J
josephback
Guest
Does the Eastern Catholic Church share the Orthodox concept of deification, or do they use the Western theology of mortification? Just wondering…
I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that the ECC shares with Orthodoxy the concept of deification/theosis. It is, after all, as far as I’m aware, an eastern Christian concept.Does the Eastern Catholic Church share the Orthodox concept of deification, or do they use the Western theology of mortification? Just wondering…
Of course, it must be emphasized that we will never truly BECOME God in the literal sense…we are and always will remain his creatures, while the three persons of the Blessed Trinity are the Creator. Our future glory, and the glory which Our Blessed Lady and the saints now enjoy, is totally DEPENDENT upon the glory of Christ…we will always remain finite beings and are given only a share of the divine life so as to enter into profound communion with God. In the East, it is emphasized that the process of deification is ongoing and eternal, with the saints in heaven ever approaching, but never reaching (as finite beings) the Divinity.The Word became flesh to make us “partakers of the divine nature”:78 "For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God."79 "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God."80 "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."81
78 2 Pt 1:4.
79 St. Irenaeus, Adv. haeres. 3, 19, 1: PG 7/1, 939.
80 St. Athanasius, De inc. 54, 3: PG 25, 192B.
81 St. Thomas Aquinas, Opusc. 57, 1-4.
I thank you for correcting and educating me about deification also being part of “western” theology!Deification is also very much a Western concept (though with a different emphasis)…so I’m not sure what the OP means by “deification vs mortification”. The idea that we are to share in the divine nature of Christ is very prominent in the Roman liturgy…as the priest says at every OF mass “May we come to share in the divinity of Christ who humbled himself to share in our humanity.” In both the West and East, Christ humbled himself in order to raise mankind to eternal glory, sharing in the divine life of the Trinity. In the West we are often reminded in the liturgy of the hours that humanity, in the person of Christ, already sits in eternal divine glory at the right hand of the Father, who, in dying, destroyed our death, and in rising, restored our life (again, as we say at mass). It has always bugged me that many see deification as a distinctly Eastern concept. I was at one mass where a Latin priest was so bold as to say in his homily “you are gods” and then went on to explain the teaching of deification without any reference to the East or Eastern theology…it is very much present in St. Thomas Aquinas without a doubt. (It was, appropriately, a Dominican priest who declared to the congregation “you are gods”)
CCC 460:
Of course, it must be emphasized that we will never truly BECOME God in the literal sense…we are and always will remain his creatures, while the three persons of the Blessed Trinity are the Creator. Our future glory, and the glory which Our Blessed Lady and the saints now enjoy, is totally DEPENDENT upon the glory of Christ…we will always remain finite beings and are given only a share of the divine life so as to enter into profound communion with God. In the East, it is emphasized that the process of deification is ongoing and eternal, with the saints in heaven ever approaching, but never reaching (as finite beings) the Divinity.
THANK YOU!!Deification is also very much a Western concept (though with a different emphasis)…so I’m not sure what the OP means by “deification vs mortification”. The idea that we are to share in the divine nature of Christ is very prominent in the Roman liturgy…as the priest says at every OF mass “May we come to share in the divinity of Christ who humbled himself to share in our humanity.” In both the West and East, Christ humbled himself in order to raise mankind to eternal glory, sharing in the divine life of the Trinity. In the West we are often reminded in the liturgy of the hours that humanity, in the person of Christ, already sits in eternal divine glory at the right hand of the Father, who, in dying, destroyed our death, and in rising, restored our life (again, as we say at mass). It has always bugged me that many see deification as a distinctly Eastern concept. I was at one mass where a Latin priest was so bold as to say in his homily “you are gods” and then went on to explain the teaching of deification without any reference to the East or Eastern theology…it is very much present in St. Thomas Aquinas without a doubt. (It was, appropriately, a Dominican priest who declared to the congregation “you are gods”)
CCC 460:
Of course, it must be emphasized that we will never truly BECOME God in the literal sense…we are and always will remain his creatures, while the three persons of the Blessed Trinity are the Creator. Our future glory, and the glory which Our Blessed Lady and the saints now enjoy, is totally DEPENDENT upon the glory of Christ…we will always remain finite beings and are given only a share of the divine life so as to enter into profound communion with God. In the East, it is emphasized that the process of deification is ongoing and eternal, with the saints in heaven ever approaching, but never reaching (as finite beings) the Divinity.
