D
DanielJT
Guest
I listen to the podcast of CAL so I am usually a little behind. I just recently listened to the episodes where CAL was only addressing people that wanted to redefine marriage.
As I listened I had a couple thoughts that I am now struggling with and would like some (name removed by moderator)ut on.
Thank you in advance for your thoughts on the subject.
As I listened I had a couple thoughts that I am now struggling with and would like some (name removed by moderator)ut on.
- It was mentioned that if someone was not able to participate in the sexual act (a eunuch or someone that was physically unable to) would be excluded from marriage since the sexual act as open to procreation is an essential quality of true marriage. This made me think of Mary and Joseph and the fact that they never consummated their marriage. How do we reconcile these two ideas? Were Joseph and Mary in a true marriage?
- Also, with the sexual act having an end goal of procreation and marriage being the institution in which this end goal is encompassed, wouldn’t this justify premarital sex as a way to ensure that procreation was in fact a possibility between the couple seeking marriage? Couples sometimes get married and then come to the realization that they are unable to have children (this being one of the major arguments against the true definition of marriage). With procreation as an end goal of sex, and this being an intrinsic quality to marriage, shouldn’t the couple first be sure that this goal can be accomplished? And I’ve heard of this in other cultures, where the intended couple first have sex and if, and only if, the woman gets pregnant do they get married.
Thank you in advance for your thoughts on the subject.