Differences between Catholic faith and Baptist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Carole
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Carole:
My daughter is considering being Baptist. When asked why, she describes their wide range of children’s programs, a large and beautiful building, and social contacts. I have encouraged her to thoroughly research the faith first. Can someone help me to accuately describe for her how Catholic is different from Baptist?
I’ve asked countless Protestants over the years how they came to choose their denomination. Not once, ever, has anyone ever said “because it’s the truth”. The reasons are always, always external, just as your daughter described. None of those external things matter of you don’t have objective truth. Hopefully she’ll come to realize that one day.

In Christ,
Nancy 🙂
 
40.png
MartyL:
Perhaps you should get out more?😉
It’s been my experience that those who leave the Church either have no idea what they left and so are easily convinced that the Church teaches things that she doesn’t OR the Church’s high moral standard cramps their style, disallowing them to do something they want. For example, my sister left the Church because she wanted to marry a divorced man. She said the priest “wouldn’t” marry them, not realizing that he couldn’t marry them.
There are lots of them, and they go Protestant because of basic problems that they see in Catholic rules, doctrine and structure:
  • Undemocratic organization
  • The NT church wasn’t democratic. The Catholic Church is run is exactly the same manner as we see it run in Acts 15.
Uninspiring ceremonies (e.g., one of my children’s baptizing priest seemed disappointed that he couldn’t make the 1:00 NFL kickoff rather than overjoyed at a new Christian)-
This is an individual matter not a Catholic matter. The behavior of individuals within the Church does not effect the truth that is taught.
The unfathomable scandals compounded by cover-ups-
Again, a matter of the behavior of individuals within the Church that does not effect the truth that is taught.
General questioning of the assertion of infallibility-
Catholics claim nothing for the pope that individual Protestants don’t claim for themselves.
Women’s roles in the church
  • Women can do everything in the Church but be ordained.
They find God’s love and presence in the particular Protestant congregation.-
something that is absolutely present in the Catholic Church as well. Unfortunately, many Protestants limit the presence of God to what they can personally feel at any given moment.

In Christ,
Nancy 🙂
 
40.png
Lida:
I, too, once attended a Baptist small group, in which a returned missionary came to talk about his experiences in West Africa. He talked about how most of the people in Cote d’Ivoire were Muslim, but he had managed to bring a few of them to Christ.

Then, apparently wanting to include his young children in his talk, he sat his three-year-old daughter on his lap and said, “Do you remember Miss X? Was Miss X a Christian?”

The little girl shook her head no.

“That’s right! Miss X was a Catholic!”

Ouch.
Wow! That’s really sad!
 
Ahimsaman,

You wrote: “Obviously, folks, there are bad apples everywhere. They are present in Baptist churches and in Catholic ones. Just last night watching the presidential debates I know millions of Catholics were cringing when John Kerry claimed he was born and raised a Catholic when the issue of abortion came up. Perfect example. Stray sheep in the fold.”

Yes, very true, but there is a big difference: there are stray sheep within Catholicism (Kerry being a text-book case of “Catholic-in-name-only”), but because there IS a standard, so to speak, they can be seen as such. Ditto for dissident clergy: I’m sure you can find dissident priests, but their teaching can be compared to the teaching of the Church and seen for what it is. This cannot be said of those Baptists (and others) out there that preach that Catholics aren’t Christian—who is to say that they are wrong? When I spoke of the Baptist who told me I was going to hell (about 15 posts ago), I forgot to mention a very important item: this guy is a Baptist MINISTER, serving in Alaska, ministering to the Eskimos. Here’s a quote from one of his posts to me (his spelling and punctuation, not mine): “The Catholic church hunted down like dogs , baptists and burned them at the stake, took red hot pinchers and took chunks of flesh out til they expired , chopped off their heads and did this in the millions for around 12 hundred years we call the dark ages for standing for the truth of baptism and not accepting baptismal regeneration.” And another: “When you end up in hell, you wont’ be cussin me any longer but you will be like the rich man in hell crying out for someone to take the Gospel to your familys !!! Your hate for me will change, you will realize you cannot get out and that fact is the toughest thing I know to deal with.” I should point out that I was not nasty to this guy whatsoever up to this point, but very in a very level and matter-of-fact manner pointed out his misconceptions of Catholicism. Yet he accuses me of having hate. This guy is spreading this garbage to the Eskimos in Alaska, and there is no Protestant authority who can say, “This guy does not represent Baptist teaching”, because there are so many different kinds of Baptists and they’re independent. I don’t think this guy is that unusual, whereas I have never met a Catholic who thought that non-Catholics weren’t Christians. A few loony types might show up here (this is the Internet, after all), but a quick look at the Catechism shows that they are not in keeping with Church teaching.
 
