Did Pope Benedict pray toward Mecca?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aydan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
so does the VAtican state that muslims go to heaven even though they deny the Holy Trinity
The Church in her wisdom, states that there is hope for all Non-Catholics that they may see the beatific vision, and attain a place in the kingdom, especially those of the Abrahamic tradition, as we worship the same God, even if the Jews and Muslims are mistaken about his nature.
 
The Church in her wisdom, states that there is hope for all Non-Catholics that they may see the beatific vision, and attain a place in the kingdom, especially those of the Abrahamic tradition, as we worship the same God, even if the Jews and Muslims are mistaken about his nature.
that goes against what the Bible says about you don’t know the Father unless you know the Son and salvation can only be attained by Jesus and serving him, all else is idol worship
 
that goes against what the Bible says about you don’t know the Father unless you know the Son and salvation can only be attained by Jesus and serving him, all else is idol worship
The Catholic Church WROTE the Bible; they’re not in opposition to each other.

May I suggest you obtain and read the Catechism?
 
The Catholic Church WROTE the Bible; they’re not in opposition to each other.

May I suggest you obtain and read the Catechism?
yes i know the RCC wrote the Bible but still this just seems in opposition, and what this statement is saying is that all people go to Heaven and theres no need to worship Jesus
 
yes i know the RCC wrote the Bible but still this just seems in opposition, and what this statement is saying is that all people go to Heaven and theres no need to worship Jesus
I don’t think that’s what is being said. I think what’s being said is that all who come to the Father come through Christ, but that Christ determines how this happens.

To the OP, may I suggest that, knowing the great faith in our risen Savior that Pope Benedict has, that reagrdless of the direction he faces when he prays, his prays are directed to the Father who is in Heaven. The direction he faces may simply be out of respect for those he is with, and mere geography. Just my take.

Jon
 
I don’t think that’s what is being said. I think what’s being said is that all who come to the Father come through Christ, but that Christ determines how this happens.

To the OP, may I suggest that, knowing the great faith in our risen Savior that Pope Benedict has, that reagrdless of the direction he faces when he prays, his prays are directed to the Father who is in Heaven. The direction he faces may simply be out of respect for those he is with, and mere geography. Just my take.

Jon
but muslims deny Jesus as God which is sin so they cant come to the Father
 
I read he did face Mecca and did remove his shoes in both mosques. Granted, that was in the secular press.

Removing shoes in a mosque is traditional, just as covering the head in a synagogue. For mosques there’s actually a core practical reason - people don’t want to prostrate on floors that people have tracked mud on 😃

Although I understand that the symbolism of “praying toward Mecca” might be alarming to a non-Muslim, it’s actually not “praying towards a Muslim symbol” but rather praying towards the Ka’aba. The Ka’aba (that black square building you see when TV news shows Mecca) contains an altar that according to Muslim tradition was built by Abraham. Muslims face the altar when they pray (regardless of where they are). The city of Mecca is not important - it’s the altar of Abraham.

So you could just as easily say the Pope faced the altar of Abraham when he prayed.

Actually, whether he was facing Jerusalem or facing Mecca, he was facing towards one of the symbols of one of the other great Abrahamic faiths (Judaism or Islam, respectively).
I lived as a kid in Istanbul, and also in Ankara, as my family moved with my step dad’s work. Traditionally, Muslims remove their shoes, and even wash their feet before entering a mosque. There is always a foot washing station outside. If it is a big mosque, then there is a long line of foot washing stations. At the big tourist attraction mosques, such as the Blue Mosque, they give out little paper shoe covers which you may wear instead of removing your shoes.

Iconography is prohibited in mosques. So, I presume that the display of a crucifix might be considered disrespectful of a visitor, though probably tolerated. No Muslim would do such a thing though. One of the sad facts about the Hagia Sofia (the oldest church in the world, though now a museum) is that all of the beautiful gold tile work was covered in plaster when it was made into a mosque. There are small sections that have been restored for view. It must have been magnificent. I forget not how many hundreds of pounds, or perhaps tons of gold went into the decorations. Another notable feature is that stone came from the entire Holy Roman Empire, and one can see a very large variety of stone. Take a flashlight or lantern if you visit to peer into the dark recesses. It is a magnificent structure, whose dome was studied by every succeeding great dome builder.
 
