J
JReducation
Guest
I read a comment on a site called Creative Minority Report. The author of a particular article raised concern because on July 21 the Holy Father said, **“Prayer that doesn’t lead to concrete action toward our brothers is a fruitless and incomplete prayer.” **
I like the way that this particular writer addresses his concern, because it makes it much easier to understand what bothers him; therefore, much easier to clarify his misunderstanding. Before proceeding, I must say that this particular writer is not the only lay traditionalist who misunderstood. From the statements that I’ve read, he explains his concern in the clearest manner.
Misunderstanding is not a crime. We all misunderstand. At times, it’s very difficult to help someone get past a misunderstanding, because they tell you what they misunderstand, but they fail to tell you what they understood. I chose this person, because he does a very good job at explaining what he understood.
He goes on to quote from New Adventon contemplative life.
Without realizing it, he answers his own concern. The Holy Father said that prayer must lead to concrete action toward our brothers. This is true. It is part of the faith of the Church. Otherwise, we just prattle on and on like the pagans.
What is not true is that the Holy Father undermines or diminishes the call to the monastic life in any way. On the contrary. If we examine the theology behind the monastic life, we find that it models the path to the perfection of charity.
Observe what the St. Benedict and other founders of monastic life say and did.
The contemplative, in his investigation of Divine things, is actuated by love for those things, and to increase this love is his ultimate purpose, as well as the firstfruits of his contemplation; in other words the theological virtue of charity is the mainspring as well as the outcome of the act of contemplation.
In monastic houses the concrete expression of charity takes the form of hospitality and education, in the case of the Benedictines. Evangelization in the case of the Poor Clares. That’s how EWTN came into existence. If we look at the Carmelite tradition, there is great emphasis on detachment, fraternal charity, and self-mortification. One just needs to read the writings of Teresa of Avila and Therese of Lisieux The Cistercians, Camaldolese and Trappists follow the Rule of St. Benedict. The Poor Clares also include the perfection of poverty and penance for those who do not do penance into their way of life. These practices are sustained by their life of prayer. The Carthusian embraces the solitude of Christ Crucified for the salvation of the Church, which includes him as well.
We could go on and on. But I don’t think it’s necessary. The point is that the life of prayer must be part of a concrete program that leads to the perfection of charity. One who prays, but does nothing to grow in charity is just prattling.
The Holy Father is not saying that one has to go out and run a school, hospital or an outreach program. Prayer must go hand in hand with some concrete form of charity directed outside of ourselves, be it doing penance for others, being a better spouse, parent or anything else that brings heaven to earth and earth to heaven.
Pope Francis did not undermine the contemplative life at all. On the contrary, he explained that there is a connection between prayer and charity.
I should add that every comment that came from religious communities, monastic, mendicant or apostolic, regarding this statement, has been very positive. The concerns seem to be among a small group of lay people who do not understand the theology of contemplation and who are probably unfamiliar with the rules of Benedict, Augustine, Francis, Albert and Basil. If they were familiar with these, they would have seen that these rules say the same thing that the Holy Father said, obviously in the language of the time when the rule was written.
I like the way that this particular writer addresses his concern, because it makes it much easier to understand what bothers him; therefore, much easier to clarify his misunderstanding. Before proceeding, I must say that this particular writer is not the only lay traditionalist who misunderstood. From the statements that I’ve read, he explains his concern in the clearest manner.
Misunderstanding is not a crime. We all misunderstand. At times, it’s very difficult to help someone get past a misunderstanding, because they tell you what they misunderstand, but they fail to tell you what they understood. I chose this person, because he does a very good job at explaining what he understood.
He goes on to quote from New Adventon contemplative life.
Without realizing it, he answers his own concern. The Holy Father said that prayer must lead to concrete action toward our brothers. This is true. It is part of the faith of the Church. Otherwise, we just prattle on and on like the pagans.
What is not true is that the Holy Father undermines or diminishes the call to the monastic life in any way. On the contrary. If we examine the theology behind the monastic life, we find that it models the path to the perfection of charity.
Observe what the St. Benedict and other founders of monastic life say and did.
The contemplative, in his investigation of Divine things, is actuated by love for those things, and to increase this love is his ultimate purpose, as well as the firstfruits of his contemplation; in other words the theological virtue of charity is the mainspring as well as the outcome of the act of contemplation.
In monastic houses the concrete expression of charity takes the form of hospitality and education, in the case of the Benedictines. Evangelization in the case of the Poor Clares. That’s how EWTN came into existence. If we look at the Carmelite tradition, there is great emphasis on detachment, fraternal charity, and self-mortification. One just needs to read the writings of Teresa of Avila and Therese of Lisieux The Cistercians, Camaldolese and Trappists follow the Rule of St. Benedict. The Poor Clares also include the perfection of poverty and penance for those who do not do penance into their way of life. These practices are sustained by their life of prayer. The Carthusian embraces the solitude of Christ Crucified for the salvation of the Church, which includes him as well.
We could go on and on. But I don’t think it’s necessary. The point is that the life of prayer must be part of a concrete program that leads to the perfection of charity. One who prays, but does nothing to grow in charity is just prattling.
The Holy Father is not saying that one has to go out and run a school, hospital or an outreach program. Prayer must go hand in hand with some concrete form of charity directed outside of ourselves, be it doing penance for others, being a better spouse, parent or anything else that brings heaven to earth and earth to heaven.
Pope Francis did not undermine the contemplative life at all. On the contrary, he explained that there is a connection between prayer and charity.
I should add that every comment that came from religious communities, monastic, mendicant or apostolic, regarding this statement, has been very positive. The concerns seem to be among a small group of lay people who do not understand the theology of contemplation and who are probably unfamiliar with the rules of Benedict, Augustine, Francis, Albert and Basil. If they were familiar with these, they would have seen that these rules say the same thing that the Holy Father said, obviously in the language of the time when the rule was written.