40.png
Ozzie:
Thank you. I certainly do commend you for actually looking (and thinking) before jumping. Most leap without thinking and then simply conform. But let me ask you one more question, what is it that initially attracted you to Catholicism to even consider conversion?
To be honest, the biggest thing was sacramental graces. To be able to meet Christ on a physical level instead of just a spiritual level was appealing to me.

Yes, if I was going to convert I wanted to be 100% committed and ready to die for that faith before joining. I felt it would be disgraceful to convert without submitting to the church authority and teachings. I still leave the door open for the future.

Thanks for asking.

God bless…
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
Yes, if I was going to convert I wanted to be 100% committed and ready to die for that faith before joining. I felt** it would be disgraceful to convert without submitting to the church authority and teachings.**
God bless…
ahimsaman72: ALL of us converts are like that. That’s why we drive the tepid pew-warmers and cafeteria Catholics nuts! I sat outside the gate for 3 decades until I finally realized that I was living a lie by not making the public declaration. The point is different for each of us.

Bartender! another double iced espresso for ahimsaman72! On me.
 
40.png
Sherlock:
Ahimsaman,

You wrote: “Obviously, folks, there are bad apples everywhere. They are present in Baptist churches and in Catholic ones. Just last night watching the presidential debates I know millions of Catholics were cringing when John Kerry claimed he was born and raised a Catholic when the issue of abortion came up. Perfect example. Stray sheep in the fold.”

Yes, very true, but there is a big difference: there are stray sheep within Catholicism (Kerry being a text-book case of “Catholic-in-name-only”), but because there IS a standard, so to speak, they can be seen as such. Ditto for dissident clergy: I’m sure you can find dissident priests, but their teaching can be compared to the teaching of the Church and seen for what it is. This cannot be said of those Baptists (and others) out there that preach that Catholics aren’t Christian—who is to say that they are wrong? When I spoke of the Baptist who told me I was going to hell (about 15 posts ago), I forgot to mention a very important item: this guy is a Baptist MINISTER, serving in Alaska, ministering to the Eskimos. Here’s a quote from one of his posts to me (his spelling and punctuation, not mine): “The Catholic church hunted down like dogs , baptists and burned them at the stake, took red hot pinchers and took chunks of flesh out til they expired , chopped off their heads and did this in the millions for around 12 hundred years we call the dark ages for standing for the truth of baptism and not accepting baptismal regeneration.” And another: “When you end up in hell, you wont’ be cussin me any longer but you will be like the rich man in hell crying out for someone to take the Gospel to your familys !!! Your hate for me will change, you will realize you cannot get out and that fact is the toughest thing I know to deal with.” I should point out that I was not nasty to this guy whatsoever up to this point, but very in a very level and matter-of-fact manner pointed out his misconceptions of Catholicism. Yet he accuses me of having hate. This guy is spreading this garbage to the Eskimos in Alaska, and there is no Protestant authority who can say, “This guy does not represent Baptist teaching”, because there are so many different kinds of Baptists and they’re independent. I don’t think this guy is that unusual, whereas I have never met a Catholic who thought that non-Catholics weren’t Christians. A few loony types might show up here (this is the Internet, after all), but a quick look at the Catechism shows that they are not in keeping with Church teaching.
First, there is an authority that can say this person is wrong. It’s the Holy Bible. This person doesn’t know the meaning of Biblical love and has forsaken Christ’s command to love even his enemy.

Second, he is obviously closed-minded. He cannot see the harm he is doing. He thinks he is doing God a favor. He’s plain wrong.

Third, the standard is the same for the Catholic and non-Catholic. Love is imperative - not an option. This person is not following the Christ revealed in the Bible.
 
40.png
mercygate:
ahimsaman72: ALL of us converts are like that. That’s why we drive the tepid pew-warmers and cafeteria Catholics nuts! I sat outside the gate for 3 decades until I finally realized that I was living a lie by not making the public declaration. The point is different for each of us.

