D
DIT
Guest
Deacon Canicus:
There is very little uniformity in the following about deacons: 1) vestiments; 2) clerical dress; 3) knowledge of what deacons are or do; 4) the need for the diaconate; and there are so much more- this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Catholics really don’t have a clue about their religion - I am not saying their faith - but their religion. The clergy is such a basic function that the faithful are exposed to on a weekly (sometimes daily basis) and they really don’t grasp it. Imagine what their knowledge is on the real important items of our religion.
I think we need to get the faithful back to adult CCD (call it what you want). I think we need to teach the people in the pews on Sundays. We need to get them interested in their faith and their religion. Ignorance is really not an option.
The diaconate needs to step up too. The leaders (ie. the clergy)need to decide what to do with the diaconate and whether they want deacons to truly be part of the clergy and not just a level of lay ministry. It seems some of the clergy, and the faithful seem to think as well, that the diaconate is a lay ministry.
We tend to confuse ourselves by our inaction toward clarity.http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/icons/icon9.gif
This was my point for posting this question. As we can see here, there are very different “rules” or practices that happen in all our parishes and diocese.I’m amazed by this thread.
First, the STOLE is the vestment proper to all the ordained. It is worn over the left shoulder and fastened at his side by a Deacon, over the shoulders by a priest (used to be crossed at the chest in the old Mass) and by the Bishop hanging straight down (as priests and Bishops do now). In addition, Bishops wear the pectoral Cross (should be worn under the Chasuble).
The stole is always worn and should be worn under the chasuble or dalmatic. The damatic is the vestment proper to the Deacon - not the stole. The unfortunate practice of wearing just the stole is discouraged clearly in the GIRM and in recent documents on the liturgy. Deacons have worn only the stole for reasons of simplicity or to distinguish themselves from the priest - however people still call us “father” after Mass.
The Dalmatic should be worn at every Mass, and at the other occaisions when it is specified - it cannot be banned or restricted to “transitional” Deacons - there is NO difference in the Sacrament of Holy Orders received by a Deacon, transitional or otherwise.
By the way, a Bishop, who possesses the fullness of Holy Orders, should wear a dalmatic under his Chasuble (it’s a lighter weight, Episcopal dalmatic) though this practive has fallen by the wayside.
I know they are exepnsive - but every Deacon should have some - they don’t need to match exactly - vestments are not a “uniform”, though it always looks nicer when they do.
Deacons are NOT Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist. They are ordained and ordinary ministers to distribute Holy Communion at Mass.
Also, by the way, when presiding at a wake or funeral, liturgy of the hours or benediction, a Deacon would wear a stole and cope, as well as use the humeral veil when appropriate.
Amazing that after all these years we are still so poorly informed on the Diaconate.
There is very little uniformity in the following about deacons: 1) vestiments; 2) clerical dress; 3) knowledge of what deacons are or do; 4) the need for the diaconate; and there are so much more- this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Catholics really don’t have a clue about their religion - I am not saying their faith - but their religion. The clergy is such a basic function that the faithful are exposed to on a weekly (sometimes daily basis) and they really don’t grasp it. Imagine what their knowledge is on the real important items of our religion.
I think we need to get the faithful back to adult CCD (call it what you want). I think we need to teach the people in the pews on Sundays. We need to get them interested in their faith and their religion. Ignorance is really not an option.
The diaconate needs to step up too. The leaders (ie. the clergy)need to decide what to do with the diaconate and whether they want deacons to truly be part of the clergy and not just a level of lay ministry. It seems some of the clergy, and the faithful seem to think as well, that the diaconate is a lay ministry.
We tend to confuse ourselves by our inaction toward clarity.http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/icons/icon9.gif