G
Gregory_I
Guest
I thought I remember reading somewhere that the Diaconate was actually considered a degree of the priesthood in Orthodoxy. is that right? That’s why Deacons are referred to as Father Deacon?
Well, they are ordained. And Holy Orders does leave an indelible mark on the soul much like Baptism and Confirmation.I did hear something about this…something like once a deacon forever a deacon,
same as once a priest forever a priest.
Those who are in the seminaries who become Deacons are eying the priesthood. Those who eye becoming permanent deacons are less. Perhaps the requirement of education becomes a hindrance for some who have regular jobs.One of the major problems we have here in the U.S. is that the diaconate is mostly used as a stepping stone into the priesthood. Many parishes do not have a regular deacon.
Check out the Catechism of the Catholic Church’s section on Holy Orders. There you will find that even Rome considers the diaconate to be a “degree” of priesthood. The fullest manifestation of the priesthood of Christ is the bishop.I thought I remember reading somewhere that the Diaconate was actually considered a degree of the priesthood in Orthodoxy. is that right? That’s why Deacons are referred to as Father Deacon?
Canon Law has been ammended from the 1983 CIC canon law, just now in 2010, through Omnium in Mentem. The episcopate and presbyterate act in the person of Christ the Head, the deacon is empowered to serve.Check out the Catechism of the Catholic Church’s section on Holy Orders. There you will find that even Rome considers the diaconate to be a “degree” of priesthood. The fullest manifestation of the priesthood of Christ is the bishop.
Deacons are ordained clergy but I don’t think the title “Father” relates to any thought of being ordained to the priesthood in the future. All male monastics are referred to as Father, whereas those who are not ordained would be called “Brother” in the Latin Catholic Church (I know your question is re Orthodox, but ECs use the same titles as Orthodox for these, which are not the same titles the Latin Church uses), just as Orthodox/EC nuns are called Mother, when in the Latin Catholic Church they would be called Sister. These are the different ancient Church customs.I thought I remember reading somewhere that the Diaconate was actually considered a degree of the priesthood in Orthodoxy. is that right? That’s why Deacons are referred to as Father Deacon?
This wasn’t Fr. Christopher Fadok by chance, was it?For about a year we had a seminarian often with us who was ordained to the priesthood last spring. Before his ordination he served as a deacon with us. This was because he was a “transitional” deacon within the Latin Church (in the Dominican Order of Preachers, by birth/baptism a UGC). Since he was a monk, he was a “hierodeacon” during that time before his ordination to the priesthood. Now he is formally Rev. Hieromonk N.
Using this line of reasoning…is a priest a transitional priest because he may someday be ordained a bishop? A deacon is a deacon, a priest is a priest and a bishop is a bishop. A deacon who remains a deacon is in NO WAY less of a deacon. CLERICALISM SUCKS!Those who are in the seminaries who become Deacons are eying the priesthood. Those who eye becoming permanent deacons are less. Perhaps the requirement of education becomes a hindrance for some who have regular jobs.
Not that I am implying that, but of course many who go to a seminary has the intentions of becoming a priest.Using this line of reasoning…is a priest a transitional priest because he may someday be ordained a bishop? A deacon is a deacon, a priest is a priest and a bishop is a bishop. A deacon who remains a deacon is in NO WAY less of a deacon. CLERICALISM SUCKS!![]()
Yes.This wasn’t Fr. Christopher Fadok by chance, was it?
I don’t what that statement means.Not that I am implying that, but of course many who go to a seminary has the intentions of becoming a priest.
off topic… but looking at your post reminded me… we have an icon of Saint Thérèse on our iconostasis at OLF. Our iconostatis was designed with reference to that in the Russicum seminarian’s chapel because our Russian Catholic priests trained there. Our choir director also has a special devotion to her.
Thank you far saying more clearly and precisely what I tried to say in a very tortured couple of sentences, LOL. I’m typically badly in need of a copy editor!Father is also used for many monastics, as well as major clerics. It’s not, in Byzantine use, indicative of ordination; it’s a sign of respect, and that respect is due to schemamonks, priests, deacons, hierodeacons, hieromonks, and bishops. It often is extended to all fully professed monks.
All male monastics are referred to as Father, whereas those who are not ordained would be called “Brother” in the Latin Catholic Church (I know your question is re Orthodox, but ECs use the same titles as Orthodox for these, which are not the same titles the Latin Church uses), just as Orthodox/EC nuns are called Mother, when in the Latin Catholic Church they would be called Sister. These are the different ancient Church customs.
I haven’t seen Fr. Christopher since he was just Brother Christopher. When I was Confirmed he was at the priory here in Seattle, and he and I talked many times about the Eastern traditions. I was attending St. Joseph’s Melkite Mission, but I had to be Confirmed in the Latin Church and went through Blessed Sacrament. Br. Christopher also worked with me on discernment when I was strongly considering becoming a Dominican myself. I can’t wait to stop by Blessed Sacrament and see him again, now that he’s a hierofriar.Yes.I forgot that you’re in Seattle! If you see him give him a big hug from me. We miss him! We’re in touch by email but it ain’t the same. We have a little “Fr Christopher” section on our bulletin board at OLF
I learned last week, happily, there’s another fellow discerning a vocation with the Dominicans and he would want to serve bi-ritually, tho this fellow isn’t an EC by birth so a bit different situation from Christopher’s.