D
DuxBellorum
Guest
I appreciate your response. Though you have raised points I have heard before and for the sake of conversation I would like to share my opinions on some of them.One of the nicest people I know is fat and has a bad complexion. He’s great socially, he’s smart, and he’s great at organizing stuff and thinking about other people’s needs. He also has a wife and she is quite nice (and also plump).
Strictly speaking, this only means you are lovable in familial sense. I get your point though. However, you kind of concede that the gestures of telling a family member they are beautiful are empty in that they hold no commitment to how other humans behave toward you. My mother thinks I’m a swell guy but no one has been observed to share that opinion.Basically, they want you to be happy because they love you and they care about you. Ergo, you are lovable. That’s good!
My first problem with this is that it seems to endow the average 20-something male as being hyper-rational with his views on a romantic partnership. I’ll concede the possibility though. Second, this doesn’t deal with my initial claim that the person in question does not have the qualities necessary to attract the desired men. Essentially, you added in other tradeoffs that people factor into their romance risk calculus but that’s true of any decision. I’ll concede this too. That’s fair enough.Or they don’t like girls or are asexual. They might also recognize some major incompatibility with regard to life goals, career, religion, attitude toward money, hoped for family size, geographical loyalties, family relationships, etc. One could be attracted, but recognize a major point of incompatibility and not pursue a relationship.
Supposing what you say is true, then the Holy Spirit does nothing more than facilitate wholly naturalistic mechanisms of relationships. If we take that further though, then we are left with the Holy Spirit being a superfluous explanation of what we observe. Why should I postulate upward to God when I can cite academic literature that says that people choose spouses based off social status, income, shared values, and numerous other sociological and biological criteria? Why point to the Holy Spirit when I can point to Consumer Theory? Isn’t it curious that one can develop statistical models to predict if a man will suffer from, say, love shyness?Presumably, those couples are more compatible than the couples that don’t have a lot in common
I don’t want to come off as some sort of envious cynic (Lord knows that’s unattractive). I am genuinely intrigued with the apparent contradiction of what we observe to be the decision theory employed by people in picking partners and what many in the Church say occurs.
For example, no doubt someone in this thread suggest that if I lose weight then I’ll have a better chance of finding someone. I do not doubt this to be true. After all, that would fit with my view of how people pick partner. If the Holy Spirit were truly the sole determinant of most people’s spouse choices (a supposition that I’m fairly certain is not compatible to what Scripture tell us), then why is there a problem with divorce, infidelity, etc? Presumably, we should be observing the optimal marriages, and I don’t think that’s true.