing. You do it anyway and you are sentenced to life in prison w/o parole. Is this immoral? Nope. Why? Because you had warning.

dxu
 
Chris W:
If Hell is a bad place to be, it is so because of the absense of God.
Another thought: An atheist might think “well, the life I live now isn’t so bad, and I live without God now, so perhaps this Hell you describe isn’t such an aweful place after all”.

I want to caution against that line ot thinking. Hell will be a place where only the God-less people will be, and God will not be. An atheist might enjoy life here, while denying God, but he is only able to do so because the world is not composed entirely of God-less people, and God Himself is with us here.

Existence will be entirely different. Atheists will live only with atheists and God will not be there to provide an beautiful world full of loving people, in which to enjoy a God-less life.

Make sense? It isn’t just the absense of the spiritual benefits of God, it is the abense of all this is Good because God is the Author of all that is good.

For now an atheist may say “I enjoy my life…I don’t need God…I have family and friends, my health, appreciate beauty, music, good food and wine, etc. etc.”

Consider all that is Good. Then imagine nothing good existing. That’s hell. For now an atheist reaps the benefits of God’s goodness in the world, so the atheist may be oblivious to what it actually means to deny that Goodness (God) exists.
 
40.png
TySixtus:
You cannot defend hell to any moral human being, let alone an atheist.

Punishment for eternity- not matter what the “crime”- is immoral.

That’s really all there is to it. Sugar coat it, apologize it away, etc. The bottom line? Punishment is intended to elicit a change in behavior. If said punishment becomes eternal, a change in behavior is now irrelevant. Ergo, “eternal punishmet” is now a euphemism for “eternal torture”.

And if you didn’t know it, eternal torture is immoral.

Ty
It is not a punishment in the strict sense of the word. It is a closing of the gates of heaven to them. This person is not allowed into heaven because heaven is for those who have been perfected. These people refuse with their own will to be perfected. If they end up in hell, it is there own fault.

What are you talking about immoral? How is it immoral? You are an atheist. If there is no god, then nothing is immoral. The only way there can be any objective morality is if there is a god.
 
What I see here is exactly the same things that have been posted already on the other site.
We say Hell is eternal. This guy says, “why can’t God forgive someone in Hell. That means God is unforgiving and unmerciful. A merciful God would give the person a second chance, even if it was a person in Hell.”
He says our concept of Hell disproves our concept of a loving God.
 
40.png
RCCDefender:
What I see here is exactly the same things that have been posted already on the other site.
We say Hell is eternal. This guy says, “why can’t God forgive someone in Hell. That means God is unforgiving and unmerciful. A merciful God would give the person a second chance, even if it was a person in Hell.”
He says our concept of Hell disproves our concept of a loving God.
Consider perhaps a more comprehensible analogy (hopefully): A man must choose between living outside the walls of a King’s palace where there is nothing good whatsoever. Or, he can choose to enter the King’s palace where there is no evil whatsoever. Then the person see a vision of both places and is told he must choose. What do you think a person would choose? Obviously he would choose to live inside the palace walls.

But, given that choice, having seen the conditions on either side of the walls, is the person really capable of loving the King? The choice to love the King is outside of the person’s free will, for he is quite unable to choose not to love the King faced with that decision.

Perhaps I’m rambling, but I’m trying to illustrate why the choice cannot be made after death (the “second chance” they so often assert should exist): Once a person is in Hell, he will be unable to freely choose to love God. His free will no longer exists, per se, because of the extenuating circumstances. There can be no free choice. And without free will true love cannot exist.

It is therefore quite impossible for that choice to occur in hell.

Perhaps someone can come up with a better analogy for this priciple, but hey, I’ve only given it about 2 mintues of thought here. Perhaps a better illustration would be to consider the free will of a person currnently being tortured. While in the midst of torture, can a person really have free will to choose? I think not, because every choice will only be aimed at ended the misery.
 
Ty, welcome to the forums!

It seems to me that we may be trying to address an argument that is based on a faulty assumption.
40.png
TySixtus:
Punishment is intended to elicit a change in behavior. If said punishment becomes eternal, a change in behavior is now irrelevant.
Punishment is NOT only to elicit a change of behavior. There are actually four ends to punishment:

  1. *]Rehabilitation
    *]Defense
    *]Deterrence
    *]Retribution

    Ty, you seem to be focused on the first possible end, rehabilitation. It is true that after one dies, assuming one is in Hell, then there is no possibility of rehabilitation.