The Pope says it…and so did Vatican II:

“The Church regards with esteem also the Muslims. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth, who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even his inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. (Nostra Aetate 3)”

catholic.com/thisrock/quickquestions/keyword/Islam
This is important.

Islam, as does all religions, contains some truth (some more than others). Any truth contained in Islam, as in any other religion, is Catholic truth.

We should not be afraid to acknowledge the truth and beauty in other religions, as long as it does not cause scandal, as long as we are clear that we are not equating other religions with Catholicism, recommending other religions over Catholicsim, or actually leading people into other religions instead of Catholicsim. I don’t understand what people are so afraid of, why they immediately scream “Heretic!” and start throwing out words like “Polemic” and “Infidel”. No one gets led to the Truth that way. Truth is on our side and so I would think that we should feel comfortable conversing with anyone about any religion. We really need to find common ground and most followers of Islam I have met are not too far away from Catholics from a social morality standpoint. There is much to disagree about but much to agree about.

Now, having said that, some should not pray at a mosque, not only for the reaons of scandal (above) but because they may not be spiritually strong or mature enough. I would not trust my 10 year old at a Baptist Vacation Bible School simply because she does not know better. But I would trust the Holy Father to walk confidently right into any religions ceremony on the planet, if that is what he wanted to do.

What is good for the Holy Father, as the Vicar of Christ protected in a special way by the Holy Spirit, may not be good for us.

-Tim-
 
The Church in her wisdom, states that there is hope for all Non-Catholics that they may see the beatific vision, and attain a place in the kingdom, especially those of the Abrahamic tradition, as we worship the same God, even if the Jews and Muslims are mistaken about his nature.
Jews and muslims might be mistaken if that is how you want to put it, but the teachings in their respective religions flat out denies Jesus as the Christ. Abraham is our father in faith but not a father of a faith (as in a religion as in Judaism, Christianity, islam etc etc ). “Abrahamic tradition,” “Abrahamic religions” they are just plain Syncretist code words, no two ways about it. Yes, the Scriptures mention Abraham, the promise made to him and his faith, but then again it also shows that making a claim to him And do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father,’ for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham. Mathew 3:9
Abraham is important and he has his place in the history of salvation, but he is not more important than Jesus Christ or the Church’s teaching on Jesus Christ, that is where most religions disagree with the Catholic Church. The reason Abraham is brought up and used as a unifying figure is because they reject Jesus Christ.
 
Allah is not an equivalent term for God the Father; Allah simply means “God” in Arabic, would be equivalent to the entire Godhead, the Trinity.

In ancient Judaism, the Triune nature of God was never revealed. Christ never specifically referred to His divine nature as part of “Trinity” within scripture - this was dogmatically proclaimed by the Catholic Church.

Jews and Muslims believe in one monolithic God form. Because most were never part of the Catholic Church, they have no way of knowing that their monolithic Godhead is actually of community of Divine Persons.

**By never being part of the Catholic Church, or even Christianity, through baptism, they NEVER KNEW Jesus Christ, and therefore cannot be guilty of rejecting Him.
**
Muslims worship what in their limited understanding as Non-Christians is a monolithic Godhead. They call Him “Allah”, but so the many Arab Christians, as it just means “God”.

So they don’t reject Jesus Christ as God, they reject an understanding of God’s nature they believe to arisen from error. I can’t really blame them - it literally took an Act of God to introduce the concept of God the Son to humanity!
 
This is important.

Islam, as does all religions, contains some truth (some more than others). Any truth contained in Islam, as in any other religion, is Catholic truth.

. . .]

-Tim-
Yet another excellent post, well-grounded in the Catholic faith.
 
