Did Jesus have siblings?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hellopeople
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ahhh!! If James is the FULL BROTHER of Jesus then he is the son of Mary and the son of the Holy Spirit. That makes James divine.

James is NOT the FULL brother of Jesus. Surely you see this, MT, yes? It is settled, correct?
Ahhh, I see where you’re going. James, even if he was the son of Joseph and Mary, would still be a half-brother of Jesus, if Jesus was born of the Mary/Holy Spirit.
 
Major Tom lists himself as a Unitarian. He does not believe the Bible is divinely inspired. Unitarians are more divided than regular protestants. About the only thing that unites them is they deny the Trinity. Some protestants denominations do not think of them as being christian. For most, if not all of them, the Catholic Church does not recognize their baptism as being valid.
You know, I suppose it’s possible to accept the Trinity and still consider oneself Unitarian. The main tenet, if I had to boil it down, is that the individual is free to pursue their own free and responsible path in seeking God.
 
Paul calls the Apostle James the brother of the Lord. There were two Apostles named James. The Bible says one was the son of Zebedee and the other the son of Alpheaus. See Mt 10:2-3 for this. Neither one is a son of Joseph. So how could they be sibling brothers? But tradition holds that Alpheaus was the brother of Joseph and that would make James, the son of Alpheaus, Jesus’ brother by first century Jewish reckoning. So Paul calling James the brother of the Lord would be correct by Jewish reckoning.
Paul called himself an apostle. Obviously he didn’t just think that the original 12 were apostles. So it is quite easy to think that James the brother of Jesus is different than James the apostles.
 
I’m assuming that you’re operating from a premise of: if someone was cathechized well, they couldn’t possibly leave, as your faith is the only true one. Would that be accurate?
Nope. I can see your poor catechesis (not your fault, probably) from your posts. You demonstrate a very uninformed understanding of Catholicism.

Did you know, prior to coming to CAFs, what the Immaculate Conception was, just from your Catholic education?

(I’m assuming you know, now, that the Immaculate Conception is NOT the miraculous conception of Jesus, right?)
 
You know, I suppose it’s possible to accept the Trinity and still consider oneself Unitarian. The main tenet, if I had to boil it down, is that the individual is free to pursue their own free and responsible path in seeking God.
So can you be a Unitarian and, from your own free and responsible path in seeking God, believe that there are many gods?
 
Nope. I can see your poor catechesis (not your fault, probably) from your posts. You demonstrate a very uninformed understanding of Catholicism.

Did you know, prior to coming to CAFs, what the Immaculate Conception was, just from your Catholic education?

(I’m assuming you know, now, that the Immaculate Conception is NOT the miraculous conception of Jesus, right?)
You know, that would have been my answer. Please edify me.

IS this the question that establishes proper cathechesis? 🙂
 
So can you be a Unitarian and, from your own free and responsible path in seeking God, believe that there are many gods?
I’d have to say that that one’s out of bounds. Hence, the “uni-” prefix to Unitarian.
 
I’d have to say that that one’s out of bounds. Hence, the “uni-” prefix to Unitarian.
So this statement you made is incorrect?

“if I had to boil it down, is that the individual is free to pursue their own free and responsible path in seeking God.”
 
You know, that would have been my answer. Please edify me.
“The Blessed Virgin Mary…”

The subject of this immunity from original sin is the person of Mary at the moment of the creation of her soul and its infusion into her body.
“…in the first instance of her conception…”
Source here.

Still waiting for your source for the Middle Ages crossing yourself thing. (Yes, I know it hasn’t even been 24 hours since I asked for your source. ;))
IS this the question that establishes proper cathechesis? 🙂
Do you not think that it demonstrates how poorly catechized you were? I mean, the Immaculate Conception is a very, very basic teaching.
 
I’m still in the room!
Of course!

I was just letting inkaneer know that you were baptized Catholic.
Is that sarcasm I detect…? 🙂
Not at all. I rarely use sarcasm. Rarely. (So please refrain from examples of past posts in which I have succumbed. ;))

I was simply stating that you feel you know the Catholic faith well.
 
So this statement you made is incorrect?

“if I had to boil it down, is that the individual is free to pursue their own free and responsible path in seeking God.”
Very good question.

There is one god. He has expressed himself to people thru the many world religious traditions (Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity, etc.) You are free to explore God thru the tradition(s) that are best for you.

Now I suppose that, if you identify with the Hindu tradition, one might say that you are being polytheistic. However, I believe that Hinduism acknowledges that there is one god, manifesting itself in the many other godly forms.

