Having said that, however, I have to ask: if the Bible is the sole source of authority, understandable by all, then why do Baptist ministers need any theological training? And, as someone else has pointed out, how is it that a “Baptist seminary will graduate one preacher as a calvinist and one that is anti calvin and state BOTH are correct and valid theological points”? I read your response to that particular item, but it didn’t seem to me to address the problem of contradicting “truths”. How can truth contradict itself? Do you believe in objective truth? Paul certainly seemed to, and so he was quite firm in correcting errors—he didn’t simply leave it up to God to sort out.
Though the Bible is considered to be the sole source of authority there is a necessary demand that it be treated with care and be approached correctly. As you know, the Bible is a collection of books. There are historical books, poetical books, prophetic books, epistles, books of law, etc. There is alot of information that must be understood. That’s why it is important to have some theological training. Protestant theology comes from interpreting and understanding the basic elements described above.
As for why seminaries do certain things and accept ministers different beliefs I can only guess. I never went to seminary and only know what pastors have told me about it. There are two options for understanding the idea of ministers from the same seminary graduating with different theologies. 1. One of them is a secret “calvinist” or “arminian” or 2. The consensus is that it really doesn’t matter. Truth as has been spoken of so much since visiting this forum is very different for different people. Perception is key here. There is absolute truth - it is found in the person of Christ and His Father and the Holy Spirit.
Of course, everyone claims the truth, but not everyone is right, obviously. I personally believe most truth is relative. Some can understand what God is saying and what is correct - some cannot understand. There can be at least two reasons in my mind. Either sin is in their lives keeping them from seeing the absolute truth or their eyes are kept blind by God’s doing, which again comes back to predestination and election.
If I were the person in charge, I would see no problem with graduating a calvinist or arminian from the same school. Their views are respected for what they are and would be given the freedom to accept either view. Both schools of thought have valid points. This may seem ridiculous and chaotic, but it really isn’t. A good example is the way our American government works. There’s a democratic and republican party. Each have valid points in different areas. It really takes each one to balance the other out. Our government may seem chaotic and slow, but it works. The same can be said for the protestant faith. Hopefully I didn’t muddy the waters more.
God bless…