Different translations of the bible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sir_Knight
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Sir_Knight

Guest
How many Catholic-approved English translations of the bible are there and what are they?

Thanks in advance.

PS: Oh, if anyone has any online links to them, that would be appreciated as well.
 
I don’t know the links, but here are the translations that I know of:
Douay-Rheims
New American Bible
Revised Standard Version (CE/2CE)
New Revised Standard Version CE
Jerusalem Bible
New Jerusalem Bible
Christian Community Bible
Good News Bible
Confraternity (NT only)
Knox (NT only)
 
That’s most of them.

Revised English Bible is a nice British translation and it is available with the Deuterocanonicals. Not sure if it has imprimatur but the RC Bishops of England and Wales were involved with the translation process.

Also note that there are extant multiple versions of the New American Bible as it has been revised and re-revised and some texts are dramatically different from one version to the next.

NAB here.

NJB here.

Douay-Rheims here.

EWTN has the RSV-CE here (although it’s an odd interface - you think you can only get specific verses. But if you just pick the name of the book from the drop-down, you’ll get the whole thing).

The Christian Community Bible is a new one to me, looks very interesting!

Today’s English Version, now known as “Good News Translation” is on Bible Gateway. (As is the 1899 Douay-Rheims ).
 
That’s most of them.

Revised English Bible is a nice British translation and it is available with the Deuterocanonicals. Not sure if it has imprimatur but the RC Bishops of England and Wales were involved with the translation process.
I agree that the REB is a nice translation. It is a more dynamic translation than the RSV or the NAB but it is probably one of the smoothest flowing translations for general reading. It uses very good English. It does not have an imprimatur, but as an ecumenical translation it was co-sponsored by the UK Catholic Churches as you mentioned. But it was released in 1989 the same year that the NRSV came out and it was over shadowed.
 
Here is the list of Bible versions officially approved by the Catholic Church from EWTN. This list fails to mention the Knox Version which went out of print, but will soon be back in print again. It also fails to include the Christian Community Bible, but I don’t know if that version has been officially approved. The Navarre Bible is a study Bible that uses the RSV-CE translation. The RSV-CE 2nd edition contains some minor changes, and was never officially submitted for approval as a separate version.

**
Bible Versions and Commentaries

Liturgical Use in United States**
There is only one English text currently approved by the Church for use in the United States. This text is the one contained in the Lectionaries approved for Sundays & Feasts and for Weekdays by the USCCB and recognized by the Holy See. These Lectionaries have their American and Roman approval documents in the front. The text is that of the New American Bible with revised Psalms and New Testament (1988, 1991), with some changes mandated by the Holy See where the NAB text used so-called vertical inclusive language (e.g. avoiding male pronouns for God). Since these Lectionaries have been fully promulgated, the permission to use the Jerusalem Bible and the RSV-Catholic at Mass has been withdrawn. [See note on inclusive language]

Devotional Reading
A bewildering array of Catholic Bibles are available for personal use. They all have imprimaturs, but not all avoid the use of inclusive language. That use is indicated in the summary. The order is generally chronological.

**1. Douai-Rheims. **The original Catholic Bible in English, pre-dating the King James Version (1611). It was translated from the Latin Vulgate, the Church’s official Scripture text, by English Catholics in exile on the continent. The NT was completed and published in 1582 when the English College (the seminary for English Catholics) was located at Rheims. The Old Testament was published in 1610 when the College was located at Douai. Bishop Challoner’s 1750 edition, and subsequent revisions by others up to the 20th century, is the most common edition. Retains some archaic English. The 1899 edition is available from TAN Books. The text is widely available on line, including EWTN’s library.

2. Confraternity Edition. Begun in 1936 by the American bishops’ Confraternity for Christian Doctrine as a translation from the Clementine Vulgate. The publication of Pius XII’s encyclical Divino afflante spiritu (1943) caused the translation committee to switch to the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek texts. Not all books were completed by the time of Vatican II (1962-1965). Those that were finished were used in the liturgy in the 1950s and 60s. Published in a dignified American idiom. Though hard to find, this edition of the Scriptures is worth possessing.

