Deuteronomy and the Great Adventure Bible Timeline Reading Plan

Status
Not open for further replies.
makes sense. Yes, it is pricey for just one. May 2 we are starting Cavins’ Revelation and I am looking forward to it. I don’t see how a reading plan alone would work for this series. I’ll check out the agape, too. Always looking for good stuff!
 
I just looked at the attachment - it same as the 90 day reading plan in the back of the workbook I mentioned. I could be way off, but my guess is it is not intended as a typical read through the Bible chart. It looks like it’s meant to be used in conjunction with the study/workbook. Have you considered a chronological Bible - books and verses are placed in actual order. Again, best to you.
 
I’ll be looking at the other course called Agape that someone linked because that looks like maybe it is more for me and my needs as a longtime Catholic.
The Bible Timeline is a 24 week program with a great deal of reading of Scripture to accompany it. It is a challenge just to get through the recommended readings, let alone every book in the Bible.

The intention isn’t to cover every book in the Bible, but to provide a coherent overview of the narrative underlying the entire Bible. Once the overriding narrative is grasped using the provided readings, participants can more effectively move to other books and passages and make clearer sense of those.

I think your critique of Cavins and the Bible Timeline is misplaced because you are assessing it not from its intended purpose but from your expectations.

There is a very good, though non-denominational, YouTube channel and website called The Bible Project.

This project excels in placing the entire Bible and each book within its historical context and its place in salvation history. It also presents the literary and conceptual structure of each book using an engaging format.

The Old Testament books:


The New Testament books:


How to read the Bible:


Biblical Themes:


The Bible Project is not Catholic, precisely, but it isn’t overtly inconsistent with a Catholic view of the Bible. There may be some minor issues, but none that seem significant.
 
Last edited:
Deuteronomy and Isaiah are part of the required reading - whoever said they weren’t is wrong. Also, he does use more than Luke. He uses Matthew, Mark, John, Acts, Romans, I Corinthians, Galatians, Hebrews, I Peter, Revelation, I Timothy, Philippians, I Thessalonians, James, Colossians. I participated in a Bible Study at my Parish, we had workbooks and weekly dvd, 2 hours per week. We didn’t do anything via email. I loved it.
So which bible study was this (we are obviously talking about 2 different studies)? Was it from Ascension press?

Or are you just saying that these books are included in the timeline chart and you read them as Cavins was covering each historical period?
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Harry. I may check out The Bible Project later on when I have more time.

As for my critique of Cavins, I didn’t understand why he would leave out such important books. Other people are explaining to me his purpose, mission, what he’s trying to do etc and based on the thread responses I am understanding the approach better now, which was the point of the thread. I see now that it may work for some people but it is just not what I’m looking for.

It’s great that people are posting all of these free resources for learning more about the Bible on one’s own time.
 
Deuteronomy and Isaiah are part of the required reading - whoever said they weren’t is wrong.
Um, I think you may be talking about something totally different from what I’m discussing. If you look at the Reading Plan link I posted in my very first post, which is the Reading Plan straight from Ascension Press, it omits Deuteronomy, Isaiah, and a number of other books.

That is what we’re discussing.

It’s beginning to sound like you took some different or greatly expanded course.
 
Um, I think you may be talking about something totally different from what I’m discussing. If you look at the Reading Plan link I posted in my very first post, which is the Reading Plan straight from Ascension Press, it omits Deuteronomy, Isaiah, and a number of other books.

That is what we’re discussing.

It’s beginning to sound like you took some different or greatly expanded course.
No, it isn’t “totally different.” The reading plan you are referencing isn’t a stand alone plan, it is the plan of readings (an outline really) of the Scripture readings that attend the Great Adventure Bible Timeline.

The reading plan doc you linked to is from this page:

https://biblestudyforcatholics.com/downloads/

It lists downloadable resources for the Great Adventure Bible Timeline, which are intended to “…help you plan, promote, and facilitate your Great Adventure Bible study.” Hence my post is very much on target since you assumed the reading plan was meant as a stand alone one. It wasn’t.

I know this because I’ve lead the program about three times.
 
Last edited:
It lists downloadable resources for the Great Adventure Bible Timeline, hence my post is very much on target since you assumed the reading plan was meant as a stand alone one. It wasn’t.

I know this because I’ve lead the program about three times.
Ascension Press offers the reading plan for free. It was promoted as getting an e-mail every three days to help you think while you read. (As I mentioned above, most of the e-mails just never arrived, not even in spam). Nothing was said about downloading.

The expanded course, I know nothing about as like I said I am not in a position to take the course or spend the amount of money on the materials that they are asking.

If the reading plan is actually significantly different from what they teach in the course, this is a communications gap with the marketing coming from Ascension Press. At this point, between the abbreviated reading plan and your and the other person’s description, I’m now completely confused as to what this course is all about, what it covers, etc.

My communications with Ascension Press over this whole thing have not been great. I’m ready to move on to Agape which is both free of charge and also seems to be much easier to understand and work with for those of us who cannot attend a weekly class.
 
Last edited:
LOL - I took the class and this back and forth is confusing me, I could imagine how confusing it is for others.

