Q
Questioning_1
Guest
This should not be a difficult one!
Philosophically define God.
on your mark get set…GO!
Philosophically define God.
on your mark get set…GO!
Where is that quoted from?[34](javascriptpenWindow(‘cr/34.htm’) The world, and man, attest that they contain within themselves neither their first principle nor their final end, but rather that they participate in Being itself, which alone is without origin or end. Thus, in different ways, man can come to know that there exists a reality which is the first cause and final end of all things, a reality “that everyone calls God”.10
Sorry - the Cathechism - hereWhere is that quoted from?
Yeah, the link isn’t working…Where is that quoted from?
Oo-kay, makes sense.Sorry - the Cathechism - here
That’s exactly what I came up with when I fell away from the Church. But now it’s more ‘maybe God’God is.
God is what necessarily exists. As Christians we also believe that this a being, an intelligence or a consciousness and a will. All else is accident.This should not be a difficult one!
Philosophically define God.
on your mark get set…GO!
The necessary Being who has created my unnecessary being, and has inexplicably given me the ability to contemplate this reality.Philosophically define God.
Difficult? It’s impossible. Can’t be done. Not with any means of reasoning or communicating at our disposal.This should not be a difficult one!
Ehhh… I fail at this. Sorry.This should not be a difficult one!
Philosophically define God.
on your mark get set…GO!
I think it’s more accurate to characterize this as Faust’s thoughts, which Goethe used in constructing a character whose hubris ultimately brought about his destruction, rather than Goethe’s “definition” of God.That’s exactly what I came up with when I fell away from the Church. But now it’s more ‘maybe God’
I also appreciate Goethe’s definition as Faust attempts to translate John’s gospel:
In the beginning was the Word.
Already I am stopped. It seems absurd.
The Word does not deserve the highest prize,
I must translate it otherwise.
If I am well inspired and not blind.
It says: In the beginning was the Mind.
Ponder that first line, wait and see,
Lest you should write too hastily.
Is mind the all creating source?
It ought to say: In the beginning there was Force.
Yet something warns me as I grasp the pen,
That my translation must be changed again.
The spirit helps me. Now it is exact.
I write: In the beginning was the Act.
.
Are you being disingenuous or just ignorant?
I am neither. Just Questioning how others define God. I have received much help here on this forum.
Are you rude or just a jerk?
Pax
Allow me to rephrase the ‘insulting personal question’ edited out of my previous post:Difficult? It’s impossible. Can’t be done. Not with any means of reasoning or communicating at our disposal.
[Edited by Moderator]
We cannot know *what *God is, only *that *He Is.
Catholic dogma sets some boundaries on our definition, but they are wide, and within them there is no wrong answer.
Pax
God:This should not be a difficult one!
Philosophically define God.
on your mark get set…GO!
Thank you for rephrasing,Questioning? >> Do you honestly think that defining God is not difficult philosophically or do you know that it is difficult/impossible and are subtly trying to prove a point by asking?