3. Revised Standard Version (RSV) - Catholic Edition. Translated for an American audience from the original languages in the 1940s and 1950s by the National Council of the Churches of Christ, and adapted for Catholic use by the Catholic Biblical Association (1966). Considered the best combination of literal (formal equivalence translation) and literary by many orthodox Catholic scholars. Published today by Ignatius Press (Ignatius Bible) and Scepter Press, and available through EWTN’s Religious Catalogue.

**4.1 New American Bible or NAB (1970). **Translated from the original languages by the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine according to the principles of Vatican II for use in the liturgy. It was the basis of the American Lectionary from the 1970s until 2002. A good translation, but it was criticized for its changing of some traditional and familiar expressions, such as “full of grace”.
**
4.2 NAB with Revised New Testament (1986). A restoration of some traditional familiar phraseology. Unfortunately, it also included some mild inclusive language. No longer widely available, owing to the publication of the revised Psalms (see next entry).
**
4.3 NAB with Revised Psalms and Revised New Testament (1991).
It was due to the use of vertical inclusive language (re: God and Christ) and some uses of horizontal inclusive language (re: human beings), that the Holy See rejected this text as the basis of a revised Lectionary for the United States. This is the version of the NAB currently on sale in the United States.

4.4 Modified NAB with Revised Psalms and Revised New Testament (2000-2002). This title is of my own invention. It does not refer to any currently available Bible, but to the NAB with Revised Psalms and Revised NT, as modified by a committee of the Holy See and the Bishops for use in the liturgy. It is the text found in all current Lectionaries in the U.S… The Holy See accepted some use of inclusive language, where the speaker/author intended a mixed audience (e.g. “brothers and sisters”, instead of the older “brethren”), but rejected it in references to God or Christ, and man, where the word has anthropological and theological significance (e.g. Psalm 1:1, with reference to Adam and Christ). Whether a Bible will be made available having these modified NAB texts is not known at this time. Since they do not extend to the entire Bible, it is possible that none will be, as that would require further editing of the underlying NAB text.

continued…
 
**5. Jerusalem Bible (1966). **A translation based on the French edition of the Dominicans of the Ecole Biblique in Jerusalem, who translated it from the original languages. This Bible is the one used by Mother Angelica on the air. The full version has copious footnotes but is hard to find, as it has not been recently republished. A Reader’s Edition, without the full footnoting, is available through EWTN’s Religious Catalogue.

6. New Revised Standard Version - Catholic Edition (1989). An adaptation for Catholic use of the NRSV of the National Council of the Churches of Christ. Although used in the American edition of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, it was rejected for liturgical use by the Holy See owing to inclusive language in some unacceptable places. With this exception, like the predecessor RSV, it is a good formal equivalent translation (i.e. literal, but literary).

7. New Jerusalem Bible (1990). A revision of the Jerusalem Bible directly from the original languages. It contains inclusive language, similar to that rejected in the revised NAB by the Holy See for use in the liturgy, but is considered a very literary text, and comparable in quality to the NRSV in scholarship.

8. Today’s’ English Version - Catholic (1992). This is the Catholic edition of the popular Good News Bible by the American Bible Society. Translated according to the principle of dynamic equivalence for readability. The same principle was used by ICEL to translate the Mass texts. Would be better to call a paraphrase than a translation.

Catholic versus Protestant Bibles
Bible translations developed for Catholic use are complete Bibles. This means that they contain the entire canonical text identified by Pope Damasus and the Synod of Rome (382) and the local Councils of Hippo (393) and Carthage (397), contained in St. Jerome’s Latin Vulgate translation (420), and decreed infallibly by the Ecumenical Council of Trent (1570). This canonical text contains the same 27 NT Testament books which Protestant versions contain, but 46 Old Testament books, instead of 39. These 7 books, and parts of 2 others, are called Deuterocanonical by Catholics (2nd canon) and Apocrypha (false writings) by Protestants, who dropped them at the time of the Reformation. The Deuterocanonical texts are Tobias (Tobit), Judith, Baruch, Ecclesiasticus (Sirach), Wisdom, First and Second Maccabees and parts of Esther and Daniel. Some Protestant Bibles include the “Apocrypha” as pious reading.
 