    But, there are the other 3 ends to consider. “Defense” is defense from the perpetrator, but in this case, after someone has died he or she poses no more threat to others.

    “Deterrence” means deterring others from committing the bad acts. The fact that the perpetrator goes to Hell, and is there eternally definitely CAN act as a deterrent (although it often doesn’t).

    “Retribution” is punishment that is due by justice. The question is, then, does God’s justice demand punishment? And if so, what kind?

    I bring this point up because although it is often pointed out that those in Hell have truly chosen their destiny, we must also safeguard the principle that Hell is not just “not making it into Heaven” but also *actual punishment imposed by God *due to our personal sins.

    I think the Church safeguards both truths in the Catechism
    1033 We cannot be united with God unless we freely choose to love him. But we cannot love God if we sin gravely against him, against our neighbor or against ourselves. . .To die in mortal sin without repenting and accepting God’s merciful love means remaining separated from him for ever by our own free choice. This state of definitive self-exclusion from communion with God and the blessed is called “hell.”
    but also
    1035 The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, “eternal fire.” The chief punishment of hell is eternal separation from God, in whom alone man can possess the life and happiness for which he was created and for which he longs.
    I wonder, in fact, if the punishments of hell are not LESS then we would deserve, since sin is an offense of near-infinite magnitude because the one offended is Infinite.

    I look forward to further discussion on this if appropriate.
    VC
 
Verbum Caro:
…although it is often pointed out that those in Hell have truly chosen their destiny, we must also safeguard the principle that Hell is not just “not making it into Heaven” but also *actual punishment imposed by God *due to our personal sins.
Interesting info. I realize what you posted is short excerpts but does it mean that the “punishment” is God-inflicted or could we read that as self-inflicted?

Thx,
Chris
 
Chris,

I think that what we have to do is attempt to keep both realities before us: 1) that it is ultimately WE who choose our final destination, because God gives us all sufficient grace to be saved, but we have the freedom to reject and not cooperate with this grace and 2) God is just.

The classic division of the pains of Hell into the “pain of loss” and the “pain of sense” seem to me to illustrate this reality. Were Hell only about us not wanting to be with God then the “pain of loss” (not being with God) would be the only pain appropriate when we find out what we have chosen.

But, the “pain of sense” seems appropriate because we are due punishiment for our sin.

As for whether or not these punishments are self-inflicted. Well, yes you could say that, just as all punishments due to violations of the law or offenses against justice are self-inflicted. But in another sense, I think it would be better not to focus on this, because in a certain way punisment is only punishment when it is *involuntary. *

I highly reccomend this excellent article from the Rosary Confraternity on Eternal Punishment. It is highly profitable reading in my opinion.

So what do you think?
God Bless,
VC
 
40.png
TySixtus:
if the Catholic god exists, and does send people to hell for eternity, I would have to conclude that it is immoral as well.
Some people want to go to hell and thus hell becomes an expression of God’s infinite justice. Some choose hell and God will not force them to do otherwise. They know full well that what they are doing is wrong. In a sense they condemn themselves, rejecting God. In a very real sense, God is also Judge.
It is really funny to hear an atheist talking about morality or immorality. It is really funny to imagine an atheist in front of the Supreme Judge (death is the moment) before departing into hell: What is he going to say? “Sorry God, I thought I was my own little god, you know!!! You made me like this! The fault is yours!”
 
40.png
RCCDefender:
What I see here is exactly the same things that have been posted already on the other site.
We say Hell is eternal. This guy says, “why can’t God forgive someone in Hell. That means God is unforgiving and unmerciful. A merciful God would give the person a second chance, even if it was a person in Hell.”
He says our concept of Hell disproves our concept of a loving God.
Concept of a loving God? God is a loving God and He will continue to love us in hell also,because Gods love is unconditional. :confused: God Bless
 
Verbum Caro:
So what do you think?
What do I think? I think you are educating me. :o I have never heard of that pain of sense explanation before now.

I only had time to scan it…I’ll give it a more thorough read tonight.

Curiousity question: Is the author the same Dominican priest, Father Duffner of Holy Rosary in Portland, OR? And do you know if this document has had approval of others in the Church, or is this the teaching of one priest (albeit a respectable priest with a great reputation for sound teaching, if it’s the same Fr. Duffner)?

Thank you,
Chris W
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top