Bartender! another double iced espresso for ahimsaman72! On me.
Oh, boy, I needed that! 😃
Thanks!!
 
40.png
Carole:
My daughter is considering being Baptist.
Baptists are Christian too and we, as Catholic Christians, should allways look for the truth in the Baptists theologies (plural!). We should also look at the similarities between Christs Church and the schismatic churches like the Baptisits. Concentrate on the good when you can
When asked why, she describes their wide range of children’s programs, a large and beautiful building, and social contacts.
Did Jesus found a chidrens program or preach a verbal Gospel? Did Jesus preach from large beutifull buildings or from street corners? Did Jesus wear gold Jewelry and live in mansions? Did Jesus say follow whichever religion has the best social activities and parties? Did Jesus promise us a rose garden and party? Did Jesus say being a Christian would be wearing nice clothes and having 3 meals a day and haveing nothing but great times? The Mormons and Jehovah Witnesses both have great family values and kids programs and social events too! Why not these two Christian sects too? Their more “fun” then the ever changing Baptist faith.
I have encouraged her to thoroughly research the faith first.
Ask her to study from OT times to modern in that order. Study what the Jews believed and were Scripture came from. Study the early Church and what they believed. Study the “dark” ages and the inquisition using Catholic and protestant sources. Tell her to study Luther and what he believed and how it changed and when and why. Ask Her to study the Baptist faith starting with the “RE”-Baptizers (ANA-Baptists) through todays “RE”-Baptizers(Baptists). Ask her why the Baptists continually change their faith and morals. Ask her if “RE”-baptism is an abomination unto God? Ask her why there are at least 3 Baptist churches with active and practicing homosexual preachers. Ask her why Baptist ministers in one church don’t substitute for a vacationing preacher in another church down the street? Ask her why a Baptist seminary will graduate one preacher as a calvinist and one that is anti calvin and state BOTH are correct and valid theological points? Is there ANY truth that Baptists can stick to? What are the 5 or 6 truths Baptists mostly agree on?
Can someone help me to accuately describe for her how Catholic is different from Baptist?
Here is a good site too
members.aol.com/uticacw/baptist/bibletruth.html

Site for numerous links:

catholicculture.org/

Allways talk to her with “LOVE”. Ask her:

How many churches did Jesus establish?
Did Jesus preach to be schismatic?
Did Jesus preach to break-off and start a new church whenever you felt like it or to stay loyal?
Do the Baptists still preach and believe what the early church taught? (The Bible not yet written, remember? Don’t use Scripture here.)
Do you have to have a Bible to be “saved”? Where is that in a Bible?
Who wrote the Bible? How many books? When? Who declared it inspired? Is it a tool of the Church or is it the “only” word of God? Is the Bible the pillar of truth or Christs Church? Is the Book of Mormon or Koran inspired? Why or why not? Which version of the Bible is the best? Are all versions the same? (JW version, Joe Smith version, etc…) Why did the AKJV have ALL the books of Scripture and the KJV delete them out in the 1800’s?
Do Baptists interpret the Bible literally or the Catholics?
Why do the Baptists “add” things to Scripture like ‘believers’ baptism which is nowhere in the Bible and is only found if you add the concept to Scripture?
If your ancestors 700 years ago were Christian which Church were they in?
Why do Baptists accept “Buffet Line” theology when Jesus did not?

I used to go to Baptists churches for 27 adult years and finally discovered the truth. Now I’m Catholic. How many truths did Jesus preach?
 
40.png
Malachi4U:
Baptists are Christian too and we, as Catholic Christians, should allways look for the truth in the Baptists theologies (plural!).
Truth is really a difficult concept for us humans. Truth is to be found in many places, wherever God is. Truth has always been truth - our perception of it is the key to understanding.
Ask her if “RE”-baptism is an abomination unto God? Ask her why there are at least 3 Baptist churches with active and practicing homosexual preachers. Ask her why Baptist ministers in one church don’t substitute for a vacationing preacher in another church down the street? Ask her why a Baptist seminary will graduate one preacher as a calvinist and one that is anti calvin and state BOTH are correct and valid theological points? Is there ANY truth that Baptists can stick to? What are the 5 or 6 truths Baptists mostly agree on?
I’m unclear about your “re-baptism” concept. Can you explain briefly? I would like to know. I know your story about Baptist ministers and vacationing preachers from a previous post.