Jews and muslims might be mistaken if that is how you want to put it, but the teachings in their respective religions flat out denies Jesus as the Christ. Abraham is our father in faith but not a father of a faith (as in a religion as in Judaism, Christianity, islam etc etc ). “Abrahamic tradition,” “Abrahamic religions” they are just plain Syncretist code words, no two ways about it. Yes, the Scriptures mention Abraham, the promise made to him and his faith, but then again it also shows that making a claim to him And do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father,’ for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham. Mathew 3:9
Abraham is important and he has his place in the history of salvation, but he is not more important than Jesus Christ or the Church’s teaching on Jesus Christ, that is where most religions disagree with the Catholic Church. The reason Abraham is brought up and used as a unifying figure is because they reject Jesus Christ.
Your preaching to the Choir, I hold that ordinarily there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church, however WE can not even begin to think we know the will of God, may Jews, Muslims etc enter Heaven? If God wills it yes of course they can, I stated what the Church says not my opinion but that of the Holy Church.
 
This is important.

Islam, as does all religions, contains some truth (some more than others). Any truth contained in Islam, as in any other religion, is Catholic truth.

We should not be afraid to acknowledge the truth and beauty in other religions, as long as it does not cause scandal, as long as we are clear that we are not equating other religions with Catholicism, recommending other religions over Catholicsim, or actually leading people into other religions instead of Catholicsim.
There is a distinction to be made between pre-Christian religions like paganism and post-Christian religions like islam. The difference between say pagan religions at the time of the apostles and with islam is that the pagans did not hear of Christ, and their pagan belief system made no comment within it concerning Jesus as the Christ. Even you said as long as it does not cause scandal. Some of the passages in the koran and some of the teaching of islam are scandalous especially concerning the nature of Jesus. (and one should note neo-paganism found in the modern world is a post-Christian belief system.)
 
Yet another excellent post, well-grounded in the Catholic faith.
There is no truth in the non-Christian religions only the Law as written on their hearts this includes Muslims. The Christians only have the Truth. The Catholic Church is trying to be politically correct instead of calling a spade a spade. At least the LC-MS doesn’t allow any joint worship or praying with non-Christians.:signofcross:
 
There is no truth in the non-Christian religions only the Law as written on their hearts this includes Muslims. The Christians only have the Truth. The Catholic Church is trying to be politically correct instead of calling a spade a spade. At least the LC-MS doesn’t allow any joint worship or praying with non-Christians.:signofcross:
With all due respect, the Catholic Church teaches otherwise, and honors truth wherever it is found, even within Lutheranism.
 
There is no truth in the non-Christian religions only the Law as written on their hearts this includes Muslims. The Christians only have the Truth. The Catholic Church is trying to be politically correct instead of calling a spade a spade. At least the LC-MS doesn’t allow any joint worship or praying with non-Christians.:signofcross:
I’ll warn you at the outset that I am going to be blunt.

As Stylites stated, the official teaching of the Magesterium of the Catholic Church is that insofar as every religion, even pagan religions, try to explain creation, the meaning of life, and to discover if there is something more to creation than an accident of physics, they all seek the truth.

The Catholic Church recognizes in other religions that search, among shadows and images, for the God who is unknown yet near since he gives life and breath and all things and wants all men to be saved. Thus, the Church considers all goodness and truth found in these religions as “a preparation for the Gospel and given by him who enlightens all men that they may at length have life.” (CCC 843)

Even Wicca believes that there are incorporeal spiritual beings. Even satanists believe in a higher power. These are truths, and since Christ said “I am the Truth”, these beliefes, at a very rudiemtary level, begin toward the truth of Christ. In light of this teaching, to then state that the Catholic Church is just trying to be politically correct, is to accuse the Church of lying to its members, of intentionally teaching error. And it is here that I would urge extreme caution.

I would not go that far with regards to the Lutheran Church, to claim that Missouri Synod Lutheranism intentionally teaches error to its members. Since I know little about the Lutheran Church, I instead refrain from offering my opinion about what the LC-MS Church is or isn’t trying to be or its motivation behind anything it does. Again, I’ll urge caution with regards to what you accuse the Catholic Church of. I’ll grant that your remark was made out of ignorance about what the Catholic Church teaches as well as zeal for Christ and let it go there.

-Tim-
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top