Definition of "Church" in early years

  • Thread starter Thread starter aball1035
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

aball1035

Guest
I’m wondering how the Church Fathers and them defined their “church”. Just a number of believers in CHrist or was common belief in doctrine and proctices necessary too.

And any quotes or background info would be very much appreciated.
 
I’m wondering how the Church Fathers and them defined their “church”. Just a number of believers in CHrist or was common belief in doctrine and proctices necessary too.

And any quotes or background info would be very much appreciated.
At the very beginning there were a number of loosely affiliated Churches, the major centers being Alexandria, Jerusalem, Antioch, Constantiniople and Rome. Each of these Churches was under the control of a Bishop. The Bishop of Rome was held to be the First Bishop and was looked to when matters of theological concern came about. The first instance that we know about was around the year 56 ce or so, when the Roman Church actively exerted influence with the Church at Corinth and the troubles that it was having.

At the First Council of Nicea in 325 ce, Rome and Alexandria were recognized as being the major centers of the faith, with Rome occuping the primary position. This was due to the martyrdom of both Sts Peter and Paul in Rome and the sanctification of Rome by their blood as well as the blood of thousands of others martyred for the faith in that city. Rome was viewed as being particularly holy.

The Patriarchs of Constantinople and other eastern Churches didn’t like the arrangement as they saw the Bishop of Rome as being the First Bishop, but merely the first among equals. That led to the splintering of the Church and the formation of the Orthodox Churches who still have pretty much the same mode of operation. A loose federation of affiliated Churches united by liturgy and faith

Over time a number of the Orthodox Churches returned to full communion with Rome. Others never did. We certainly hope that they will.

For more detailed references, I would reccommend reading Eusebeus, Tertullian. Ignatius of Antioch, Irenaeus, Pope Clement I, Justin Martyr and Augustine of Hippo.

This is a very short and concise history. There were a lot of other factors involved in the early Church. This brief explanation is in no way intended to be complete in all details.
 
I’m wondering how the Church Fathers and them defined their “church”. Just a number of believers in CHrist or was common belief in doctrine and proctices necessary too.
Even before the Church Fathers, note the characteristics of the infant Church:

Acts 2:42-46
[42] And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. [43] And fear came upon every soul; and many wonders and signs were done through the apostles. [44] And all who believed were together and had all things in common; [45] and they sold their possessions and goods and distributed them to all, as any had need. [46] And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes

Acts 4:32
[32] Now the company of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one said that any of the things which he possessed was his own, but they had everything in common.

The Council of Jerusalem proclaimed a binding decree on all Christians (Jew and Gentile), thus showing that the one Church is to have one faith and that there is a magisterial (teaching) authority in that Church with supreme jurisdiction.

Paul’s letters are themselves a sign that there was one Church throughout the provinces of Asia, Rome, Africa, etc. They are a sign that Paul expected and worked for unity of belief and worship among the churches – remember, he didn’t found the church in Rome, but he wrote to it with authority nonetheless!

I appeal to you, brethren, to take note of those who create dissensions and difficulties, in opposition to the doctrine which you have been taught; avoid them. (Rom. 16:17)

I appeal to you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree and that there be no dissensions among you, but that you be united in the same mind and the same judgment. (1 Cor 1:10)

… so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the cunning of men, by their craftiness in deceitful wiles. (Eph. 4:14)

Only let your manner of life be worthy of the gospel of Christ, so that whether I come and see you or am absent, I may hear of you that you stand firm in one spirit, with one mind striving side by side for the faith of the gospel… (Phil. 1:27)

… complete my joy by being of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord and of one mind. (Phil. 2:2)

As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus that you may charge certain persons not to teach any different doctrine… (1 Tim. 1:3)

If you put these instructions before the brethren, you will be a good minister of Christ Jesus, nourished on the words of the faith and of the good doctrine which you have followed. (1 Tim. 4:6)

… he must hold firm to the sure word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to confute those who contradict it. (Titus 1:9)

Therefore let us leave the elementary doctrine of Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, with instruction about ablutions, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. (Heb. 6:1-2)

Any one who goes ahead and does not abide in the doctrine of Christ does not have God; he who abides in the doctrine has both the Father and the Son. If any one comes to you and does not bring this doctrine, do not receive him into the house or give him any greeting… (2 John 1:9-10)

Yes, the Church, from her beginning, has had one faith.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top