Deuteronomy 25:11-12

  • Thread starter Thread starter Augustine3
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Augustine3

Guest
When two men are fighting and the wife of one intervenes to save her husband from the blows of his opponent, if she stretches out her hand and seizes the latter by his private parts, you shall chop off her hand without pity.

Why was this a crime?

Why was the punishment so severe?
 
I had to look this up myself, but Bible Gateway provided a commentary from one Matthew Henry that sheds some light on these verses
A law for the punishing of an immodest woman, Deut. 25:11, 12. The woman that by the foregoing law was to complain against her husband’s brother for not marrying her, and to spit in his face before the elders, needed a good measure of assurance; but, lest the confidence which that law supported should grow to an excess unbecoming the sex, here is a very severe but just law to punish impudence and immodesty. 1. The instance of it is confessedly scandalous to the highest degree. A woman could not do it unless she were perfectly lost to all virtue and honour. 2. The occasion is such as might in part excuse it; it was to help her husband out of the hands of one that was too hard for him. Now if the doing of it in a passion, and with such a good intention, was to be so severely punished, much more when it was done wantonly and in lust. 3. The punishment was that her hand should be cut off; and the magistrates must not pretend to be more merciful than God: Thy eye shall not pity her. Perhaps our Saviour alludes to this law when he commands us to cut off the right hand that offends us, or is an occasion of sin to us. Better put the greatest hardships that can be upon the body than ruin the soul for ever. Modesty is the hedge of chastity, and therefore ought to be very carefully preserved and kept up by both sexes.
 
When two men are fighting and the wife of one intervenes to save her husband from the blows of his opponent, if she stretches out her hand and seizes the latter by his private parts, you shall chop off her hand without pity.

Why was this a crime?

Why was the punishment so severe?
I think the better question would be is How were those two guys fighting? :nope:
 
I had to look this up myself, but Bible Gateway provided a commentary from one Matthew Henry that sheds some light on these verses
That had to be the worse commentary on scripture I have read in quite some time. The Leverite Law had to do with the woman’s husband being dead, and the punishment for the brother who refused to build up the offspring of the elder brother and his family is discussed at length. That passage has zero to do with that.

I have no clue what that passage references except it is not the Leverite Law. I will though research it and see if there is something that might shed light on the subject. It may just be obscure and no satisfying answer is to be found, but off we go.
 
When two men are fighting and the wife of one intervenes to save her husband from the blows of his opponent, if she stretches out her hand and seizes the latter by his private parts, you shall chop off her hand without pity.

Why was this a crime?

Why was the punishment so severe?
The crime could be an attempt to prevent offspring. It is abortive if damage is done. Much like the previous law which was also abortive. Willful prevention of offspring.
 
The following is from a Jewish commentary on the Torah.

chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/9989/jewish/Chapter-25.htm#showrashi=true
  1. you shall cut off her hand You shall not have pity.
You shall cut off her hand: [This verse is not to be understood literally, but rather, it means:] She must pay monetary damages to recompense the victim for the embarrassment he suffered [through her action. The amount she must pay is calculated by the court,] all according to the [social status] of the culprit and the victim (see B.K. 83b). But perhaps [it means that we must actually cut off] her very hand? [The answer is born out from a transmission handed down to our Rabbis, as follows:] Here, it says לֹא תָחוֹס,“do not have pity,” and later, in the case of conspiring witnesses (Deut. 19:21), the same expression, לֹא תָחוֹס, is used. [And our Rabbis taught that these verses have a contextual connection:] Just as there, in the case of the conspiring witnesses, [the literal expressions in the verse refer to] monetary compensation (see Rashi on that verse), so too, here, [the expression “You must cut off her hand” refers to] monetary compensation. — [Sifrei 25:161]

mnemotrix.com/metsudah/d06r.html#fn264
Verse 12: You shall sever her hand.

Monetary payment for his humiliation, varying according to the one who caused the humiliation, and the one who suffered it.260 But perhaps this refers literally to her hand? It is said here, “have no compassion,” and it is said elsewhere, concerning scheming witnesses,261 "Have no compassion."262 Just as there, the reference is to monetary payment,263 here, too, the reference is to monetary payment.264
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top