1ST:
That makes sense that it is a consequence of free will, but God had to create the idea that someone could disobey him. And that would be the essence of ‘evil’. … But instead he created the idea of evil. Right? I’m still kinda confused.
We only KNOW what is evil because he puts within us a seed or a foundation of good. We only recognize what is evil because we know what good is. God created good and that is sufficient for us to know evil, because we know what the opposite of good is.
I know a hole when I see one, only because I know what dirt looks like and that there should be dirt there, but is not. Likewise, we know what is sin and what is evil, because God created good and made us desire truth and love.
When someone deviates from this… we know this is evil. That someone CAN deviate from this, is because of freewill.
But God no more gave us evil, as I can hand you a hole or sell you darkness.
2ND:
… He could have created free will and said that if someone didnt obey him, nothing bad would happen. It just wouldnt be good.
Choices without consequences are not real choices. There can not be justice without consequences to our choices. Love can not exist without a freewill to choose.
So God would have created a mockery of choice, if he created a world where our choices didn’t impact our universe. It would be a kind of quasi-static universe, where no matter what we did… nothing evil happened.
NO, instead, he created a dynamic world, where our actions impact the events and things around us. Where our actions have consequences and where we have the freewill to love one another.
Choice, and by extension, freewill, was logically created so that we could love. However, choice implies that we can also choose badly and rebel. It is intrinsic and integral.
You can not have true choice or really have freewill and NOT have the ability to rebel.
So God created GOOD things… like freewill and choice, so that we can love and our actions matter. It is OUR perversion of this which rebels against his design and creates sin and evil in the process.
3RD:
I dont agree that the absense of good is evil because there are things that are neutral.
That’s a slightly different argument, which I don’t think we can cover here. But suffice to say, without getting too derailed, I’d argue that “gray” areas typically exist when someone’s sense of right and wrong, good and evil, get muddled up or confused. Anotherwards, the person dwelling in the gray area has an illformed conscience and a weak sense of morality.
But that’s another topic altogether.