Yes, we are created in the image and likeness of God and thus may become god but not God.Hi. I probably should have said “atonement theolgy”. Deification is Mortification is Sanctification, but we all use different words to describe it. I guess that’s what I was getting at. Does the East explain things the same way as the Orthodox? Thanks for your replies.
Totally agree with everything You have posted and share your same frustrations…Do you think Theosis gets enough attention in the western church? Or is it that different aspects of it are highlighted?Deification is also very much a Western concept (though with a different emphasis)…so I’m not sure what the OP means by “deification vs mortification”. The idea that we are to share in the divine nature of Christ is very prominent in the Roman liturgy…as the priest says at every OF mass “May we come to share in the divinity of Christ who humbled himself to share in our humanity.” In both the West and East, Christ humbled himself in order to raise mankind to eternal glory, sharing in the divine life of the Trinity. In the West we are often reminded in the liturgy of the hours that humanity, in the person of Christ, already sits in eternal divine glory at the right hand of the Father, who, in dying, destroyed our death, and in rising, restored our life (again, as we say at mass). It has always bugged me that many see deification as a distinctly Eastern concept. I was at one mass where a Latin priest was so bold as to say in his homily “you are gods” and then went on to explain the teaching of deification without any reference to the East or Eastern theology…it is very much present in St. Thomas Aquinas without a doubt. (It was, appropriately, a Dominican priest who declared to the congregation “you are gods”)
CCC 460:
Of course, it must be emphasized that we will never truly BECOME God in the literal sense…we are and always will remain his creatures, while the three persons of the Blessed Trinity are the Creator. Our future glory, and the glory which Our Blessed Lady and the saints now enjoy, is totally DEPENDENT upon the glory of Christ…we will always remain finite beings and are given only a share of the divine life so as to enter into profound communion with God. In the East, it is emphasized that the process of deification is ongoing and eternal, with the saints in heaven ever approaching, but never reaching (as finite beings) the Divinity.
Deification = being made GodHi. I probably should have said “atonement theolgy”. Deification is Mortification is Sanctification, but we all use different words to describe it. I guess that’s what I was getting at. Does the East explain things the same way as the Orthodox? Thanks for your replies.
I think that it is given more than enough attention in the liturgy, but I would admit that I would like to hear more homilies on it…I think that many average Joe Latins are vaguely aware of the concept, but wouldn’t be able to articulate it. That being said, while there is the Laitn tradition of explicitly stating that “we are gods”, the emphasis tends to be more on our divine sonship as adopted children of God and co-heirs of Christ. In this sense, you more often hear Latin Catholics speaking of us becoming ‘sons of God’ rather than 'becoming God" (though both concepts speak to the same truth).Totally agree with everything You have posted and share your same frustrations…Do you think Theosis gets enough attention in the western church? Or is it that different aspects of it are highlighted?
Nicely put.The emphasis in the West is on the Beatific Vision of God. Theosis is not a concept that one can find in the Catechism (please correct me if I’m wrong) and, in any event, the West sees this much differently than the East.
Theosis allows us to participate in the Divine Energies of God and it is only in this way that we may participate in the Life of God. We cannot participate in God’s Divine Essence (for then, we truly would become God), nor in His Three Hypostases (for the same reason), but we can participate in His Divine Energies, as Palamism and Orthodox teaching explicate.
These Energies transfigure us by way of deification which impact is described in iconography where the halo of the Saints surrounds their actual heads/bodies which resemble the icon of Christ. This exists in the West, but in earlier Western iconography rather than the later Baroque style pictures where only the Humanity of Christ is depicted without much iconographic indication as to His Divinity - the same is true for later Western art of the Saints.
The West tends to emphasize the Humanity of Christ, truly having “humbled Himself to share in our humanity,” His Passion and suffering etc.
The East does emphasize the Divinity of Christ and His deified Humanity. “Whoever sees Me, sees the Father” etc.
