B
Bill_A
Guest
There was a good piece on PBA abotu Iconoclasts.
Gentlemen, gentlemen, back up here! One of the absolute prerequisites of the practice of hesychasm is an absolute absence of images. Prayer must be totally imageless. The mind must NOT be engaged with any image or icon or visualisation or what the West would term meditative prayer. For the hesychast, whether tyro or proficient, all of these things must be swept away, out of the mind and out of the soul. Now I know that this may seem odd since Orthodoxy is always connected in people’s minds with an abundance of icons and images… but that is the way of it…For hesychast spirituality, I think icons would be better as the interplay of light will help achieve the inner calm required
Yes but for us, we pray to God and we are reminded of how a saint, like Saint Benedict lived in his black robe, 1500 years ago. We are humbled by the story of how he fed his crow and God sent the crow to follow him and keep him company when he was a hermit.Gentlemen, gentlemen, back up here! One of the absolute prerequisites of the practice of hesychasm is an absolute absence of images. Prayer must be totally imageless. The mind must NOT be engaged with any image or icon or visualisation or what the West would term meditative prayer. For the hesychast, whether tyro or proficient, all of these things must be swept away, out of the mind and out of the soul. Now I know that this may seem odd since Orthodoxy is always connected in people’s minds with an abundance of icons and images… but that is the way of it…
God is the one loveable who is always rejoicing without end in infinite happiness.
~St.Gregory, Bishop of Nyssa, died 395
The hesychast rule against engagement with images during prayer does not apply to the icon. The ascetic rule deals with images created in the mind by the imagination, not to be confused with the icon, the image of the Divine reality.One of the absolute prerequisites of the practice of hesychasm is an absolute absence of images. Prayer must be totally imageless. The mind must NOT be engaged with any image or icon or visualisation or what the West would term meditative prayer. For the hesychast, whether tyro or proficient, all of these things must be swept away, out of the mind and out of the soul. Now I know that this may seem odd since Orthodoxy is always connected in people’s minds with an abundance of icons and images… but that is the way of it…
It will take a bit of work to answer these questions so before I do it I need to know if you are genuinely asking or if you are more or less simply saying that the Catholic understanding of hesychasm is more accurate than the Orthodox?The hesychast rule against engagement with images during prayer does not apply to the icon. The ascetic rule deals with images created in the mind by the imagination, not to be confused with the icon, the image of the Divine reality.
Why would the Church during the 7th Ecumenical Council dogmatized the veneration of the icon if it was an obstacle to prayer? Also, most of the great iconographers (e.g. Andrei Rublev) were hesychast monks. Why would they create an image their spiritual practice prohibited?
Ouspensky in Theology of the Icon (1992, p. 505) is quite unambiguous when he writes that although ‘a widely accepted opinion maintains that this rule (against the access of the mind of images during prayer) also applies to the icon… this is a misunderstanding indeed, because the ascetic rule deals with images created by the mind by the imagination - images which on no account could be identified with the icon, the image of reality.’There is no dichotomy with a hesychast being an iconographer. It is just that the practice of hesychastic prayer precludes the use of images, mental or external, during the times of praying the prayer of the heart.
I’m confused as to whether the Catholic understanding of hesychasm is any different from the Orthodox. For example, in a previous thread it was agreed that New Advent had wrongly condemned Hesychasm as heresy by confusing it with Quietism. This is the current postion of the Catholic Church on hesychasm from the EWTN expert in Eastern Catholicism Anthony Dragani.I need to know if you are genuinely asking or if you are more or less simply saying that the Catholic understanding of hesychasm is more accurate than the Orthodox?
Churches to restore St. Gregory Palamas to their calendars, as many had previously removed him.…the Western Church recognizes the validity and full legitimacy of Hesychast prayer. Pope John Paul II even asked Byzantine Catholic
Ouspensky was not a monk and it is doubtful that he ever used the Prayer of the Heart seriously. Many of the laity use it rather like the Catholic rosary.Ouspensky in Theology of the Icon (1992, p. 505) is quite unambiguous when he writes that although ‘a widely accepted opinion maintains that this rule (against the access of the mind of images during prayer) also applies to the icon… this is a misunderstanding indeed, because the ascetic rule deals with images created by the mind by the imagination - images which on no account could be identified with the icon, the image of reality.’
Well, we all love our polemicsThe divisions over the hesychasm, the Uncreated light etc. appears to me to be down to polemicists rather than any real difference between the two Churches.
Please inform me if I’m wrong… many thanks for your time, LEO