J
javelin35
Guest
One area that I am convinced of is that Sola Scriptura, if it was meant to be promulgated by the apostles, had not been adequately set forth in scripture. All we have are a few references that seem to indicate that the apostles might have intended for scripture to become the sole authority. But considering the leeway that some passages allow for, and the leeway that protestant scholars assign to other similarly worded passages regarding other doctrines, I see no basis to come away with sola scriptura from any bible verses or combination of verses. In fact, I see apostolic authority being passed on to others in a much clearer sense than being passed on to scripture. It is still possible that I am unaware of some hidden key to all of this, but given the time and energy that I have put into understanding this, and the many reasons I had for not becoming Catholic (let the reader understand) I definitely had a vested interest in finding out what these hidden support for sola scriptura were. It seems to me that people hang tenously to sola scriptura, not because they see any support for it, but rather because their understanding of apostolic authority stems primarily from heavy-handed popes and bishops in years past. Putting it all into perspective, apostolic tradition or teaching as handed down over the centuries has kept Christianity remarkably well on course; it is only in the last 500 years that we have seen any significant departure from Orthodox Christianity and this is far and way primarily due to the Protestant theology. Nevertheless we are co-combatants in the Church militant here and now and we have much to gain our alliance as Christians working for values we have in common.
Even though Baptists believe in sola scriptura there is much we can accomplish with them before Jesus comes again.
Even though Baptists believe in sola scriptura there is much we can accomplish with them before Jesus comes again.
