Didache

  • Thread starter Thread starter Filius99993
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

Filius99993

Guest
What is it? I’m not quite sure about all of the Apostolic fathers’ works. How do we distinguish them from apocryphal gnostic junk? And what are those titles, so that I might read them (the ones we accept, that is)?
 
Didache or “Teaching of the Apostles” was written by an unknown author of the 1st century or the turn of the century. Here is a large collection of the Church Fathers litteralchristianlibrary.wetpaint.com/page/Early+Church+Fathers+Collection

There are different classes of extra-Biblical writings. The Apostolic Fathers are men who were contemporaries of the Apostles. Then you have Church Fathers who were pre-council of Nicene, those who lived during that time (325AD), and Post-Nicene. What seperates these Church Fathers from the gnostic junk is that they were Catholic, with a line of succession that goes back to the Apostles.

As for apocryphal writings, some of it is wonderful, while some is not. There are a lot of apocrypha that was written by eye witnesses of Christ and the Apostles but their writings are were not included in the canon of Scripture as inspired, but they do record valueable traditions of the Early Church. Some of the apocryphal writings are just pious legend with not really any historical value to it.

As for the garbage writings such as Gnostic writings, these are writings from sects outside of the Christian Church. These are the writings that the Early Church Fathers battled and defended the Catholic Faith against.
 
In modern scholarship a new consensus is emerging which dates the Didache at about the turn of the 1st century. At the same time, significant similarities between the Didache and the gospel of Matthew have been found as these writings share words, phrases, and motifs. There is also an increasing reluctance of modern scholars to support the thesis that the Didache used Matthew. This close relationship between these two writings might suggest that both documents were created in the same historical and geographical setting. One argument that suggests a common environment is that the community of both the Didache and the gospel of Matthew was probably composed of Judaeo-Christians from the beginning, though each writing shows indications of a congregation which appears to have alienated itself from its Jewish background. Also, the Two Ways teaching (Did. 1-6) may have served as a pre-baptismal instruction within the community of the Didache and Matthew. Furthermore, the correspondence of the Trinitarian baptismal formula in the Didache and Matthew (Did. 7 and Matt 28:19) as well as the similar shape of the Lord’s Prayer (Did. 8 and Matt 6:5-13) apparently reflect the use of resembling oral forms of church traditions. Finally, both the community of the Didache (Did. 11-13) and Matthew (Matt 7:15-23; 10:5-15, 40-42; 24:11,24) were visited by itinerant apostles and prophets, some of whom were illegitimate.[22]
 
** Filius9993**

I read
What is it? I’m not quite sure about all of the Apostolic fathers’ works. How do we distinguish them from apocryphal gnostic junk? And what are those titles, so that I might read them (the ones we accept, that is)?
Would you like to look at the thread:

Episkopos, Presbuteros, Diakonos?

In it the use of these terms in the Apostolic Fathers is discussed.

**
Juliamajor**

Your post is very interesting. However there may not be as much agreement about the Didache as you suggest.

Did Matthew use the Didache or did the Didachist use Matthew? Were Matthew’s gospel and the Didache written in Antioch while Ignatius was bishop? They seem to represent the ideas of different communities.

There are many disputed issues about the Didache.
 
What is it? I’m not quite sure about all of the Apostolic fathers’ works. How do we distinguish them from apocryphal gnostic junk? And what are those titles, so that I might read them (the ones we accept, that is)?
The DIDACHE (in Greek - “Teaching”) was re-discovered in 1873. It was an early catechism that was used for Christian communities in the 1st and 2nd centuries. Although it was considered for the canon, it was rejected. However, the Ethiopian Orthodox Church incorporated it in their deutero-canonicals of the bible. The Catholic Church considers it as part of the body of work by the Apostolic Fathers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top