From my 30+ years of being Baptist, there have not been many times a pastor of mine has taken a vacation. When he has taken one usually the associate pastor gives the messages from the pulpit. This is not irregular, nor should it be. It gives the congregation a bit of fresh air to hear the associate pastor give sermons.

You don’t want to go to the homosexual issue, do you? There are more than three priests right now who are practicing homosexuals and giving communion bread in the catholic church, so why do you bring something like this up? Beware of hypocrisy.

There are different seminaries in the country. There are denominational seminaries, obviously. Each one is unique with either conservative or liberal professors. Ministers are graduated as intelligent persons who are allowed freedom in theological areas. However, Baptist practice is very similar and the pastor’s role in the church is always the same - that of local shepherd. I think you would agree that congregations are much less concerned with deep theology and more concerned with living holy, Christian lives.

5 or 6 commonly held views of Baptists would be:
  1. the virgin birth of Christ, 2. divinity of Christ, 3. resurrection of Christ, 4. congregational form of church government, 5. the Bible as the inspired word of God
Do you have to have a Bible to be “saved”? Where is that in a Bible?
I think all would agree, both Baptists and Catholics that God saves people. He elects them to salvation. People don’t save themselves.
Do Baptists interpret the Bible literally or the Catholics?
Why do the Baptists “add” things to Scripture like ‘believers’ baptism which is nowhere in the Bible and is only found if you add the concept to Scripture?
If your ancestors 700 years ago were Christian which Church were they in?
Why do Baptists accept “Buffet Line” theology when Jesus did not?

I used to go to Baptists churches for 27 adult years and finally discovered the truth. Now I’m Catholic. How many truths did Jesus preach?
I believe Baptists and Catholics interpret the Bible literally at times and figuratively at times. So, what’s the point?

Water baptism after belief is present in many verses in the NT.

Jesus accepted people for who they were. For the repentant, he was compassionate and forgiving. For the wicked, he was condemning and harsh. Jesus Christ wasn’t nearly as interested in theology as you, my friend. He wasn’t a theologian. He was the life-giver, Son of God and Saviour. He was many things to many people. I’m afraid theology is more important to you than the risen Christ. Beware that your faith is in the right place and person. I admonish you to re-think what you have said here.
 
Ahimsaman,

You wrote: “First, there is an authority that can say this person is wrong. It’s the Holy Bible. This person doesn’t know the meaning of Biblical love and has forsaken Christ’s command to love even his enemy.”

I appreciate that you are not like this person, and do see that we are to preach the truth in love—thank you! However, here’s the problem: this guy uses the Bible as his authority, and his attitudes are derived from it (if I take him at his word, which I do). Here’s some more samples of his “preaching” to me—note the use of Scripture(again, his spelling and punctuation and use of caps, not mine):

“May I take a stand here to let you know I am an unafilated baptist. Independent if you please of man made organizations , hierarchys of men and etc… I believe with out a doubt that Christ built a baptist church in this way . Baptist teach preach and practice the New Testament patterns and doctrines. This ain’t good two shoes junk or me being better or some ! lame something like that. I can’t speak for religions that are man made or was propagated from a man made organization. In Matt 28:18-20 you will not find that we have the authority to LEGISLATE DOCTRINE, WE CANNOT ADD TO OR TAKE AWAY as is so evident in the Catholic church. The power given to us was EXECUTIVE , TO CARRY OUT WHAT CHRIST SAID. Its all in the scriptures man , the Lord is the law giver , we carry it out. Acts 1:8 “But ye shall rec! ieve power , after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you : and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea , and in Samaria, and unto the unttermost part of the earth.” I am here by the call of God to preach the gospel to the eskimo people. They have been duped in religion and have no hope. I simply can’t change the doctrines just because of circumstance !! The reason they are duped is because people centuries ago changed doctrines The legislated new doctrines , HEY, its been ongoing for centuries but those that change are false in their beliefs and will face the wrath of Almighty God , Revelation 22:18 FOR I TESTIFY UNTO EVERY MAN THAT HEARETH THE WORDS OF THE PROPHECY OF THIS BOOK, IF ANY MAN SHALL ADD SHALL ADD UNTO THESE THINGS, GOD SHALL ADD UNTO HIM THE PLAGUES THAT ARE WRITTEN IN THIS BOOK;
vs 19. AND IF ANY MAN SHALL TAKE AWAY FROM THE WORDS OF THE BOOK OF THIS PROPHECY, GOD SHALL TAKE AWAY HIS PART OUT OF THE BOOK OF LIFE, AND OUT OF THE HOLY CITY, AND FROM THE THINGS WHICH ARE WRITTEN IN THIS BOOK”."