  1. Francis Aloysius Spencer, The New Testament of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, translated into English from the original Greek by the Very Rev. Francis Aloysius Spencer, O.P.; edited by Charles J. Callan, O.P., and John A. McHugh, O.P. New York: The Macmillan company, 1937. This is one of the first translations of the Greek text done by Roman Catholics. Spencer had published a translation of the four Gospels in 1898, and had completed a translation of the remainder of the New Testament by the time of his death in 1913. The remainder went unpublished until Callan and McHugh revised Spencer’s complete translation for this volume.
  2. Edward P. Arbez, ed., The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, translated from the Latin Vulgate; a revision of the Challoner-Rheims version edited by Catholic scholars under the patronage of the Episcopal committee of the Confraternity of Christian doctrine. Paterson, N.J.: St. Anthony guild press, 1941. Further information.
  3. James A. Kleist and Joseph L. Lilly, The New Testament Rendered from the Original Greek with Explanatory Notes: Part One, The Four Gospels, translated by James A. Kleist, S. J.; Part two, The Acts of the Apostles, Epistles, and Apocalypse translated by Joseph L. Lilly, C. M. Milwaukee: Bruce Publishing Co., 1954. A modern-language translation with introductions and notes, by two Roman Catholic scholars. Based on the Greek text edited by the Jesuit scholar José Bover, in Novi Testamenti Biblia Graeca et Latina (Madrid, 1943).
  4. Ronald A. Knox, The Holy Bible; A Translation from the Latin Vulgate in the Light of the Hebrew and Greek Originals. London: Burns and Oates, 1955. The New Testament appeared in 1944.
  5. Bernardo Hurault, Christian Community Bible: Translated, Presented and Commented for the Christian Communities of the Philippines and the Third World; and for Those Who Seek God. Complete Text Translated from Hebrew and Greek. Pastoral Edition. Quezon City, Philippines: Claretian Publications, 1988. Further Information.
bible-researcher.com/versbib10.html

The New Testament [Hardcover]
Nicholas King (Translator)
amazon.com/New-Testament-Nicholas-King/dp/1844173240

The Old Testament Volume 3 - The Wisdom Literature
by Nicholas King

The Old Testament Volume 1: The Pentateuch
by Nicholas King

eden.co.uk/en/nicholas-king
theway.org.uk/comersus/store/comersus_listCategoriesAndProducts.asp?idCategory=52
cbagb.org.uk/pdfs/145_SBJan2011.book%20reviews.pdf

cbagb.org.uk/cba/112-interview-with-fr-nick-king-sj-about-his-old-testament-translation-project
 
I really like the GNB. I like to keep a more literal translation around as well but for easy reading this is the way to go IMO. Plus it’s church approved.

The version I have has lot of nice extras in it as well.
 
I don’t know the links, but here are the translations that I know of:
Douay-Rheims
New American Bible
Revised Standard Version (CE/2CE)
New Revised Standard Version CE
Jerusalem Bible
New Jerusalem Bible
Christian Community Bible
Good News Bible
Confraternity (NT only)
Knox (NT only)
yes this would be a correct listing of approved translations. There are a few non approved translations one should be aware and one is by Ron Conte. He has no approval on such. Also don’t forget the Latin Vulgate (Clementine and Nova Vulgata), there is a few imposter Vulgates out there as well that aren’t approved by the church
 
What I find sad is that no one has published an approved english translation of the Nova Vulgata, and it has been in place since 1979/1986.

25 years later and one of the most spoken languages on the face of the earth has no translation of the official bible of the Catholic Church 😦

P.S. - I don’t know if anyone noticed, but JPII quoted from the RSV and NRSV when he referred to scripture in publishing the CCC, and Benedict XVI referred to the RSV in his “Jesus of Nazareth” biography(ies).
 
What I find sad is that no one has published an approved english translation of the Nova Vulgata, and it has been in place since 1979/1986.

25 years later and one of the most spoken languages on the face of the earth has no translation of the official bible of the Catholic Church 😦
Actually English is third behind Mandarin and Spanish, but perhaps the Nova Vulgata was meant to encourage more study of Latin?
… Benedict XVI referred to the RSV in his “Jesus of Nazareth” biography(ies).
This is not a knock against him but a lot of English is getting more and more tilted towards Panglish these days.

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-546469/How-English-know-disappearing—replaced-Panglish.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top