A
aspirant
Guest
It is not good for the man to be alone, as 2:18 says, but he should have a help corresponding to him, a strengthening partner. (Translations vary, of course, but the one term implies help/aid/rescue/strength and the other implies fitting/suited/corresponding.) This need is not met by the animals (vv. 19-20), though they come from the earth like the man (cf. vv. 7, 19). Though both a man and an animal are bodies, from the earth, the first is a person and the latter is not; the animal cannot be a corresponding help, cannot be a true partner. It is important that the man understand this for himself to more fully appreciate what will happen next: The woman is made from the rib of man (vv. 21-22). This is fitting, to borrow Thomas Aquinas’ words, “to signify the social union of man and woman, for the woman should neither rule over man, and so she was not made from his head; nor was it right for her to be subject to man’s contempt as his slave, and so she was not made from his feet.” From the man’s side, as Byzantine_Wolf put it, she is made to stand side by side with the man. And the man recognizes immediately that she is not merely a bodily creature, like the animals, but also a person like himself: “bone of my bones, flesh of my flesh!” (v. 23) Here is the corresponding help, the strengthening partner, to the man. And truly, he is to her as well. These two, each an embodied person, each with his or her own way of being fully human, can share communion.And how did you arrive at this based on the narrative?
There is a lot more information conveyed in the passage, but that’s a rough sketch of some of it.