So, you say that the Bible is the authority that shows this person is wrong—well, he uses the Bible to show that he is right, and is spreading this hate in his missionary work in Alaska. If he were a Catholic priest saying this kind of garbage about non-Catholics, he could (and hopefully would) be reprimanded, educated, or removed—whatever it would take—and thus would not be in a position of spreading a hateful and false Gospel. My point is that there is NO authority who is going to stop this Baptist minister.
 
40.png
Sherlock:
Ahimsaman,

You wrote: “First, there is an authority that can say this person is wrong. It’s the Holy Bible. This person doesn’t know the meaning of Biblical love and has forsaken Christ’s command to love even his enemy.”

I appreciate that you are not like this person, and do see that we are to preach the truth in love—thank you! However, here’s the problem: this guy uses the Bible as his authority, and his attitudes are derived from it (if I take him at his word, which I do). Here’s some more samples of his “preaching” to me—note the use of Scripture(again, his spelling and punctuation and use of caps, not mine):

So, you say that the Bible is the authority that shows this person is wrong—well, he uses the Bible to show that he is right, and is spreading this hate in his missionary work in Alaska. If he were a Catholic priest saying this kind of garbage about non-Catholics, he could (and hopefully would) be reprimanded, educated, or removed—whatever it would take—and thus would not be in a position of spreading a hateful and false Gospel. My point is that there is NO authority who is going to stop this Baptist minister.
I understand your position and can identify with it. Even in the early church in Acts of the Apostles it is apparent very early on that some people distorted Christ’s teachings and taught false gospels, (which Paul mentioned in his epistles). Unfortunately, this person is blinded by his supposed knowledge. And reading what you posted here shows me that he doesn’t speak clearly and lacks some basic english and grammar skills.

ALOT of so-called ministers are actually very uneducated. They have no theological training. There’s not much we can do about this wayward minister but to pray that God will take care of it. Usually, though, missionaries are supported by individuals and/or organizations. If he is preaching a false gospel, those supporting him financially need to know this. They can cut off his funding and he would have to go it alone - something most cannot do.

I don’t agree that there has to be an authority to stop his spread of hate. I personally believe God works all things according to His will. Somehow, some way, God is directing this situation and will use this to His glory. I believe in predestination and election of believers and therefore see that God can still work miracles and save those whom are His. My will would be that he be stopped immediately. God’s will must triumph though. I think you would agree that this man will be judged and suffer for his treason. Remember the apostle Paul? When the Lord appeared to Ananias and told him about Paul he mentioned that Paul would suffer much because of his previous way of life. Could be the same deal here.

God bless…
 
40.png
mercygate:
The young woman in question is not contemplating going to the Baptist Church because of anything doctrinal (which shows she is uncatechized) but because it has better programs – and who can deny that a lot of Baptist churches do a REALLY great job of meeting the social/family needs of their people?
Great points.

It also can be very sad when one understands and believes a faith, but chooses to sidestep their beliefs about how to worship God because another faith has the social “programs” they like.

These decisions are usually driven by the desire to socialize their children in a large group. What an awful message to send your kids.
 
Ahimsaman,

First, let me thank you for your charitable and thoughtful responses to the questions I’ve posed. I appreciate being able to discuss differences without the discussion degenerating into hostility.

You wrote: “I understand your position and can identify with it. Even in the early church in Acts of the Apostles it is apparent very early on that some people distorted Christ’s teachings and taught false gospels, (which Paul mentioned in his epistles).”