We are called not only to reconciliation with God through Christ by the Spirit, but to fulfill our destiny as Christians to deification/Theosis in Christ.
(This morning I saw a fellow driving with a licence plate that said, “THEOSIS.”)
Alex
All of this is true, but in the East we do sometimes speak of “becoming God”, meaning of course everything that you just said. Elder Aemilianos of Simonopetra on the Holy Mountain (Mount Athos) once gave counsel to a monk who was under his charge and was asking him for help. The monk asked what to do beyond the rote repetition of the prayers in his rule (or a question of a similar nature). “Ah”, Elder Aemilianos said, “you must become God.”Of course, it must be emphasized that we will never truly BECOME God in the literal sense…we are and always will remain his creatures, while the three persons of the Blessed Trinity are the Creator. Our future glory, and the glory which Our Blessed Lady and the saints now enjoy, is totally DEPENDENT upon the glory of Christ…we will always remain finite beings and are given only a share of the divine life so as to enter into profound communion with God. In the East, it is emphasized that the process of deification is ongoing and eternal, with the saints in heaven ever approaching, but never reaching (as finite beings) the Divinity.
Deification is also very much a Western concept (though with a different emphasis)…so I’m not sure what the OP means by “deification vs mortification”. The idea that we are to share in the divine nature of Christ is very prominent in the Roman liturgy…as the priest says at every OF mass “May we come to share in the divinity of Christ who humbled himself to share in our humanity.” In both the West and East, Christ humbled himself in order to raise mankind to eternal glory, sharing in the divine life of the Trinity. In the West we are often reminded in the liturgy of the hours that humanity, in the person of Christ, already sits in eternal divine glory at the right hand of the Father, who, in dying, destroyed our death, and in rising, restored our life (again, as we say at mass). It has always bugged me that many see deification as a distinctly Eastern concept. I was at one mass where a Latin priest was so bold as to say in his homily “you are gods” and then went on to explain the teaching of deification without any reference to the East or Eastern theology…it is very much present in St. Thomas Aquinas without a doubt. (It was, appropriately, a Dominican priest who declared to the congregation “you are gods”)
CCC 460:
*The Word became flesh to make us “partakers of the divine nature”:78 "For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God."79 **“For the Son of God became man so that we might become God.”***80 "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."81
78 2 Pt 1:4.
79 St. Irenaeus, Adv. haeres. 3, 19, 1: PG 7/1, 939.
80 St. Athanasius, De inc. 54, 3: PG 25, 192B.
81 St. Thomas Aquinas, Opusc. 57, 1-4.
[Emphasis added]
That probably had more to do with the Italian Renaissance infatuation with the classics (and classical paganism) than with theosis. I don’t know how much of an influence this was, but his Greek tutor was Barlaam of Calabria, anathematized as a heretic by the East for his denial of theosis and of the essence/energies distinction.[Continued]
Petrarch, the great father of the Italian Renaissance, addresses the Blessed Mother as goddess in his famous canzone to the Blessed Virgin. While I wouldn’t recommend referring to the Mother of God as the goddess on a regular basis (as it would easily lead to confusion among the faithful and non-Catholics alike), it is, from a Latin perspective, theologically correct…for we are all made gods through baptism when we “put on Christ”. The emphasis in the West is more that we are incorporated into the divine sonship of Christ and thus it is more common for Latins to use the phrase “becoming sons of God” rather than “becoming gods” or “becoming God”, but all three phrases express the same truth.
It is not difficult to differentiate when we realize that there is only one Creator and many creatures, and no creature can become the Creator.[Continued]
Petrarch, the great father of the Italian Renaissance, addresses the Blessed Mother as goddess in his famous canzone to the Blessed Virgin. While I wouldn’t recommend referring to the Mother of God as the goddess on a regular basis (as it would easily lead to confusion among the faithful and non-Catholics alike), it is, from a Latin perspective, theologically correct…for we are all made gods through baptism when we “put on Christ”. The emphasis in the West is more that we are incorporated into the divine sonship of Christ and thus it is more common for Latins to use the phrase “becoming sons of God” rather than “becoming gods” or “becoming God”, but all three phrases express the same truth.