Denver Archbishop Seen as "Model of Courage"

  • Thread starter Thread starter JKirkLVNV
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Chaput is truly impressive. Articulate, compassionate, and cleaves to orthodoxy (not just conservatism).

He turns 64 this month. Is there an age range in which cardinals are usually appointed?
 
He turns 64 this month. Is there an age range in which cardinals are usually appointed?
I can’t find a specific article to cite in John Allen’s writings, but what I’ve read over the years leads me to believe that 65-75 is the normal age range these days. 80 is the age at which they no longer participate in voting for a new pope. I don’t know what happens if they turn 80 during the voting.

Chaput’s a good guy. I’ve only interacted with him once, and it was brief. I told him I appreciated him not being wishy-washy but taking consistent and articulate stands. He looked a little surprised, as if to say “who wouldn’t?” and replied “Then let’s be consistent together.”

He’s a good guy, but I don’t think Denver has any particular political or financial oomph that would propel him towards being made a cardinal. The big cities with large Roman Catholic populations get first dibs on cardinals, it seems.
 
I can’t find a specific article to cite in John Allen’s writings, but what I’ve read over the years leads me to believe that 65-75 is the normal age range these days. 80 is the age at which they no longer participate in voting for a new pope. I don’t know what happens if they turn 80 during the voting…
Here is some elevation ages for US bishops becoming Cardinal

Cardinal Mahony (LA) 55
Cardinal Maida (Detroit) 64
Cardinal Eagan (NY) 68
Cardinal McCarrick (former DC) 70
Cardinal George (Chicago) 61
Cardinal Rigali (Phil)
Cardinal O’Malley (Bos) 61
Cardinal Law (former Bos) 53
Cardinal Szoka (former Detroit) 60

From catholic-hierarchy.org
 
He’s a good guy, but I don’t think Denver has any particular political or financial oomph that would propel him towards being made a cardinal. The big cities with large Roman Catholic populations get first dibs on cardinals, it seems.
I’m wondering if we’re past the days of “Washington D.C. MUST have a cardinal,” etc. more toward “the man is the type that must be in the highest councils of the Church.” I hope so, at any rate. I can see moving this type of bishop to larger Catholic centers, but that seems unfair to Denver and other places, that they should loose their good bishops.
 
Cardinal Rigali (Phil)

From catholic-hierarchy.org
Cardinal Rigali was named a Cardinal on September 28, 2003 at the agae of 68. If you have time to read an impressive biograpy: archdiocese-phl.org/rigali/biorigali.htm . We are so blessed to have him here.

Archbishop Chaput is wonderful, and I am right on board with thanking him. His thoughts and actions show that he is absolutely one of our great leaders in the catholic church.
 
I’m wondering if we’re past the days of “Washington D.C. MUST have a cardinal,” etc. more toward “the man is the type that must be in the highest councils of the Church.” I hope so, at any rate.
I doubt it. Like it or not, politics and economics play a huge role in the relative influence of bishops. If you want a good guy to have influence, you have to give him the sort of diocese that allows him financially to send his proteges to Rome. If his folks are going to have influential futures, they need canon law training. Being a good priest isn’t enough.

Diplomatically, too, any government wants a high-ranker in major cities. You have to send someone with serious diplomatic credentials.
I can see moving this type of bishop to larger Catholic centers, but that seems unfair to Denver and other places, that they should loose their good bishops.
Disappointing, at any rate. But I can also see why you’d put your most talented shepherds in charge of the biggest flocks.

It’s not as if most bishops come from the diocese they shepherd. They didn’t raise him up, why should they have any special claim on him? I don’t see any evidence that Rome looks much at “chemistry,” either, the idea that maybe a particular bishop just happens to really fit well in one place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top