Yes, you are right in pointing out that this problem has been there from the first. I think it is interesting to note how Paul, for example, deals with the spread of false gospels— for example, he sends Timothy to deal with the situation, with authority: “As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus that you may charge certain persons not to teach any different doctrine, nor to occupy themselves with myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculations rather than the divine training that is in faith…” and later, “This charge I commit to you, Timothy, my son, in accordance with the prophetic utterances which pointed to you, that inspired by them you may wage the good warfare, holding faith and a good conscience.” And later, “Command and teach these things.” In other words, there IS a correct doctrine, and Paul knows what it is. He does NOT send Timothy to dialogue and perhaps vote on what the truth is, he sends him with authority. This runs counter to what you suggest, “I don’t agree that there has to be an authority to stop his spread of hate.” Nor does Paul shrug his shoulders and trust everything to Divine Providence, as you do by saying, “I personally believe God works all things according to His will. Somehow, some way, God is directing this situation and will use this to His glory.” Paul takes a definite stand, with authority.
 
Steven Ray is convert from the Baptist faith, I would look at his web site and check out his books for help.
www.catholic-convert.com
As far as Baptists believing Catholics can be saved that depends on the pastor and the particular church. I have worked with a fundementalist baptist for over ten years. We have had many lengthy discusions on faith. After a couple a years he told me I believe you are saved. I asked is that because of the Catholic church or despite it. He just smiled and wouldn’t answer. (He admitted most in Church would say no on a seperate occasion.)
I also have a friend who came from a Baptist church whose now in a non-denom church and her previous church had more of a non-denom attitude. Unlike the Catholic church there is no set doctrine of faith.
As far as the Baptists being connected to Anabaptists, I researched this (after it was brought up by my co-worker) and found no substantial evidence to support this. Anabaptists have very different views from Baptists (more like Amish) and I could not find a cohesive thread.
 
Ahimsaman,

I was short of time when I wrote my last response, and so I would like to continue with some further comments regarding your last post.

You wrote: “And reading what you posted here shows me that he doesn’t speak clearly and lacks some basic english and grammar skills.”

Yes, that’s my impression as well. As I recall from other posts, he is originally from Tennessee or Arkansas—I can’t remember which—and sometimes does sound like the stereotypical coon-huntin’, possum eatin’, backward rube that atheists and others like to pretend make up the bulk of believers. There is no doubting his enthusiasm, though…I gotta hand it to him there.

You wrote: “ALOT of so-called ministers are actually very uneducated. They have no theological training.”

Although Catholic seminaries are better now than they were in the 70s and 80s (when dissent was more widespread), one can still come across priests who have had shaky and sometimes shady formation. They have had theological training, but sometimes from dissident theologians! I am very pleased to see that the younger Catholic priests are much more orthodox than their older fellow priests—it gives me great hope. So, I’m hardly going to jump on the lack of training that you point to here, and will merely pray that the situation improves for Baptists.

Having said that, however, I have to ask: if the Bible is the sole source of authority, understandable by all, then why do Baptist ministers need any theological training? And, as someone else has pointed out, how is it that a “Baptist seminary will graduate one preacher as a calvinist and one that is anti calvin and state BOTH are correct and valid theological points”? I read your response to that particular item, but it didn’t seem to me to address the problem of contradicting “truths”. How can truth contradict itself? Do you believe in objective truth? Paul certainly seemed to, and so he was quite firm in correcting errors—he didn’t simply leave it up to God to sort out.

You wrote: “There’s not much we can do about this wayward minister but to pray that God will take care of it. Usually, though, missionaries are supported by individuals and/or organizations. If he is preaching a false gospel, those supporting him financially need to know this. They can cut off his funding and he would have to go it alone - something most cannot do.”

Yes, I do pray for this minister, and have since I had this exchange with him in May. I agree that it is about all that one can do in this situation. Regarding his support by individuals and/or organizations: sure, it would be great to think that they would be appalled at the sort of gospel that he’s preaching to the Eskimos, but there’s no assurance of that. They might very well agree with his assessments of those horrid Catholics, and support his views 100%. (I should mention that he also is against the doctrines of Lutherans, but for some reason he has a particular animus towards the Catholic Church.) This is where the lack of authority is shown to be a great weakness—who are you, or anyone, to say he’s wrong, since he is using the Bible as his authority, just as you are? Again, a Catholic priest who taught such nonsense about non-Catholics could (and hopefully would) be educated, reprimanded, or removed—whatever it took—by the bishop, much as Timothy commanded others, by the authority given him by Paul, to stop teaching false doctrine.

