You are very close. But we can even get closer to the problem. Lets assume that God’s mental contents are X and Y, X being absence of creation and Y is presence of creation. God is however in state of timeless meaning that he cannot give an order to his thought, X comes before Y, since that requires time. Hence the very act of creation is impossible for timeless God.
You are adding nothing Bahman. The first proposition does not exclude any change.
Well, I do think that consciousness is primary hence it cannot be created, hence the very act of creation is equal to a command of consciousness/persona to subconsciousness, the command is then executed by subconsciousness and the act of creation is then performed with unconsciousness.
You were talking about a timeless God, Bahman. What is the relation between the timeless God and this stuff that you are talking now.
You asked for the act of creation. I think we agreed that timeless God is nonsense.
Actually, I was asking you to define “creation” in an acceptable way in order to see if your argument concludes or not. But instead of it you took to opportunity to introduce your doctrines about conscience. And now you would like to conclude that the timeless God that you conceived before is nonsense!
To create in my dictionary is equal to producing illusion out of nothing.
Timeless can exist. What do you mean with something?
Timeless just have potential to do one thing.
Time is cognitive.
We don’t measure time with the speed of light.
That is how our physical world works.
How does it work north of north what resides there?
I don’t understand.
As far as I see everyone uses the General Theory of Relativity which relates back to E=MC2, the latter models admit they have to re-calculate to deviate the further concept of Quantum Gravity which further admits on-going energy-matter. They avoided any reference point and started a new north, north of north. Which avoids any question of existence.
Yes timeless can exist. What can it do when the entire concept is to measure something doing something?
So how is cognitive used, with and without activity, which is predicated on a timeless paradigm or one with time. You can’t have activity and not have activity together. You can’t have potential inactive and active at the same time.
The very act of existence is equal to performing the only one act.
It can do only one act and one experience.
So your arguing for activity on an eternal time line? So something existed eternally with the ability to act or not?