The course focuses on the 14 books of the Bible listed on the reading plan. The lectures are laid out the same way though the exercises in the workbook and the lectures sometimes cross into other parts of the Bible. If you want I can pull out my workbook and list the 24 lecture topics from each session.
 
Last edited:
Ascension Press offers the reading plan for free. It was promoted as getting an e-mail every three days to help you think while you read. (As I mentioned above, most of the e-mails just never arrived, not even in spam). Nothing was said about downloading.
I’ve not seen the promotion you describe above, but if the reading plan was described as a standalone, then there is a communications gap with whoever is promoting the material.
If the reading plan is actually significantly different from what they teach in the course, this is a communications gap with the marketing coming from Ascension Press. At this point, between the abbreviated reading plan and your and the other person’s description, I’m now completely confused as to what this course is all about, what it covers, etc.
I don’t see a particular reason to be as confused as you seem to be. @Joe_5859 provided a good overview video of the program in post #6. If you look at the section headers in the reading plan these name the periods of salvation history. The readings under each depict a brief sample or characterization of that period from Scripture. So the reading plan gives the timeline of salvation history (the overall narrative of the Bible) which you can use to see the context within which each passage or book it was taken from was written.
My communications with Ascension Press over this whole thing have not been great. I’m ready to move on to Agape which is both free of charge and also seems to be much easier to understand and work with for those of us who cannot attend a weekly class.
Fair enough. The reason that the program is expensive is the time and resources that have gone into developing it. Whether those were worth the cost of the program to a user can only be determined by those who have gone through it.

Your question in the opening post asked about the Bible Timeline program so you seemed to be aware of it from the beginning. It seems odd that you now appear confused about its existence or the connection of the reading plan to it.
Does the formal Bible Study course discuss this book of the Bible separately? The timeline reading plan seems to be sending a message that Deuteronomy is not important. Surely that can’t be the case since Jesus quoted it so much.
So to answer your specific question: No there is no such message in the “formal Bible study course” that the book of Deuteronomy is not important. The actual significance of the book (and Mosaic Law) needs to be seen within the context of the entire narrative, which is the main focus of the formal program.
 
LOL - I took the class and this back and forth is confusing me, I could imagine how confusing it is for others.

The course focuses on the 14 books of the Bible listed on the reading plan. The lectures are laid out the same way though the exercises in the workbook and the lectures sometimes cross into other parts of the Bible. If you want I can pull out my workbook and list the 24 lecture topics from each session.
Thanks for the offer of listing the lecture topics. I don’t want to put you to extra trouble; also, it’s possible that those materials may be copyrighted, so we need to be careful about reposting stuff from them.

I think at this point I’ve gotten a good idea from the posts of why the books I wondered about were omitted from the Reading Plan and exactly what the goal of the Great Adventure Bible Study is. I also think this course is really designed to be given by a presenter, not for people trying to do self-study, so that may be a reason for the Ascension Press website not communicating to me clearly.

Thanks all for your (name removed by moderator)ut, it was helpful.
 
If you want I can pull out my workbook and list the 24 lecture topics from each session.
I think you mean the 24 lecture topics that comprise the entire program. There aren’t 24 lecture topics in EACH session, unless by “session” you mean the entire program. The program is made up of 24 sessions.
 
Last edited:
Great Adventiure is like a jetboat across Lake Michigan or a Circle Line tour of NYC, gives you an overview, an aquaintance and the high points. It is not meant to be a “read the Bible cover to cover” plan because for many people who have never read the entire Bible, they get bogged down in Leviticus, Numbers and by Deuteronomy they throw in the towel.

GA moves fast. Think of it as a “Reader’s Digest Condensed Version”.
 
That is exactly who it is designed for, the person who has never read the entire Bible.
 
Ok - this was the outline from when I took the study (which is pretty identical to the reading plan that was posted):

Session 1 - Overview
Session 2 and 3 - Early World (Genesis)
Session 4 and 5 - Patriarchs (Genesis)
Session 6 and 7 - Egypt and Exodus
Session 8 - Dessert Wanderings
Session 9 and 10 - Conquest & Judges
Session 11 and 12 - Royal Kingdom
Session 13 and 14 - Divided Kingdom
Session 15 - Exile
Session 16 - Return
Session 17 - Maccabean Revolt
Session 18-20 - Messianic Fullfillment (Mostly Luke)
Session 21-23 - The Church (Acts)
Session 24 - Conclusion
 
Last edited:
I agree. Tisbear is looking for something different and evaluating on different expectations. I found the course incredibly beneficial and outstanding. Tried to read the bible on my own first and gave up. Go ahead and knock me for it because I just couldn’t do it. Maybe I’m not as “Catholic-y” or Godly as others but this helped me tremendously. Now that I have better idea of what I’m reading I get so much more out of it. Now I’m reading thru the rest of the books.
 
Have a peek at the Bible Project videos I posted above. They might even add more clarity.
 
I found the course incredibly beneficial and outstanding. Tried to read the bible on my own first and gave up.
I agree 100% - this approach should be incorporated into Catholic high school education in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top