Dinosaurs and the Flood

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanielJosephBoucher
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I vaguely remember a bio professor mentioning that it’s like fish…singular or plural! 🤣
 
buffalo said:
Here is a list if ID peer reviewed papers. https://www.discovery.org/m/2018/12/ID-Peer-Review-July-2017.pdf
Click to expand...
Fact checked this website

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE​

Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See
 
To be fair I believe that site also called some pretty good websites unreliable or pseudojournalism.
 
buffalo said:
What about the professionals who are finding it no longer tenable?
Click to expand...
What exactly is your scientific training?

I ask because it seems like you’re just taking random stuff from a fundamentalist website. Your evidence is randomly scattered all over creation (pun!). First there’s dinosaurs on the Arc, then Moses writing Genesis on clay tablets he got from Noah, then a poorly focused attack on evolutionary theory in which you provide no sources, then . . . I’m not sure what comes next, but something surely will.

So, what exactly, are you an expert on?
 
nicholasG said:
Fact checked this website
Click to expand...
Ah ha - I knew this would be the play. You cannot discuss the actual papers or evidence so resort to rule #1. (attack the credibility) I expect the names list will get the same treatment. The tactic does nothing to deal with the findings and their veracity.

It is simply amazing how many people will give credibility to anything Darwin.
 
I know. I watch CNN and they had questions on their sources as well. I checked and the fact check website was correct much to my surprise. But CNN was aware and fixed the issue.
 
buffalo said:
Let’s continue to talk biology. What is you explanation for cell complexity?
Click to expand...
I’m not a biologist. I have no training and cannot discuss it meaningfully.

What is your training, education, and level of expertise in biology?
 
buffalo said:
We will only discuss the actual issues and findings of modern science. If you cannot, then just lurk.
Click to expand...
If you want a specific conversation with specifically qualified people you can go to a PM exchange. You have no right to tell someone to lurk.
 
What is your training, education, and level of expertise in biology?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top