I’ve been told that some Unitarians are atheist. Frankly, I haven’t reconciled that. I can understood reconciling agnosticism with Unitarianism, but I can’t wrap my arms around atheism and Unitarianism.
 
Of course!

I was just letting inkaneer know that you were baptized Catholic.

Not at all. I rarely use sarcasm. Rarely. (So please refrain from examples of past posts in which I have succumbed. ;))

I was simply stating that you feel you know the Catholic faith well.
Got it!
 
Very good question.

There is one god.
How do you know this?

Again, how is it that you come to your belief, if you’re not certain that Scripture is inspired?

Do you believe God is Love? If so, why?

Do you believe we’re made in the image and likeness of God? If so, why?
 
**Unitarians amd Mainline Protestants **

Just for the record, I find that millions of mainline Protestants would agree in large measure with the Unitarians when it comes to treasuring freedom of belief. Bible study groups in mainline churches permit people to interpret scriptural passages in many different ways, without approved" or “heretical” ways.
Code:
 How do most mainline Protestants differ from Unitarians? Let me suggest 4-5 likely ways, depending upon the individual congregation.

 1. Most mainline Protestants focus considerably attention upon Jesus, while many Unitarian churches lift up other religious leaders (Buddha, etc) as of equal importance.

 2. Most mainline Protestant churches have a very diverse membership, ranging from conservatives theologically speaking to very liberal, almost identifical with Unitarianism.

 3. Worship in most mainline Protestant churches will include traditional hymns such as "What a Friend We Have in Jesus" or "Christ the Lord is Risen Today" which are sung by people who may not always agree with them literally. Mainline Protestants have a big appetite for symbolic traditions. Some will even recite creeds that they may not believe in - heretical Episcopalians, for example - because they are valued as part of tradition. Like the English who know that the monarchy is archaic but support it anyway because of its emotional pull. Unitarians are more literalistic, and hymns are re-written so that they can be sung by freethinkers without qualms. 

 4. Traditional mainline church still value baptism and communion, while most Unitarian churches place far less (if any) emphasis on those two Protestant sacraments/ordinances.

  5. Unitarians as a whole are a more intellectual crowd, less diverse than mainline Protestants, and often social activists, taking very liberal positions on such issues as abortion and gay rights. You will rarely find an uneducated person among Unitarians, and there is very little demographic 'cross section' among them. Few African-Americans, for example. This is not stated necessarily as a criticism, but as an observation. Unitarians are inclined to be much less tolerant of traditional Christianity than mainline Protestants. If a Unitarian argued for the Trinity he might be viewed as a 'heretic'. Among most mainline Protestants there is a wider spectrum of beliefs and the tolerance that goes along with it. There would also be more diversity in patterns of worship.  Mainline Protestants are more likely to be more divided on social issues - abortion, gay issues, etc.- and they range from very low to quite high when it comes to liturgy.

  Most evangelical Protestants, like traditionalist Catholics, would look upon Unitarians as non-Christians in that they do not believe that Christ was God incarnate, that he died for our sins and that he rose from the dead.

 But they're all children of God and merit our respect.
 
By Church I think he just meant a community of believers. I don’t think he meant a church as we know it today.
Why then, does the NT go into so much detail (Acts 20:17,28; Eph. 4:11; etc.) explaining the hierarchical structure of the Church?
 
Sir Knight, I pray you are having a blessed day. You wrote, “Even if it did, I’d rather stick with official church teaching as found in the CCC rather than something on youtube.” Well my friend THE LINK WORKS; youtube.com/watch?v=5cTr8OoGMA0. Please copy and paste the link.

This is a message from Rev. Msgr. Eric R. Barr, Episcopal Vicar for Clergy and Religious for the Diocese of Rockford, IL. Bishop Thomas G. Doran is the bishop of this diocese. The Rockford Diocese covers 11 counties in Northern Illinois. Msgr. Barr’s e-mail is : vicarforclergy@rockforddiocese.org and his telephone numbers are: (815) 399-4300 and Fax (815) 399-5266.

I believe one of the main roles of this forum is to share and educate each other according with official teachings of the church, not to propagate our own interpretations or agenda. The message from Rev. Msgr. Eric Barr, who is an church official representing Bishop Thomas G. Doran, should be considered of great importance. If you have any concerns about the validity of the message of Msgr. Barr you are welcome to contact the Diocese of Rockford, IL @ www.rockforddiocese,org. I encourage all my friends to listen to his message using that link. :blessyou:
Being a Catholic, I have no interest in an* Episcopal* point of view.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top