Did Lucifer earn his Glory?

[Serpent_of_Paradise]

“How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, who didst rise in the morning? how art thou fallen to the earth, that didst wound the nations?” Isaiah 14:1234:
Lucifer is generally presented as being the most glorious angel God made. Did Lucifer earn his glory, … or was it freely given to him?

 

[John121]

Everyone earns something so without asking God I would come to a logical conclusion that he did.

 

[fhansen]

I’d think his glory was a gift from God, as a bright reflection of His own image. And that Lucifer did a pretty good job of forfeiting it.

 

[VanitasVanitatum]

God freely gives and He isn’t required to except for His nature’s sake.

 

[Mary888]

In the near context apparently Lucifer was struggling to get to Heaven and he fell. So part of his glory is definitely earned?
[11] Thy pride is brought down to hell, thy carcass is fallen down: under thee shall the moth be strewed, and worms shall be thy covering. [12] How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, who didst rise in the morning? how art thou fallen to the earth, that didst wound the nations? [13] And thou saidst in thy heart: I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God, I will sit in the mountain of the covenant, in the sides of the north. [14] I will ascend above the height of the clouds, I will be like the most High. [15] But yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, into the depth of the pit.
The bold part is mine to argue that part of his glory appears to be a personal effort of him.

But the Douay Rheims Bible says this passage is from a letter dedicated to the king of Babylon. So the fall in this passage is actually about the fall of a man, who was given glory and lost it.
[12] “O Lucifer”: O day star. All this, according to the letter, is spoken of the king of Babylon. It may also be applied, in a spiritual sense, to Lucifer the prince of devils, who was created a bright angel, but fell by pride and rebellion against God.
Since this passage links the destiny of a man (given glory) to that of the Enemy, then the idea that the Enemy was given glory is also sustained.
We just don’t know.