You wrote: “I think you would agree that this man will be judged and suffer for his treason.”

He will be judged, yes, as we all will. I pray that he will see the error of his ways soon—who knows? Maybe he’ll convert to Catholicism, and his genuine enthusiam used to correct the misconceptions of other anti-Catholics. Now that would be something to see!

God Bless.
 
40.png
Sherlock:
Ahimsaman,

First, let me thank you for your charitable and thoughtful responses to the questions I’ve posed. I appreciate being able to discuss differences without the discussion degenerating into hostility.

Yes, you are right in pointing out that this problem has been there from the first. I think it is interesting to note how Paul, for example, deals with the spread of false gospels— for example, he sends Timothy to deal with the situation, with authority: “As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus that you may charge certain persons not to teach any different doctrine, nor to occupy themselves with myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculations rather than the divine training that is in faith…” and later, “This charge I commit to you, Timothy, my son, in accordance with the prophetic utterances which pointed to you, that inspired by them you may wage the good warfare, holding faith and a good conscience.” And later, “Command and teach these things.” In other words, there IS a correct doctrine, and Paul knows what it is. He does NOT send Timothy to dialogue and perhaps vote on what the truth is, he sends him with authority. This runs counter to what you suggest, “I don’t agree that there has to be an authority to stop his spread of hate.” Nor does Paul shrug his shoulders and trust everything to Divine Providence, as you do by saying, “I personally believe God works all things according to His will. Somehow, some way, God is directing this situation and will use this to His glory.” Paul takes a definite stand, with authority.
First, Sherlock, I also must thank you for your thoughtful and kind responses also. I have quite enjoyed and appreciated your posts.

Paul was very zealous for his new faith and was explicit in his writings that his gospel was the true one and all others were false. I agree there. I also agree that Paul charges Timothy with the task of correcting those spreading false gospels. From my vantage point, Timothy was a pastor and teacher - giving him “authority” to correct those dissenters. Local pastors of church members have that same authority. Also, I believe laypersons have a responsibility to counter those who are spreading false teachings.

Above all, we cannot physically force someone to stop doing something. In this person’s case or in a dissenting priests case - you can excommunicate them or fire them, but that doesn’t stop them from leaving the “church” or organization and going off on their own. That’s obviously where God steps in. I believe we should do all we can and whatever is left is executable by God. I didn’t mean to imply that we do nothing to counteract such terrible behavior.

Just remember, even in congregational government like the Baptists have, there are authoritative measures in every local congregation. Pastors, elders and deacons have specific mandates written into the bylaws of the church. They may excommunicate and rebuke those in error and are given the responsibility to teach correct and Biblical doctrine. Of course this form of government is different in alot of respects than the Catholic church, but nonetheless is effective.

Without knowing this wayward minister’s credentials and church affiliation (if he has any) it’s impossible to know where the problem lies. In the end, both you and I agree that he is wrong and lacking in the Biblical love that we are reminded of so many times in Scripture. Romans 13:8 is very clear about the mandate to love. Here it is: “Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.” This wayward minister has not fulfilled the law and will have to answer to his Maker - as I will and you also.

God bless.
 
40.png
Sherlock:
Having said that, however, I have to ask: if the Bible is the sole source of authority, understandable by all, then why do Baptist ministers need any theological training? And, as someone else has pointed out, how is it that a “Baptist seminary will graduate one preacher as a calvinist and one that is anti calvin and state BOTH are correct and valid theological points”? I read your response to that particular item, but it didn’t seem to me to address the problem of contradicting “truths”. How can truth contradict itself? Do you believe in objective truth? Paul certainly seemed to, and so he was quite firm in correcting errors—he didn’t simply leave it up to God to sort out.
Though the Bible is considered to be the sole source of authority there is a necessary demand that it be treated with care and be approached correctly. As you know, the Bible is a collection of books. There are historical books, poetical books, prophetic books, epistles, books of law, etc. There is alot of information that must be understood. That’s why it is important to have some theological training. Protestant theology comes from interpreting and understanding the basic elements described above.

