M
Mickey
Guest
Insults, arrogance, and judjementalism is not Christ-like.What a fool you are, and how stupid to suggest those who protest against lairs, say that Mary is God
Insults, arrogance, and judjementalism is not Christ-like.What a fool you are, and how stupid to suggest those who protest against lairs, say that Mary is God
Who redeemed mankind?Wait a minute who is saying that Mary is God? God created Mary for one purpose and that was to be the first human Tabernical. No one is saying that she is God (the only people I ever hear say this is protestents). We are saying that God created her without sin so that she can be the mother of God, because God could not have been present in sin. Yes, Mary needed a redeemer just like all of man kind. Mary was a perfect example of how one serves our Lord, she always said yes to God and there for God favored her.
Absolutely not. Being created sinless, without original sin, is the way God created Adam and Eve. It did NOT make Adam or Eve God, nor perfect like God. If we look at Scripture we find Elizabeth pregnant with John, when the Holy Spirit filled her and the child lept in her womb. John was filled with the Holy Spirit in the womb of his mother Elizabeth, so he too was born free from original sin, again, this does not make him God or perfect like God. This is an error to think being sinless equates to equal to God.if mary was sinless she would have done just that!! But it would mean Mary was God and perfect like God.
niether is stupidityInsults, arrogance, and judjementalism is not Christ-like.
It seems that the same person who taught you theology, also taught you how to spell.niether is stupidity
I would suggest to others not to allow Mr. 777 to hijack this topic, which was about Mary’s labor pains. If Mr. 777 is confused as to who redeemed mankind, he is more than free to start a new thread and ask away.Who redeemed mankind?
Michael you are so full of hate. I really pray that the holy sprite will enter your heart and soften it. Yes I believe that Jesus is the the redeemer of mankind, he is my Lord and I will always try to live a life of goodness and seek to be like Mary and always say yes to God.Who redeemed mankind?
Michael, I agree it does not “exclusively” refer to Mary, but reading rev 12 it is painfully obvious it refers to Mary and it ALSO refers to Isreal, and also to His Catholic Church. To disavow the reference to Mary is being closed hearted. And yes I just coined the phrase… lolThe verse in revelation you are refering to did not exclusively refer to Mary as the woman it refered to ISREAL AND THE TO THE CHURCH.
Mary was in both i agree but The woman depicted was Isreal and the holy nation and its offspring THE CHURCH through FAITH IN IT’S messaih JESUS CHRIST, for we are of the Holy nation OF ISREAL AND A ROYAL PREISTHOOD through faith in the Messaih Jesus Christ NOT through faith in Mary.!!
Michael.
So much hatred for a 16 yr old. How sad.and also to His Catholic Church
Make that his church
full stop
and he knows his own.
I understand what you are saying, but the passage in Genesis that prophecies the Redeemer says nothing about his Mother being born with or without original sin. It’s not that explicit, is it?Actually there really wasn’t an exception to the judgement God passed upon Eve since God did say that there will be a women who well be the new Eve. This means that Mary was born like Eve without origanial sin.
It did say that she would be at enmity with the devil, which certainly implies a certain amount of sinlessness. But not explicit, true.I understand what you are saying, but the passage in Genesis that prophecies the Redeemer says nothing about his Mother being born with or without original sin. It’s not that explicit, is it?
posted by Michael
God incarnate, in the form of Jesus Christ, could not be that intimate, carried in a vessel full of sin. God was spiritually present with the others, but with Mary, He was physically present.For
as you wrote
“We are saying that God created her without sin so that she can be the mother of God, because God could not have been present in sin.”
How then was he present in the Prophets and present in Elizabeths womb and in John?
Not so, Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit also, as in baptism, when you are filled with the Holy Spirit you are freed of you sin, or as you say “sinless” so, John was not in a sinful creature at that moment. Elizabeth of course was not considered “without” sin, she therefore could have sinned afterward. John also was NOT God. The difference (one of the many) between Mary and Elizabeth is that Elizabeth continued to sin, Mary could not, since she held the blessed Jesus in her womb. Mary could not have sinned because Jesus is God, it isn’t something we say she was so great for, and the reason was Jesus, not Mary.Elizabeth pregnant with John, when the Holy Spirit filled her and the child leapt in her womb. John was filled with the Holy Spirit in the womb of his mother Elizabeth,
The above could not be so according to you.
Because God could not be in Sin.
For as you wrote “We are saying that God created her without sin so that she can be the mother of God, because God could not have been present in sin.”
How then was he present in the Prophets and present in Elizabeth’s womb and in John?