A
Ana_v
Guest
In the effort of trying to organize my evangelization ideas (for Facebook, for family conversations, what to say to complete strangers, acquaintances, friends, distribution of papers, brochures, etc), instruction in the Catholic faith often comes to mind, and I end of feeling overwhelmed, imagining/fearing that in attempts at evangelizing, I will not say or cover enough information because there is so much to be said of any one doctrine of the faith (let alone morals)! And there are so many doctrines! As Catholics, when we use the term “Gospel” we are referring to the fullness of the Catholic faith. How do we preach the entirety of it?
Now back to the evangelization/catechesis question:
Let me use hypothetical and simple example: You explain to someone that the Trinity is one God, who is a communion of three co-eternal and distinct persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit).
But … there’s more to it than that. There are various terminologies pertinent to this Dogma: essence, nature, substance, hypostasis, generation, begotten, procession, spiration, Logos, Incarnation, etc. Then there are the heresies which consist of false and distorted understandings of the Father, the Son, and Holy Spirit (e.g. Modalism). Now one reading this might wonder, why bring up the heresies when evangelizing – especially to newbies – is this not counterproductive? Well no, the heresies would not be brought up as propositions to be believed, but as examples/clarifications of what the Trinity is NOT.
How does one distinguish between envangelization and catechesis (though I am sure there are some gray areas)?
Now back to the evangelization/catechesis question:
Let me use hypothetical and simple example: You explain to someone that the Trinity is one God, who is a communion of three co-eternal and distinct persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit).
But … there’s more to it than that. There are various terminologies pertinent to this Dogma: essence, nature, substance, hypostasis, generation, begotten, procession, spiration, Logos, Incarnation, etc. Then there are the heresies which consist of false and distorted understandings of the Father, the Son, and Holy Spirit (e.g. Modalism). Now one reading this might wonder, why bring up the heresies when evangelizing – especially to newbies – is this not counterproductive? Well no, the heresies would not be brought up as propositions to be believed, but as examples/clarifications of what the Trinity is NOT.
How does one distinguish between envangelization and catechesis (though I am sure there are some gray areas)?