M
meltzerboy2
Guest
Sounds like Noah’s wife.
Last edited:
- Status
B
Buzzard3
Guest
You bet. And remember how she hated unicorns too? Noah told me she got bucked off one when she was a little girl and developed a phoba for them. Hence, she insisted on no unicorns in the ark. Pretty sad, really.
M
meltzerboy2
Guest
It’s so nice to reminisce with you about this.
R
Rau
Guest
What then do you understand to be the nature of the Australian aborigines who are said to have inhabited Australia for 40,000+ years? Do you hold that they arrived in Australia far less than for 40,000 years ago or some other explanation?
Last edited:
B
buffalo
Guest
Baby dino’s in stasis would not be a problem.
D
davidharper
Guest
Are you actually serious with your posts? Or are you just trolling the more intelligent people?
B
Buzzard3
Guest
Those were the days … Oh, to be young again …
M
meltzerboy2
Guest
We less intelligent ones must make do with what we have.
R
Rau
Guest
I believe it’s connected with dating various kinds of artifact discovery, rather than “assumptions”. But in any case if I understand you, you’re saying the date estimates are simply very wrong because the right answer cannot exceed 5-10,000 years - is that right?
Last edited:
B
Buzzard3
Guest
I guess I could extend my range a little more, but 40, 000 years is pushing it. Which infallible technique did scientists use to arrive at the “40, 000 years” figure?
You realize of course that before they even get started, these scientists assume that humans evolved from a hominid and have therefore existed for hundreds of thousands of years, at the very least.
It’s interesting that Orthodox Jews calculate the creation of Adam as 5870 years ago.
B
Buzzard3
Guest
I liked Noah a lot, but he buggered off in the flood without paying me that all that work I did on his ark (the roof, mainly). I guess he’ll pay me later …
Last edited:
R
Rau
Guest
No idea, but they’ve been doing this for quite some time. I’m not aware of a raging battle in the literature suggesting all these estimates are grossly wrong.
B
Buzzard3
Guest
Why would they? 40,000 years sounds acceptably long enough for the Darwinists cult that dominates the scientific community. I live in Australia and the figure 60,000 years is becoming popular.
A Biblical perspective of 10,000 years or less wouldn’t be acceptable because that doesn’t fit Darwinist folklore.
If humans have been around for 40,000 years or more, how come Europeans discovered the Americas only 500 years ago? It must have taken them 40,000 years to learn how to build a boat!
C
CaptainPrudeman
Guest
Took them a long time to need a way to get around the Ottoman Turks. People don’t explore for fun. They explore for a certain goal. There was no reason to go that far west until the late 1400’s.
P
PickyPicky
Guest
Perhaps discovering America was not their greatest ambition.
K
Kaninchen
Guest
Building a boat big enough to take a crew and its provisions West to anywhere important (China, India, Japan) had certainly been a long term logistical problem - a lot of longitude involved. Had Columbus not bumped into the Americas at roughly the point he’d expected Asia, his crews would have perished from thirst/starvation.
F
Freddy
Guest
What on earth does that mean? 10k years isn’t acceptable because it doesn’t tie in with the evidence. Archaelologic evidence. There is no ‘Darwinist folklore’. Do you think that archaeologists adjust their figures to tie in with other branches of science? What nonsense.Rau:
Why would they? 40,000 years sounds acceptably long enough for the Darwinists cult that dominates the scientific community. I live in Australia and the figure 60,000 years is becoming popular.
A Biblical perspective of 10,000 years or less wouldn’t be acceptable because that doesn’t fit Darwinist folklore.
Dates of up to 80,000 years have been proposed using carbon dating and optically stimulated luminescence and have been confirmed by separate tests in Waikato Uni and Adelaide Uni. Australian dig finds evidence of Aboriginal habitation up to 80,000 years ago | Indigenous Australians | The Guardian.
R
Rau
Guest
Quite right Fred. Can you imagine the fame that would accrue to the team of scientists who demonstrated that long established scientific processes for dating time points at 40,000+ years ago are in fact in error by a factor of perhaps 4-10 times! What a breakthrough that would be!
P
PickyPicky
Guest
I thought the theory was that Leif Erickson discovered America but was wise enough to keep quiet about it.
Last edited:
- Status