As for why seminaries do certain things and accept ministers different beliefs I can only guess. I never went to seminary and only know what pastors have told me about it. There are two options for understanding the idea of ministers from the same seminary graduating with different theologies. 1. One of them is a secret “calvinist” or “arminian” or 2. The consensus is that it really doesn’t matter. Truth as has been spoken of so much since visiting this forum is very different for different people. Perception is key here. There is absolute truth - it is found in the person of Christ and His Father and the Holy Spirit.

Of course, everyone claims the truth, but not everyone is right, obviously. I personally believe most truth is relative. Some can understand what God is saying and what is correct - some cannot understand. There can be at least two reasons in my mind. Either sin is in their lives keeping them from seeing the absolute truth or their eyes are kept blind by God’s doing, which again comes back to predestination and election.

If I were the person in charge, I would see no problem with graduating a calvinist or arminian from the same school. Their views are respected for what they are and would be given the freedom to accept either view. Both schools of thought have valid points. This may seem ridiculous and chaotic, but it really isn’t. A good example is the way our American government works. There’s a democratic and republican party. Each have valid points in different areas. It really takes each one to balance the other out. Our government may seem chaotic and slow, but it works. The same can be said for the protestant faith. Hopefully I didn’t muddy the waters more. 🙂

God bless…
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
…The Baptist denomination didn’t really begin till 1607 officially.
That’s correct, however I know of Baptists that state they were the origional church founded by Jesus and that ALL other churches broke off from them and are thus non-apostolic! My daughter was even taught this in the AWANA program (which she is still in by the way).
It is incorrect to say that Baptists deleted books out of Scripture.
The Baptist do not have the authority from God to delete books of Scripture, however they use the abridged versions of the Bible that the English publishers made in the 1800’s (i.e. KJV). It was the British publishers and men like Luther that delted 7-11+ books from Scripture. The Baptists just accept the 66 book version of the British publishing houses from the 1800’s. A note here, the origional Baptists hated the Kings version of Scripture since it was a political version by a practicing homosexual king. The Baptists used the Geneva Bible origionally from what I’ve seen.
It is also incorrect to say that the Baptists changed the early church. I don’t understand - have any examples?
Baptists did not exist in the early Church so they could not have changed it. What they did was to change away from the teachings of the early Church on issues like birth control, marriage, baptism, etc…
…As for the rest of your post - it is similarly ridiculous and without examples it is impossible for your post to make sense.
Try reading the NT. It is full of examples to be of one mind, one body, one Church, to remain loyal and to avoid schism.

Just one example as you say:

Jn 17:11 “Holy Father, keep them in your name that you have given me, so that they may be one just as we are.” (NAB)
Basically condescending garbage.
I forgive you for your rude comment as I follow Gods word. I try to write with Love as Jesus taught. (Read 1 Cor 13 for examples of “Love”.) But I can see you cannot yet see through the condridicting Baptist theologie(s). I will pray for you to see and hopefully others here will help to point out flaws in Baptist theologie(s). Grouping all Baptist into one group is like saying all fish in the ocean are alike.

The post you quoted me from was a post to Carol and not you so that Carole could seek the answers to my questions. I can see that you too need to seek them. It was meant so that she could research and find the answers. I did not state examples so that the search could be made free from conclusions in an honest manner. I hope you can understand how I wanted her to study honestly for an honest answer without a closed mind. Hopefully you will learn from this the different styles of writting used on this forum.

I am glad you’re here and hope to read more of your posts as I find them very entertaining.

Gods peace be with you.
 
According to Baptists, Scripture is “the supreme standard by which all human conduct, creeds, and religious opinions should be tried” (e.g., the Southern Baptist “Faith and Message,” June 14, 2000). The General Association of Regular Baptists concurs that “We believe in the authority and sufficiency of the Holy Bible” (GARBC Articles of Faith), and then goes on to effuse that:

*“The Bible is the final authority in all matters of belief and practice because the Bible is inspired by God and bears the absolute authority of God Himself. Whatever the Bible affirms, Baptists accept as true. No human opinion or decree of any church group can override the Bible. Even creeds and confessions of faith, which attempt to articulate the theology of Scripture, do not carry Scripture’s inherent authority” *(GARBC “Baptist Distinctives”).

The Bible is indeed the inspired and infallible word of God. But the Bible neither makes the claim that Holy Scripture is sufficient nor that it is the supreme standard in deciding religious matters. 👋
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top