A
atassina
Guest
It seems that the plagues did not have a direct effect on Pharaoh. Why did he continue with his resistance if he had pain or suffering from the plagues.
He was pitting his Egyptian gods up against the Israelites G-d. His Priests no doubt advised him that there is no way a slave’s G_d would win out against their mighty and numerous Gods.It seems that the plagues did not have a direct effect on Pharaoh. Why did he continue with his resistance if he had pain or suffering from the plagues.
This is exactly true. Each plague was a battle between the God of Abraham and one of the various god’s of the Egyptians.He was pitting his Egyptian gods up against the Israelites G-d. His Priests no doubt advised him that there is no way a slave’s G_d would win out against their mighty and numerous Gods.
Egyptians had several Gods and their own Priests. That’s what made the Israelites of that time different from pretty much everyone around them, they only worshipped one G-d.
It was only after the death of the Pharoah’s first-born and all the Egyptian first-borns that he capitulated and allowed Moses to leave with his people. But his heart was so hardened by the experience that he sent his chariots after them.
Some fresh bread please, since you are near a bakery. I’ll brew tea.Tim,
This is a good post. It helps me to better understand how Pharoah personally suffered. If he didn’t personally suffer he could have taken ten more plagues and then twenty more.
“There is no suffering that a man will not endure if he doesn’t suffer himself.”
What convinced me was the suffering he endured because of the death of his first born. Pharaoh already knew that the true Holy One could prevent him from procreating and thus no family, no descendants no continuing of his reign. Shazam! Brilliant explication.
Thanks, atassina