P
patrick457
Guest
If by ‘minor’ you mean ‘of minor importance’, historically I don’t think so.Patrick,
Thank you for taking the time. Very interesting. I had a Jewish friend who told me Isaiah was considered a minor prophet by Jews.
The book of Isaiah, along with the Psalms and Deuteronomy, were the three most popular and most commonly used works during the time of Jesus. These three have the most copies in the Dead Sea Scrolls, and are the most quoted / alluded to books in the New Testament.
But then again, since in Jewish thought Moses is the greatest prophet, I guess pretty much every prophet that came after him could be considered ‘minor’ in comparison - since all subsequent prophecy was thought to be merely an expression of what Moses had already seen.
If he’s talking about the division of the OT books, in modern-day Judaism, what we would call the ‘Historical Books’ (Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings) are termed the ‘Former Prophets’, while most prophetic books proper (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, the Twelve Minor Prophets) are the ‘Latter Prophets’. (Daniel and Ruth are not part of the Prophets section - they belong to the ‘Writings’.)
Well, since Scripture doesn’t tell us we can only guess.What are your thoughts about Mary having private revelations? I think she did and see nothing wrong with it. We don’t know about them because they were private.